食物舌下免疫疗法:真实食物更新方案的安全性和简易性

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
{"title":"食物舌下免疫疗法:真实食物更新方案的安全性和简易性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sublingual immunotherapy<span> (SLIT) using food extracts<span> is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Patients with food allergy<span> aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 </span></span>dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions<span><span> beyond itchy mouth<span>. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise </span></span>challenge test results in 12 patients were negative.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sublingual immunotherapy<span> (SLIT) using food extracts<span> is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Patients with food allergy<span> aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 </span></span>dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions<span><span> beyond itchy mouth<span>. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise </span></span>challenge test results in 12 patients were negative.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219824005191\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219824005191","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用食物提取物的舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)对食物过敏患者脱敏安全有效,但在临床实践中并不常用:我们提出了一种使用真实食物的经济高效、快速的舌下免疫疗法方案:方法:食物过敏患者年龄在 5-50 岁之间,中位数为 11 岁,在一家诊所开始使用食物 SLIT。根据食物的不同,每日维持剂量为 4-11 毫克蛋白质,体积为 0.1-0.5 毫升。一些食物在当地杂货店有售(牛奶、蛋白液和腰果/核桃/葵花/榛子奶),而其他食物则在诊所用面粉和 50%甘油盐水配制(花生/芝麻/小麦)。第一批 20 名患者以 1:1,000 的稀释比例开始配药,随后的 30 名患者以 1:100 的稀释比例开始配药。对一部分服用维持剂量的患者进行了运动挑战,以评估是否需要在服药前或服药后休息一段时间:结果:1:1,000 和 1:100 两组患者在完成第一天用药后,除口腔瘙痒外均未出现其他不良反应。在整个研究期间,没有出现需要使用肾上腺素的全身反应,88%的人达到了维持剂量。对 6 个月的花生粉溶液进行的皮肤测试结果与新鲜溶液相比没有降低,与食物提取物相似。12名患者的运动挑战测试结果均为阴性:结论:已发表的试验中使用的过敏原提取物食品 SLIT 有成本和多次就诊的局限性。价格低廉的真实食物,蛋白质剂量相同或稍高,患者在至少间隔一周的时间内分 4 次服用,耐受性良好。与食物口服免疫疗法不同,服用前或服用后可能无需休息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol

Background

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice.

Objectives

To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food.

Methods

Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period.

Results

The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative.

Conclusions

Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信