高压氧疗法对狗被蛇咬伤相关伤口的影响。

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Shelly Olin DVM, DACVIM, Julie Schildt DVM, DACVECC, Michael Lane DVM, DACVIM, Adesola Odunayo DVM, MS, DACVECC, Cary Springer MS, Dana Call RVT, VTS (ECC), CHT-V, Selene Jones DACVD, DVM, Dennis Geiser DVM, CHT-V, DABVP, Daryl Millis DVM, DACVS, CCRP, Marti Drum DVM, PhD, CCRP, CERP
{"title":"高压氧疗法对狗被蛇咬伤相关伤口的影响。","authors":"Shelly Olin DVM, DACVIM,&nbsp;Julie Schildt DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Michael Lane DVM, DACVIM,&nbsp;Adesola Odunayo DVM, MS, DACVECC,&nbsp;Cary Springer MS,&nbsp;Dana Call RVT, VTS (ECC), CHT-V,&nbsp;Selene Jones DACVD, DVM,&nbsp;Dennis Geiser DVM, CHT-V, DABVP,&nbsp;Daryl Millis DVM, DACVS, CCRP,&nbsp;Marti Drum DVM, PhD, CCRP, CERP","doi":"10.1111/vec.13383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on <i>Crotalinae</i> envenomation-induced wound swelling and severity and pain in dogs, and to describe the safety and complications of HBOT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded study (2017–2021).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University teaching hospital, private veterinary practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-six client-owned dogs presenting within 24 hours of a confirmed or suspected naturally occurring <i>Crotalinae</i> snake bite injury were enrolled between 2017 and 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>In addition to the standard of care treatment, dogs received 2 interventions with either HBOT (<i>n</i> = 19) or control (<i>n</i> = 16) within 24 hours of hospital admission. Dogs receiving HBOT were pressurized over 15 minutes (1 psi/min), maintained at a target pressure of 2 atmosphere absolute (ATA) for 30 minutes, and decompressed over 15 minutes. Control dogs received 1 ATA for 1 hour. Local wound swelling, wound severity score, and pain score were assessed at admission, before and after each intervention, and at hospital discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was no significant difference in wound swelling (<i>P </i>= 0.414), severity score (<i>P </i>= 1.000), or pain score (<i>P </i>= 0.689) between HBOT and control groups. Pain decreased significantly over time regardless of the study intervention (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.001). There were no major adverse effects associated with either study intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>HBOT did not significantly alter the short-term recovery from <i>Crotalinae</i> envenomation in this study population. However, the study might be underpowered to detect a significant treatment effect.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"34 3","pages":"211-221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.13383","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on snake-bite-associated wounds in dogs\",\"authors\":\"Shelly Olin DVM, DACVIM,&nbsp;Julie Schildt DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Michael Lane DVM, DACVIM,&nbsp;Adesola Odunayo DVM, MS, DACVECC,&nbsp;Cary Springer MS,&nbsp;Dana Call RVT, VTS (ECC), CHT-V,&nbsp;Selene Jones DACVD, DVM,&nbsp;Dennis Geiser DVM, CHT-V, DABVP,&nbsp;Daryl Millis DVM, DACVS, CCRP,&nbsp;Marti Drum DVM, PhD, CCRP, CERP\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vec.13383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on <i>Crotalinae</i> envenomation-induced wound swelling and severity and pain in dogs, and to describe the safety and complications of HBOT.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded study (2017–2021).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>University teaching hospital, private veterinary practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Animals</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-six client-owned dogs presenting within 24 hours of a confirmed or suspected naturally occurring <i>Crotalinae</i> snake bite injury were enrolled between 2017 and 2021.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interventions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In addition to the standard of care treatment, dogs received 2 interventions with either HBOT (<i>n</i> = 19) or control (<i>n</i> = 16) within 24 hours of hospital admission. Dogs receiving HBOT were pressurized over 15 minutes (1 psi/min), maintained at a target pressure of 2 atmosphere absolute (ATA) for 30 minutes, and decompressed over 15 minutes. Control dogs received 1 ATA for 1 hour. Local wound swelling, wound severity score, and pain score were assessed at admission, before and after each intervention, and at hospital discharge.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was no significant difference in wound swelling (<i>P </i>= 0.414), severity score (<i>P </i>= 1.000), or pain score (<i>P </i>= 0.689) between HBOT and control groups. Pain decreased significantly over time regardless of the study intervention (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.001). There were no major adverse effects associated with either study intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>HBOT did not significantly alter the short-term recovery from <i>Crotalinae</i> envenomation in this study population. However, the study might be underpowered to detect a significant treatment effect.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"211-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.13383\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13383\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估高压氧疗法(HBOT)对犬螫伤引起的伤口肿胀、严重程度和疼痛的影响,并描述高压氧疗法的安全性和并发症:前瞻性、随机对照、盲法研究(2017-2021年):大学教学医院、私人兽医诊所:在2017年至2021年期间,36只客户饲养的狗在24小时内出现确诊或疑似自然发生的克罗塔林科蛇咬伤.干预措施:除标准护理治疗外,犬只还在入院后 24 小时内接受了 HBOT(n = 19)或对照组(n = 16)的 2 次干预。接受 HBOT 治疗的狗在 15 分钟内加压(1 psi/min),在 2 个绝对大气压 (ATA) 的目标压力下维持 30 分钟,然后在 15 分钟内减压。对照组狗接受 1 ATA 加压 1 小时。在入院时、每次干预前后和出院时对局部伤口肿胀、伤口严重程度评分和疼痛评分进行评估:HBOT 组和对照组在伤口肿胀(P = 0.414)、伤口严重程度评分(P = 1.000)或疼痛评分(P = 0.689)方面无明显差异。随着时间的推移,疼痛明显减轻,而与研究干预无关(P 结论:HBOT 并未明显改变伤口的短期疗效:在这项研究的人群中,HBOT 并未明显改变 Crotalinae 中毒后的短期恢复情况。不过,这项研究的力量可能不足以检测出明显的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on snake-bite-associated wounds in dogs

The effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on snake-bite-associated wounds in dogs

Objective

To assess the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on Crotalinae envenomation-induced wound swelling and severity and pain in dogs, and to describe the safety and complications of HBOT.

Design

Prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded study (2017–2021).

Setting

University teaching hospital, private veterinary practice.

Animals

Thirty-six client-owned dogs presenting within 24 hours of a confirmed or suspected naturally occurring Crotalinae snake bite injury were enrolled between 2017 and 2021.

Interventions

In addition to the standard of care treatment, dogs received 2 interventions with either HBOT (n = 19) or control (n = 16) within 24 hours of hospital admission. Dogs receiving HBOT were pressurized over 15 minutes (1 psi/min), maintained at a target pressure of 2 atmosphere absolute (ATA) for 30 minutes, and decompressed over 15 minutes. Control dogs received 1 ATA for 1 hour. Local wound swelling, wound severity score, and pain score were assessed at admission, before and after each intervention, and at hospital discharge.

Measurements and Main Results

There was no significant difference in wound swelling (= 0.414), severity score (= 1.000), or pain score (= 0.689) between HBOT and control groups. Pain decreased significantly over time regardless of the study intervention (< 0.001). There were no major adverse effects associated with either study intervention.

Conclusions

HBOT did not significantly alter the short-term recovery from Crotalinae envenomation in this study population. However, the study might be underpowered to detect a significant treatment effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信