丙基丙烷硫代磺酸盐和丙基丙烷硫代磺酸盐对耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌的活性。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Apmis Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1111/apm.13420
Antonio Sorlózano-Puerto, Laura Cerezo-Collado, Elvira Roca-Lagrilliere, Alberto Baños-Arjona, José Gutiérrez-Fernández
{"title":"丙基丙烷硫代磺酸盐和丙基丙烷硫代磺酸盐对耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌的活性。","authors":"Antonio Sorlózano-Puerto,&nbsp;Laura Cerezo-Collado,&nbsp;Elvira Roca-Lagrilliere,&nbsp;Alberto Baños-Arjona,&nbsp;José Gutiérrez-Fernández","doi":"10.1111/apm.13420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organosulfur compounds derived from plants of the <i>Allium</i> genus, such as propyl-propane-thiosulfinate (PTS) and propyl-propane-thiosulfonate (PTSO), have been proposed as an alternative in antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to compare the activity of these substances with other antibiotics against clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant (CAR-R) and carbapenem-susceptible (CAR-S) Gram-negative bacteria. A total of 126 clinical isolates of CAR-R and 155 CAR-S bacteria were selected, including Enterobacterales, <i>A. baumannii</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. The antibiotic susceptibility of all isolates was assessed using the microdilution and Kirby–Bauer methods for PTS, PTSO, amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin. Both PTS and PTSO demonstrated <i>in vitro</i> bactericidal activity against CAR-R <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> and <i>A. baumannii</i>, with no significant difference in activity compared to their response against CAR-S isolates. However, both compounds were less active against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> than against any of the other bacteria, regardless of their resistance to carbapenems. In all cases, the minimum inhibitory concentration values of PTSO were significantly lower than those of PTS. These findings offer valuable information about the potential antibacterial use of these substances, particularly against infections that currently have limited therapeutic options.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":"132 8","pages":"581-593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apm.13420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Activity of propyl-propane-thiosulfinate and propyl-propane-thiosulfonate against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Sorlózano-Puerto,&nbsp;Laura Cerezo-Collado,&nbsp;Elvira Roca-Lagrilliere,&nbsp;Alberto Baños-Arjona,&nbsp;José Gutiérrez-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apm.13420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Organosulfur compounds derived from plants of the <i>Allium</i> genus, such as propyl-propane-thiosulfinate (PTS) and propyl-propane-thiosulfonate (PTSO), have been proposed as an alternative in antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to compare the activity of these substances with other antibiotics against clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant (CAR-R) and carbapenem-susceptible (CAR-S) Gram-negative bacteria. A total of 126 clinical isolates of CAR-R and 155 CAR-S bacteria were selected, including Enterobacterales, <i>A. baumannii</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. The antibiotic susceptibility of all isolates was assessed using the microdilution and Kirby–Bauer methods for PTS, PTSO, amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin. Both PTS and PTSO demonstrated <i>in vitro</i> bactericidal activity against CAR-R <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> and <i>A. baumannii</i>, with no significant difference in activity compared to their response against CAR-S isolates. However, both compounds were less active against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> than against any of the other bacteria, regardless of their resistance to carbapenems. In all cases, the minimum inhibitory concentration values of PTSO were significantly lower than those of PTS. These findings offer valuable information about the potential antibacterial use of these substances, particularly against infections that currently have limited therapeutic options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Apmis\",\"volume\":\"132 8\",\"pages\":\"581-593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apm.13420\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Apmis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apm.13420\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apm.13420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从薤属植物中提取的有机硫化合物,如丙基丙烷硫代磺酸酯(PTS)和丙基丙烷硫代磺酸酯(PTSO),已被提议作为抗生素耐药性的替代品。本研究旨在比较这些物质与其他抗生素对碳青霉烯类耐药(CAR-R)和碳青霉烯类易感(CAR-S)革兰氏阴性菌临床分离株的活性。研究共选取了 126 株耐碳青霉烯类(CAR-R)和 155 株碳青霉烯类(CAR-S)细菌的临床分离株,包括肠杆菌属、鲍曼不动杆菌属和铜绿假单胞菌属。采用微量稀释法和柯比鲍尔法评估了所有分离菌对 PTS、PTSO、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、头孢他啶、头孢唑肟、头孢吡肟、亚胺培南、环丙沙星和阿米卡星的抗生素敏感性。PTS 和 PTSO 对 CAR-R 肠杆菌科细菌和鲍曼不动杆菌都具有体外杀菌活性,与它们对 CAR-S 分离物的活性相比没有显著差异。不过,这两种化合物对铜绿假单胞菌的活性低于对其他细菌的活性,无论它们对碳青霉烯类有无耐药性。在所有情况下,PTSO 的最小抑菌浓度值都明显低于 PTS。这些发现为这些物质的潜在抗菌用途提供了宝贵的信息,尤其是针对目前治疗手段有限的感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Activity of propyl-propane-thiosulfinate and propyl-propane-thiosulfonate against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

Activity of propyl-propane-thiosulfinate and propyl-propane-thiosulfonate against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

Organosulfur compounds derived from plants of the Allium genus, such as propyl-propane-thiosulfinate (PTS) and propyl-propane-thiosulfonate (PTSO), have been proposed as an alternative in antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to compare the activity of these substances with other antibiotics against clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant (CAR-R) and carbapenem-susceptible (CAR-S) Gram-negative bacteria. A total of 126 clinical isolates of CAR-R and 155 CAR-S bacteria were selected, including Enterobacterales, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. The antibiotic susceptibility of all isolates was assessed using the microdilution and Kirby–Bauer methods for PTS, PTSO, amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin. Both PTS and PTSO demonstrated in vitro bactericidal activity against CAR-R Enterobacteriaceae and A. baumannii, with no significant difference in activity compared to their response against CAR-S isolates. However, both compounds were less active against P. aeruginosa than against any of the other bacteria, regardless of their resistance to carbapenems. In all cases, the minimum inhibitory concentration values of PTSO were significantly lower than those of PTS. These findings offer valuable information about the potential antibacterial use of these substances, particularly against infections that currently have limited therapeutic options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信