Katherine L. Luo MD, PhD, Laura Santos MD, Rumana Tokaria MBBS, Sachin Jambawalikar PhD, Phuong T. Duong MD, José G. Raya PhD, Sogol Mostoufi-Moab MD, MSCE, Diego Jaramillo MD, MPH
{"title":"骨与骺端的扩散张量成像通用化。","authors":"Katherine L. Luo MD, PhD, Laura Santos MD, Rumana Tokaria MBBS, Sachin Jambawalikar PhD, Phuong T. Duong MD, José G. Raya PhD, Sogol Mostoufi-Moab MD, MSCE, Diego Jaramillo MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Current methods to predict height potential are inaccurate. Predicting height by using MRI of the physeal cartilage has shown promise but the applicability of this technique in different imaging setups has not been well-evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To assess variability in diffusion tensor imaging of the physis and metaphysis (DTI-P/M) of the distal femur between different scanners, imaging parameters, tractography software, and resolution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Type</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population/Subjects</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven healthy subjects (five males and six females ages 10–16.94).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Field Strength/Sequence</h3>\n \n <p>3 T; DTI single shot echo planar sequences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Assessment</h3>\n \n <p>Physeal DTI tract measurements of the distal femur were compared between different scanners, imaging parameters, tractography settings, interpolation correction, and tractography software.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Statistical Tests</h3>\n \n <p>Bland–Altman, Spearman correlation, linear regression, and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Threshold for statistical significance was set at <i>P</i> = 0.05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>DTI tract values consistently showed low variability with different imaging and analysis settings. Vendor to vendor comparison exhibited strong correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.93) and small but significant bias (bias −5.76, limits of agreement [LOA] −24.31 to 12.78). Strong correlation and no significant difference were seen between technical replicates of the General Electric MRI scanner (<i>ρ</i> = 1, bias 0.17 [LOA −1.5 to 1.2], <i>P</i> = 0.42) and the Siemens MRI scanner (<i>ρ</i> = 0.89, bias = 0.56, <i>P</i> = 0.71). Different voxel sizes (1 × 1 × 2 mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 2 × 2 × 3 mm<sup>3</sup>) did not significantly affect DTI values (bias = 1.4 [LOA −5.7 to 8.4], <i>P</i> = 0.35) but maintained a strong correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.82). Gap size (0 mm vs. 0.6 mm) significantly affects tract volume (bias = 1.8 [LOA −5.4 to 1.8]) but maintains a strong correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.93). Comparison of tractography algorithms generated significant differences in tract number, length, and volume while maintaining correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.86, 0.99, 0.93, respectively). Comparison of interobserver variability between different tractography software also revealed significant differences while maintaining high correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.85–0.98).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>DTI of the pediatric physis cartilage shows high reproducibility between different imaging and analytic parameters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evidence Level</h3>\n \n <p>2</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Technical Efficacy</h3>\n \n <p>Stage 1</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":"61 2","pages":"798-804"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalizing Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Physis and Metaphysis\",\"authors\":\"Katherine L. Luo MD, PhD, Laura Santos MD, Rumana Tokaria MBBS, Sachin Jambawalikar PhD, Phuong T. Duong MD, José G. Raya PhD, Sogol Mostoufi-Moab MD, MSCE, Diego Jaramillo MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmri.29455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Current methods to predict height potential are inaccurate. Predicting height by using MRI of the physeal cartilage has shown promise but the applicability of this technique in different imaging setups has not been well-evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess variability in diffusion tensor imaging of the physis and metaphysis (DTI-P/M) of the distal femur between different scanners, imaging parameters, tractography software, and resolution.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Type</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prospective.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population/Subjects</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eleven healthy subjects (five males and six females ages 10–16.94).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Field Strength/Sequence</h3>\\n \\n <p>3 T; DTI single shot echo planar sequences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Assessment</h3>\\n \\n <p>Physeal DTI tract measurements of the distal femur were compared between different scanners, imaging parameters, tractography settings, interpolation correction, and tractography software.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Statistical Tests</h3>\\n \\n <p>Bland–Altman, Spearman correlation, linear regression, and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Threshold for statistical significance was set at <i>P</i> = 0.05.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>DTI tract values consistently showed low variability with different imaging and analysis settings. Vendor to vendor comparison exhibited strong correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.93) and small but significant bias (bias −5.76, limits of agreement [LOA] −24.31 to 12.78). Strong correlation and no significant difference were seen between technical replicates of the General Electric MRI scanner (<i>ρ</i> = 1, bias 0.17 [LOA −1.5 to 1.2], <i>P</i> = 0.42) and the Siemens MRI scanner (<i>ρ</i> = 0.89, bias = 0.56, <i>P</i> = 0.71). Different voxel sizes (1 × 1 × 2 mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 2 × 2 × 3 mm<sup>3</sup>) did not significantly affect DTI values (bias = 1.4 [LOA −5.7 to 8.4], <i>P</i> = 0.35) but maintained a strong correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.82). Gap size (0 mm vs. 0.6 mm) significantly affects tract volume (bias = 1.8 [LOA −5.4 to 1.8]) but maintains a strong correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.93). Comparison of tractography algorithms generated significant differences in tract number, length, and volume while maintaining correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.86, 0.99, 0.93, respectively). Comparison of interobserver variability between different tractography software also revealed significant differences while maintaining high correlation (<i>ρ</i> = 0.85–0.98).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>DTI of the pediatric physis cartilage shows high reproducibility between different imaging and analytic parameters.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Evidence Level</h3>\\n \\n <p>2</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Technical Efficacy</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stage 1</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"volume\":\"61 2\",\"pages\":\"798-804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706308/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.29455\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.29455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Generalizing Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Physis and Metaphysis
Background
Current methods to predict height potential are inaccurate. Predicting height by using MRI of the physeal cartilage has shown promise but the applicability of this technique in different imaging setups has not been well-evaluated.
Purpose
To assess variability in diffusion tensor imaging of the physis and metaphysis (DTI-P/M) of the distal femur between different scanners, imaging parameters, tractography software, and resolution.
Study Type
Prospective.
Population/Subjects
Eleven healthy subjects (five males and six females ages 10–16.94).
Field Strength/Sequence
3 T; DTI single shot echo planar sequences.
Assessment
Physeal DTI tract measurements of the distal femur were compared between different scanners, imaging parameters, tractography settings, interpolation correction, and tractography software.
Statistical Tests
Bland–Altman, Spearman correlation, linear regression, and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Threshold for statistical significance was set at P = 0.05.
Results
DTI tract values consistently showed low variability with different imaging and analysis settings. Vendor to vendor comparison exhibited strong correlation (ρ = 0.93) and small but significant bias (bias −5.76, limits of agreement [LOA] −24.31 to 12.78). Strong correlation and no significant difference were seen between technical replicates of the General Electric MRI scanner (ρ = 1, bias 0.17 [LOA −1.5 to 1.2], P = 0.42) and the Siemens MRI scanner (ρ = 0.89, bias = 0.56, P = 0.71). Different voxel sizes (1 × 1 × 2 mm3 vs. 2 × 2 × 3 mm3) did not significantly affect DTI values (bias = 1.4 [LOA −5.7 to 8.4], P = 0.35) but maintained a strong correlation (ρ = 0.82). Gap size (0 mm vs. 0.6 mm) significantly affects tract volume (bias = 1.8 [LOA −5.4 to 1.8]) but maintains a strong correlation (ρ = 0.93). Comparison of tractography algorithms generated significant differences in tract number, length, and volume while maintaining correlation (ρ = 0.86, 0.99, 0.93, respectively). Comparison of interobserver variability between different tractography software also revealed significant differences while maintaining high correlation (ρ = 0.85–0.98).
Data Conclusion
DTI of the pediatric physis cartilage shows high reproducibility between different imaging and analytic parameters.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.