多囊卵巢综合征中抗苗勒氏管激素与胰岛素抵抗的相关性:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Mohd Zakwan Md Muslim, Aniza Mohammed Jelani, Noorazliyana Shafii, Najib Majdi Yaacob, Noor Azlin Azraini Che Soh, Hanim Afzan Ibrahim
{"title":"多囊卵巢综合征中抗苗勒氏管激素与胰岛素抵抗的相关性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohd Zakwan Md Muslim, Aniza Mohammed Jelani, Noorazliyana Shafii, Najib Majdi Yaacob, Noor Azlin Azraini Che Soh, Hanim Afzan Ibrahim","doi":"10.1186/s13048-024-01436-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidemiological studies regarding the correlation between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and insulin resistance (IR) in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) remain inconsistent. The primary aim of this study was to determine the correlations between AMH and IR in patients with PCOS and to explore the selected factors that influence the correlations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systemic searches of online databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Taylor and Francis, Scopus, and ProQuest) from inception to December 20, 2023 and manual searches of the associated bibliographies to identify relevant studies. We then performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore the sources of heterogeneity, followed by a publication bias risk assessment of the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. We used a random-effects model to estimate the pooled correlations between AMH and the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4835 articles identified, 22 eligible relevant studies from three regions were included and identified as low risk of bias. The random-effects pooled correlation estimate was 0.089 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.040, 0.215), with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 87%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.0475, p < .001). Subgroup analyses showed that the study region did not influence the correlation estimates, and sensitivity analysis showed no significant alteration in the pooled correlation estimate or 95% CI values. No publication bias was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a weak, statistically insignificant correlation between AMH and HOMA-IR in patients with PCOS. The correlation estimates did not vary according to the study participants' regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ovarian Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between anti-mullerian hormone with insulin resistance in polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Zakwan Md Muslim, Aniza Mohammed Jelani, Noorazliyana Shafii, Najib Majdi Yaacob, Noor Azlin Azraini Che Soh, Hanim Afzan Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13048-024-01436-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidemiological studies regarding the correlation between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and insulin resistance (IR) in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) remain inconsistent. The primary aim of this study was to determine the correlations between AMH and IR in patients with PCOS and to explore the selected factors that influence the correlations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systemic searches of online databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Taylor and Francis, Scopus, and ProQuest) from inception to December 20, 2023 and manual searches of the associated bibliographies to identify relevant studies. We then performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore the sources of heterogeneity, followed by a publication bias risk assessment of the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. We used a random-effects model to estimate the pooled correlations between AMH and the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4835 articles identified, 22 eligible relevant studies from three regions were included and identified as low risk of bias. The random-effects pooled correlation estimate was 0.089 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.040, 0.215), with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 87%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.0475, p < .001). Subgroup analyses showed that the study region did not influence the correlation estimates, and sensitivity analysis showed no significant alteration in the pooled correlation estimate or 95% CI values. No publication bias was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a weak, statistically insignificant correlation between AMH and HOMA-IR in patients with PCOS. The correlation estimates did not vary according to the study participants' regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ovarian Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102133/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ovarian Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01436-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ovarian Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01436-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有关多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者抗缪勒氏管激素(AMH)和胰岛素抵抗(IR)之间相关性的流行病学研究仍不一致。本研究的主要目的是确定多囊卵巢综合征患者体内抗穆勒氏管激素(AMH)与胰岛素抵抗(IR)之间的相关性,并探讨影响相关性的选定因素:我们对从开始到 2023 年 12 月 20 日的在线数据库(PubMed、Science Direct、Taylor and Francis、Scopus 和 ProQuest)进行了系统检索,并对相关书目进行了人工检索,以确定相关研究。然后,我们进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析,以探索异质性的来源,随后使用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的关键评估工具对纳入的研究进行了发表偏倚风险评估。我们使用随机效应模型估算了多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者 AMH 与胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)之间的总体相关性:在4835篇已确定的文章中,来自三个地区的22篇符合条件的相关研究被纳入其中,并被确定为低偏倚风险研究。随机效应集合相关性估计值为 0.089(95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.040, 0.215),具有很大的异质性(I2 = 87%;τ2 = 0.0475,P 结论:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者的相关性估计值为 0.089(95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.040, 0.215):在多囊卵巢综合征患者中,AMH与HOMA-IR之间存在微弱的、统计学上不显著的相关性。相关性估计值并不因研究参与者的地区而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between anti-mullerian hormone with insulin resistance in polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Epidemiological studies regarding the correlation between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and insulin resistance (IR) in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) remain inconsistent. The primary aim of this study was to determine the correlations between AMH and IR in patients with PCOS and to explore the selected factors that influence the correlations.

Methods: We conducted systemic searches of online databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Taylor and Francis, Scopus, and ProQuest) from inception to December 20, 2023 and manual searches of the associated bibliographies to identify relevant studies. We then performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore the sources of heterogeneity, followed by a publication bias risk assessment of the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. We used a random-effects model to estimate the pooled correlations between AMH and the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).

Results: Of the 4835 articles identified, 22 eligible relevant studies from three regions were included and identified as low risk of bias. The random-effects pooled correlation estimate was 0.089 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.040, 0.215), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 87%; τ2 = 0.0475, p < .001). Subgroup analyses showed that the study region did not influence the correlation estimates, and sensitivity analysis showed no significant alteration in the pooled correlation estimate or 95% CI values. No publication bias was observed.

Conclusion: There was a weak, statistically insignificant correlation between AMH and HOMA-IR in patients with PCOS. The correlation estimates did not vary according to the study participants' regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ovarian Research
Journal of Ovarian Research REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ovarian Research is an open access, peer reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a forum for high-quality basic and clinical research on ovarian function, abnormalities, and cancer. The journal focuses on research that provides new insights into ovarian functions as well as prevention and treatment of diseases afflicting the organ. Topical areas include, but are not restricted to: Ovary development, hormone secretion and regulation Follicle growth and ovulation Infertility and Polycystic ovarian syndrome Regulation of pituitary and other biological functions by ovarian hormones Ovarian cancer, its prevention, diagnosis and treatment Drug development and screening Role of stem cells in ovary development and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信