结合遥感数据的机器学习-动力混合方法在干旱条件下对当季玉米产量预测的评估

IF 5.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yi Luo, Huijing Wang, Junjun Cao, Jinxiao Li, Qun Tian, Guoyong Leng, Dev Niyogi
{"title":"结合遥感数据的机器学习-动力混合方法在干旱条件下对当季玉米产量预测的评估","authors":"Yi Luo, Huijing Wang, Junjun Cao, Jinxiao Li, Qun Tian, Guoyong Leng, Dev Niyogi","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10149-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective yield forecasting is a key strategy for adaptation when facing food loss to climate variability. Currently, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is an emerging remote-sensing index owing to its high relevance to plant photosynthesis, and sensitivity to drought. Despite many studies have focused on drought monitoring and production assessment by SIF, little puts it into practice for in-season yield prediction. In this study, we combined multi-source satellite and meteorological data, especially coupling with subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) dynamic atmospheric prediction climate model (IAP-CAS FGOALS-f2), with an addition of SIF, to predict maize yields in the U.S. Corn Belt, based on the developed machine learning dynamical hybrid model (MHCF). By comparison, we found that SIF performed well in the correlation analysis with yield, with average correlations up to 0.719 in August. Then we utilized different algorithms, different models (S2S data for MHCF, climate data for the Benchmark), and different input combinations to train and predict maize yields. All four algorithms using SIF significantly improved prediction performance. S2S + VIs + SIF combination (FGOALS-f2、NDVI、EVI、SIF) can achieve the best performance, while the XGBoost algorithm reached 0.897 of R<sup>2</sup>. With the best combination, it can achieve 4 months before maize harvest (with R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.85, and RMSE &lt; 13 bu/acre). In 2012, the year had a severe drought, although predictive capability decreased in all the predictions, the models with SIF still maintained robust and improved the prediction (improved R<sup>2</sup> by 5.92%, and RMSE decreased by 18.08% of XGBoost). According to the study, it can be expected, the combination of MHCF and SIF will play a greater role in subseasonal yield prediction. We also provide an operational proposition of hybrid yield forecasting method to fully integrating climate prediction and machine learning for early notice of crop production losses.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of machine learning-dynamical hybrid method incorporating remote sensing data for in-season maize yield prediction under drought\",\"authors\":\"Yi Luo, Huijing Wang, Junjun Cao, Jinxiao Li, Qun Tian, Guoyong Leng, Dev Niyogi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11119-024-10149-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Effective yield forecasting is a key strategy for adaptation when facing food loss to climate variability. Currently, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is an emerging remote-sensing index owing to its high relevance to plant photosynthesis, and sensitivity to drought. Despite many studies have focused on drought monitoring and production assessment by SIF, little puts it into practice for in-season yield prediction. In this study, we combined multi-source satellite and meteorological data, especially coupling with subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) dynamic atmospheric prediction climate model (IAP-CAS FGOALS-f2), with an addition of SIF, to predict maize yields in the U.S. Corn Belt, based on the developed machine learning dynamical hybrid model (MHCF). By comparison, we found that SIF performed well in the correlation analysis with yield, with average correlations up to 0.719 in August. Then we utilized different algorithms, different models (S2S data for MHCF, climate data for the Benchmark), and different input combinations to train and predict maize yields. All four algorithms using SIF significantly improved prediction performance. S2S + VIs + SIF combination (FGOALS-f2、NDVI、EVI、SIF) can achieve the best performance, while the XGBoost algorithm reached 0.897 of R<sup>2</sup>. With the best combination, it can achieve 4 months before maize harvest (with R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.85, and RMSE &lt; 13 bu/acre). In 2012, the year had a severe drought, although predictive capability decreased in all the predictions, the models with SIF still maintained robust and improved the prediction (improved R<sup>2</sup> by 5.92%, and RMSE decreased by 18.08% of XGBoost). According to the study, it can be expected, the combination of MHCF and SIF will play a greater role in subseasonal yield prediction. We also provide an operational proposition of hybrid yield forecasting method to fully integrating climate prediction and machine learning for early notice of crop production losses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10149-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10149-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对气候变异造成的粮食损失,有效的产量预测是一项关键的适应战略。目前,太阳诱导叶绿素荧光(SIF)因其与植物光合作用的高度相关性和对干旱的敏感性而成为一种新兴的遥感指标。尽管许多研究都侧重于利用 SIF 进行干旱监测和产量评估,但很少有研究将其用于季节性产量预测。在本研究中,我们结合了多源卫星和气象数据,特别是与亚季到季节(S2S)动态大气预测气候模型(IAP-CAS FGOALS-f2)的耦合,并加入了 SIF,基于所开发的机器学习动态混合模型(MHCF)预测了美国玉米带的玉米产量。通过比较,我们发现 SIF 在与产量的相关性分析中表现良好,8 月份的平均相关性高达 0.719。然后,我们使用不同的算法、不同的模型(MHCF 使用 S2S 数据,Benchmark 使用气候数据)和不同的输入组合来训练和预测玉米产量。使用 SIF 的所有四种算法都显著提高了预测性能。S2S + VIs + SIF 组合(FGOALS-f2、NDVI、EVI、SIF)可达到最佳性能,而 XGBoost 算法的 R2 达到 0.897。最佳组合可实现玉米收获前 4 个月(R2 值为 0.85,RMSE < 13 bu/acre)。2012 年发生了严重干旱,虽然所有预测结果的预测能力都有所下降,但带有 SIF 的模型仍然保持了稳健性,并提高了预测结果(XGBoost 的 R2 提高了 5.92%,RMSE 降低了 18.08%)。根据研究结果,可以预计 MHCF 和 SIF 的组合将在亚季产量预测中发挥更大的作用。我们还提出了混合产量预测方法的操作建议,以充分整合气候预测和机器学习,及早发现作物产量损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of machine learning-dynamical hybrid method incorporating remote sensing data for in-season maize yield prediction under drought

Evaluation of machine learning-dynamical hybrid method incorporating remote sensing data for in-season maize yield prediction under drought

Effective yield forecasting is a key strategy for adaptation when facing food loss to climate variability. Currently, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is an emerging remote-sensing index owing to its high relevance to plant photosynthesis, and sensitivity to drought. Despite many studies have focused on drought monitoring and production assessment by SIF, little puts it into practice for in-season yield prediction. In this study, we combined multi-source satellite and meteorological data, especially coupling with subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) dynamic atmospheric prediction climate model (IAP-CAS FGOALS-f2), with an addition of SIF, to predict maize yields in the U.S. Corn Belt, based on the developed machine learning dynamical hybrid model (MHCF). By comparison, we found that SIF performed well in the correlation analysis with yield, with average correlations up to 0.719 in August. Then we utilized different algorithms, different models (S2S data for MHCF, climate data for the Benchmark), and different input combinations to train and predict maize yields. All four algorithms using SIF significantly improved prediction performance. S2S + VIs + SIF combination (FGOALS-f2、NDVI、EVI、SIF) can achieve the best performance, while the XGBoost algorithm reached 0.897 of R2. With the best combination, it can achieve 4 months before maize harvest (with R2 value of 0.85, and RMSE < 13 bu/acre). In 2012, the year had a severe drought, although predictive capability decreased in all the predictions, the models with SIF still maintained robust and improved the prediction (improved R2 by 5.92%, and RMSE decreased by 18.08% of XGBoost). According to the study, it can be expected, the combination of MHCF and SIF will play a greater role in subseasonal yield prediction. We also provide an operational proposition of hybrid yield forecasting method to fully integrating climate prediction and machine learning for early notice of crop production losses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信