{"title":"无症状短宫颈与濒临早产:围产期结果比较研究","authors":"Clémentine Amalric , Yoann Athiel , Jacques Lepercq , Aude Girault","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the rate of delivery within 15 days of admission among patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (ASC) compared to those admitted for threatened preterm labor (TPL).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study conducted in a tertiary maternity hospital, included patients with a singleton pregnancy admitted with a cervical length of less than 25 mm between 24 and 34 weeks. The population was divided into two groups, patients with ASC (i.e., with no contractions at admission) and patients with TPL. The primary outcome was the delivery rate within 15 days of admission. Secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, preterm delivery rate before 37°<sup>/7</sup> weeks and before 34°<sup>/7</sup> weeks, admission to delivery interval, 5 min Apgar score and transfer to neonatal intensive care unit rate. The characteristics of the two groups and the primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the two groups using univariate analysis. Two subgroup analysis were performed, one restricted to patients with a mildly modified CL (15 ≤ CL < 25 mm), and one excluding patients at high risk of preterm birth.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 247 included patients, 136 (55.1 %) had TPL, and 111 (44.9 %) ASC. There were no significant differences in the rate of patient who delivered within 15 days of admission between the groups, 13.2 % in the TPL group vs 8.0 % in the ASC group (<em>p</em> = 0.22). Patients in the TPL group had a significantly higher frequency of delivery before 34 weeks compared to those in the ASC group (19.9 % versus 9.0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.02 This finding persisted in the subgroup analysis excluding patients at high risk of preterm birth (16.5 % in the TPL subgroup vs. 6.9 % in the ASC subgroup, <em>p</em> = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the rates of preterm delivery before 37 weeks, the admission-to-delivery interval, or neonatal outcomes between the two groups or within the subgroup analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The frequency of delivery within 15 days of admission was not statistically different between patients with an asymptomatic short cervix and those with TPL. Nevertheless, these asymptomatic patients delivered significantly later and less frequently before 34 weeks, with only one in ten requiring corticosteroids.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 7","pages":"Article 102798"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246878472400076X/pdfft?md5=726c9ec70d1353b151754e3514f73aa1&pid=1-s2.0-S246878472400076X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymptomatic short cervix and threatened preterm labor: A comparative study on perinatal outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Clémentine Amalric , Yoann Athiel , Jacques Lepercq , Aude Girault\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the rate of delivery within 15 days of admission among patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (ASC) compared to those admitted for threatened preterm labor (TPL).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study conducted in a tertiary maternity hospital, included patients with a singleton pregnancy admitted with a cervical length of less than 25 mm between 24 and 34 weeks. The population was divided into two groups, patients with ASC (i.e., with no contractions at admission) and patients with TPL. The primary outcome was the delivery rate within 15 days of admission. Secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, preterm delivery rate before 37°<sup>/7</sup> weeks and before 34°<sup>/7</sup> weeks, admission to delivery interval, 5 min Apgar score and transfer to neonatal intensive care unit rate. The characteristics of the two groups and the primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the two groups using univariate analysis. Two subgroup analysis were performed, one restricted to patients with a mildly modified CL (15 ≤ CL < 25 mm), and one excluding patients at high risk of preterm birth.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 247 included patients, 136 (55.1 %) had TPL, and 111 (44.9 %) ASC. There were no significant differences in the rate of patient who delivered within 15 days of admission between the groups, 13.2 % in the TPL group vs 8.0 % in the ASC group (<em>p</em> = 0.22). Patients in the TPL group had a significantly higher frequency of delivery before 34 weeks compared to those in the ASC group (19.9 % versus 9.0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.02 This finding persisted in the subgroup analysis excluding patients at high risk of preterm birth (16.5 % in the TPL subgroup vs. 6.9 % in the ASC subgroup, <em>p</em> = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the rates of preterm delivery before 37 weeks, the admission-to-delivery interval, or neonatal outcomes between the two groups or within the subgroup analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The frequency of delivery within 15 days of admission was not statistically different between patients with an asymptomatic short cervix and those with TPL. Nevertheless, these asymptomatic patients delivered significantly later and less frequently before 34 weeks, with only one in ten requiring corticosteroids.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"53 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 102798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246878472400076X/pdfft?md5=726c9ec70d1353b151754e3514f73aa1&pid=1-s2.0-S246878472400076X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246878472400076X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246878472400076X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Asymptomatic short cervix and threatened preterm labor: A comparative study on perinatal outcomes
Objective
To determine the rate of delivery within 15 days of admission among patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (ASC) compared to those admitted for threatened preterm labor (TPL).
Material and methods
This retrospective study conducted in a tertiary maternity hospital, included patients with a singleton pregnancy admitted with a cervical length of less than 25 mm between 24 and 34 weeks. The population was divided into two groups, patients with ASC (i.e., with no contractions at admission) and patients with TPL. The primary outcome was the delivery rate within 15 days of admission. Secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, preterm delivery rate before 37°/7 weeks and before 34°/7 weeks, admission to delivery interval, 5 min Apgar score and transfer to neonatal intensive care unit rate. The characteristics of the two groups and the primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the two groups using univariate analysis. Two subgroup analysis were performed, one restricted to patients with a mildly modified CL (15 ≤ CL < 25 mm), and one excluding patients at high risk of preterm birth.
Results
Among the 247 included patients, 136 (55.1 %) had TPL, and 111 (44.9 %) ASC. There were no significant differences in the rate of patient who delivered within 15 days of admission between the groups, 13.2 % in the TPL group vs 8.0 % in the ASC group (p = 0.22). Patients in the TPL group had a significantly higher frequency of delivery before 34 weeks compared to those in the ASC group (19.9 % versus 9.0 %, p = 0.02 This finding persisted in the subgroup analysis excluding patients at high risk of preterm birth (16.5 % in the TPL subgroup vs. 6.9 % in the ASC subgroup, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the rates of preterm delivery before 37 weeks, the admission-to-delivery interval, or neonatal outcomes between the two groups or within the subgroup analyses.
Conclusion
The frequency of delivery within 15 days of admission was not statistically different between patients with an asymptomatic short cervix and those with TPL. Nevertheless, these asymptomatic patients delivered significantly later and less frequently before 34 weeks, with only one in ten requiring corticosteroids.
期刊介绍:
Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF).
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines.
Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.