工作记忆训练能改善情绪调节并减少内化症状吗?一对三级荟萃分析。

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Xiaobing Cui , Siyuan Zhang , Shuting Yu , Qingwen Ding , Xuebing Li
{"title":"工作记忆训练能改善情绪调节并减少内化症状吗?一对三级荟萃分析。","authors":"Xiaobing Cui ,&nbsp;Siyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuting Yu ,&nbsp;Qingwen Ding ,&nbsp;Xuebing Li","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emotional dysfunction is a core feature of many mental disorders. Working memory training (WM-T) is promising to improve emotion regulation and reduce internalizing symptoms (anxiety and depressive symptoms), but the results are mixed. Therefore, we conducted meta-analyses to clarify these mixed results.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO to identify relevant studies and screened the references. The effect size was calculated using Hedges’ <em>g</em>. Three-level, random-effects models were run using metafor in R.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The current study included 44 articles, of which 29 were involved with emotion regulation, and 30 were involved with internalizing symptoms. The results showed that WM-T could yield emotional benefits, but the benefits were confined to enhancing explicit emotional regulation capacity and reducing anxiety symptoms. For the meta-analysis regarding the effect of WM-T on emotion regulation, there was no significant moderator. For the meta-analysis regarding the effect of WM-T on internalizing symptoms, the emotional valence of the material and control group were statistically significant moderators.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>WM-T could yield certain emotional effects, but only to improve explicit emotion regulation capacity and reduce anxiety symptoms. In addition, some measures could enhance the effect, such as targeting specific populations, increasing the number of training sessions (≥15) or duration (&gt;450 minutes), using negative material, and using n-back training tasks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 104549"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does working memory training improve emotion regulation and reduce internalizing symptoms? A pair of three-level meta-analyses\",\"authors\":\"Xiaobing Cui ,&nbsp;Siyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuting Yu ,&nbsp;Qingwen Ding ,&nbsp;Xuebing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emotional dysfunction is a core feature of many mental disorders. Working memory training (WM-T) is promising to improve emotion regulation and reduce internalizing symptoms (anxiety and depressive symptoms), but the results are mixed. Therefore, we conducted meta-analyses to clarify these mixed results.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO to identify relevant studies and screened the references. The effect size was calculated using Hedges’ <em>g</em>. Three-level, random-effects models were run using metafor in R.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The current study included 44 articles, of which 29 were involved with emotion regulation, and 30 were involved with internalizing symptoms. The results showed that WM-T could yield emotional benefits, but the benefits were confined to enhancing explicit emotional regulation capacity and reducing anxiety symptoms. For the meta-analysis regarding the effect of WM-T on emotion regulation, there was no significant moderator. For the meta-analysis regarding the effect of WM-T on internalizing symptoms, the emotional valence of the material and control group were statistically significant moderators.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>WM-T could yield certain emotional effects, but only to improve explicit emotion regulation capacity and reduce anxiety symptoms. In addition, some measures could enhance the effect, such as targeting specific populations, increasing the number of training sessions (≥15) or duration (&gt;450 minutes), using negative material, and using n-back training tasks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000767\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000767","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:情绪功能障碍是许多精神障碍的核心特征。工作记忆训练(WM-T)有望改善情绪调节并减轻内化症状(焦虑和抑郁症状),但研究结果不一。因此,我们进行了荟萃分析,以澄清这些混杂的结果:我们检索了 Web of Science、PubMed、ScienceDirect 和 EBSCO,以确定相关研究并筛选参考文献。使用 Hedges'g 计算效应大小,并使用 R 中的 metafor 运行三水平随机效应模型:本研究共纳入 44 篇文章,其中 29 篇涉及情绪调节,30 篇涉及内化症状。结果表明,WM-T 可以产生情绪方面的益处,但这种益处仅限于提高明确的情绪调节能力和减少焦虑症状。关于 WM-T 对情绪调节作用的荟萃分析,没有发现显著的调节因素。在有关 WM-T 对内化症状影响的荟萃分析中,材料和对照组的情绪价值在统计学上具有显著的调节作用:结论:WM-T 可以产生一定的情绪效应,但仅限于提高明确的情绪调节能力和减少焦虑症状。此外,一些措施可以增强效果,如针对特定人群、增加训练次数(≥15次)或持续时间(>450分钟)、使用负面材料和使用N-back训练任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does working memory training improve emotion regulation and reduce internalizing symptoms? A pair of three-level meta-analyses

Background

Emotional dysfunction is a core feature of many mental disorders. Working memory training (WM-T) is promising to improve emotion regulation and reduce internalizing symptoms (anxiety and depressive symptoms), but the results are mixed. Therefore, we conducted meta-analyses to clarify these mixed results.

Methods

We searched Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO to identify relevant studies and screened the references. The effect size was calculated using Hedges’ g. Three-level, random-effects models were run using metafor in R.

Results

The current study included 44 articles, of which 29 were involved with emotion regulation, and 30 were involved with internalizing symptoms. The results showed that WM-T could yield emotional benefits, but the benefits were confined to enhancing explicit emotional regulation capacity and reducing anxiety symptoms. For the meta-analysis regarding the effect of WM-T on emotion regulation, there was no significant moderator. For the meta-analysis regarding the effect of WM-T on internalizing symptoms, the emotional valence of the material and control group were statistically significant moderators.

Conclusion

WM-T could yield certain emotional effects, but only to improve explicit emotion regulation capacity and reduce anxiety symptoms. In addition, some measures could enhance the effect, such as targeting specific populations, increasing the number of training sessions (≥15) or duration (>450 minutes), using negative material, and using n-back training tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信