植物多样性和管理强度对北美牧场生产力规模和稳定性的影响

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Grégory Sonnier, David J. Augustine, Shishir Paudel, Lauren M. Porensky, Maria Silveira, David Toledo, Shefali Azad, Raoul K. Boughton, Dawn M. Browning, Patrick E. Clark, Philip A. Fay, Nicole Kaplan, Kate M. Thibault, Hilary M. Swain, Kristen S. Veum, Elizabeth H. Boughton
{"title":"植物多样性和管理强度对北美牧场生产力规模和稳定性的影响","authors":"Grégory Sonnier,&nbsp;David J. Augustine,&nbsp;Shishir Paudel,&nbsp;Lauren M. Porensky,&nbsp;Maria Silveira,&nbsp;David Toledo,&nbsp;Shefali Azad,&nbsp;Raoul K. Boughton,&nbsp;Dawn M. Browning,&nbsp;Patrick E. Clark,&nbsp;Philip A. Fay,&nbsp;Nicole Kaplan,&nbsp;Kate M. Thibault,&nbsp;Hilary M. Swain,&nbsp;Kristen S. Veum,&nbsp;Elizabeth H. Boughton","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>Grasslands provide important provisioning services worldwide and their management has consequences for these services. Management intensification is a widespread land-use change and has accelerated across North America to meet rising demands on productivity, yet its impact on the relationship between plant diversity and productivity is still unclear. Here, we investigated the relationship between plant diversity and grassland productivity across nine ecoclimatic domains of the continental United States. We also tested the effect of management intensification on diversity and productivity in four case studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We acquired remotely sensed gross primary productivity data (GPP, 1986–2018) and plant diversity data measured at different spatial scales (1, 10, 100, 400 m<sup>2</sup>), as well as climate variables including the Palmer drought index from two ecological networks. We used general linear mixed models to relate GPP to plant diversity across sites. For the case study analysis, we used linear mixed models to relate plant diversity to management intensity, and tested if the management intensity influenced the relationship between GPP (mean and temporal variation) and drought.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across all sites, we observed positive relationships among species richness, productivity, and the temporal stability of mean annual biomass production. These relationships were not affected by the scale at which species richness was observed. In three out of the four case studies, we observed that management effects on species richness were only significant at broader scales (i.e., ≥10 m<sup>2</sup>) with no clear effect found at the commonly used 1-m<sup>2</sup> quadrat scale. In one case study, species-poor, intensively managed pastures presented the highest productivity but were more sensitive to dry conditions than less intensified pastures. However, in other case studies, we did not observe significant effects of management intensity on the magnitude or stability of productivity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Generalization across studies may be difficult and require the development of intensification indices general enough to be applied across diverse management strategies in grazilands. Understanding how management intensification affects grassland productivity will inform the development of sustainable intensification strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avsc.12776","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of plant diversity and management intensity on magnitude and stability of productivity in North American grazing lands\",\"authors\":\"Grégory Sonnier,&nbsp;David J. Augustine,&nbsp;Shishir Paudel,&nbsp;Lauren M. Porensky,&nbsp;Maria Silveira,&nbsp;David Toledo,&nbsp;Shefali Azad,&nbsp;Raoul K. Boughton,&nbsp;Dawn M. Browning,&nbsp;Patrick E. Clark,&nbsp;Philip A. Fay,&nbsp;Nicole Kaplan,&nbsp;Kate M. Thibault,&nbsp;Hilary M. Swain,&nbsp;Kristen S. Veum,&nbsp;Elizabeth H. Boughton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/avsc.12776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Questions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Grasslands provide important provisioning services worldwide and their management has consequences for these services. Management intensification is a widespread land-use change and has accelerated across North America to meet rising demands on productivity, yet its impact on the relationship between plant diversity and productivity is still unclear. Here, we investigated the relationship between plant diversity and grassland productivity across nine ecoclimatic domains of the continental United States. We also tested the effect of management intensification on diversity and productivity in four case studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We acquired remotely sensed gross primary productivity data (GPP, 1986–2018) and plant diversity data measured at different spatial scales (1, 10, 100, 400 m<sup>2</sup>), as well as climate variables including the Palmer drought index from two ecological networks. We used general linear mixed models to relate GPP to plant diversity across sites. For the case study analysis, we used linear mixed models to relate plant diversity to management intensity, and tested if the management intensity influenced the relationship between GPP (mean and temporal variation) and drought.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Across all sites, we observed positive relationships among species richness, productivity, and the temporal stability of mean annual biomass production. These relationships were not affected by the scale at which species richness was observed. In three out of the four case studies, we observed that management effects on species richness were only significant at broader scales (i.e., ≥10 m<sup>2</sup>) with no clear effect found at the commonly used 1-m<sup>2</sup> quadrat scale. In one case study, species-poor, intensively managed pastures presented the highest productivity but were more sensitive to dry conditions than less intensified pastures. However, in other case studies, we did not observe significant effects of management intensity on the magnitude or stability of productivity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Generalization across studies may be difficult and require the development of intensification indices general enough to be applied across diverse management strategies in grazilands. Understanding how management intensification affects grassland productivity will inform the development of sustainable intensification strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Vegetation Science\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avsc.12776\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Vegetation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12776\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题 草原在全球范围内提供重要的供给服务,其管理会对这些服务产生影响。管理集约化是一种普遍的土地利用变化,并在北美地区加速发展,以满足对生产力不断提高的需求,但其对植物多样性和生产力之间关系的影响仍不清楚。在此,我们研究了美国大陆九个生态气候区的植物多样性与草地生产力之间的关系。我们还在四个案例研究中测试了管理强化对多样性和生产力的影响。 方法 我们从两个生态网络中获取了遥感初级生产力总值数据(GPP,1986-2018 年)和不同空间尺度(1、10、100、400 平方米)测量的植物多样性数据,以及包括帕尔默干旱指数在内的气候变量。我们使用一般线性混合模型将不同地点的 GPP 与植物多样性联系起来。在案例研究分析中,我们使用线性混合模型将植物多样性与管理强度联系起来,并检验管理强度是否影响 GPP(平均值和时间变化)与干旱之间的关系。 结果 在所有地点,我们观察到物种丰富度、生产力和平均年生物量产量的时间稳定性之间存在正相关关系。这些关系不受物种丰富度观测尺度的影响。在四项案例研究中的三项研究中,我们观察到管理对物种丰富度的影响仅在较宽的尺度(即≥10 平方米)上显著,而在常用的 1 平方米四分尺度上没有发现明显的影响。在一项案例研究中,物种贫乏、集中管理的牧场生产力最高,但与强度较低的牧场相比,对干旱条件更为敏感。然而,在其他案例研究中,我们没有观察到管理强度对生产力的大小或稳定性有显著影响。 结论 在不同的研究中进行归纳可能比较困难,因此需要制定足够通用的集约化指数,以适用于不同的草场管理策略。了解管理强度如何影响草地生产力将有助于制定可持续的强度战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of plant diversity and management intensity on magnitude and stability of productivity in North American grazing lands

Impact of plant diversity and management intensity on magnitude and stability of productivity in North American grazing lands

Questions

Grasslands provide important provisioning services worldwide and their management has consequences for these services. Management intensification is a widespread land-use change and has accelerated across North America to meet rising demands on productivity, yet its impact on the relationship between plant diversity and productivity is still unclear. Here, we investigated the relationship between plant diversity and grassland productivity across nine ecoclimatic domains of the continental United States. We also tested the effect of management intensification on diversity and productivity in four case studies.

Methods

We acquired remotely sensed gross primary productivity data (GPP, 1986–2018) and plant diversity data measured at different spatial scales (1, 10, 100, 400 m2), as well as climate variables including the Palmer drought index from two ecological networks. We used general linear mixed models to relate GPP to plant diversity across sites. For the case study analysis, we used linear mixed models to relate plant diversity to management intensity, and tested if the management intensity influenced the relationship between GPP (mean and temporal variation) and drought.

Results

Across all sites, we observed positive relationships among species richness, productivity, and the temporal stability of mean annual biomass production. These relationships were not affected by the scale at which species richness was observed. In three out of the four case studies, we observed that management effects on species richness were only significant at broader scales (i.e., ≥10 m2) with no clear effect found at the commonly used 1-m2 quadrat scale. In one case study, species-poor, intensively managed pastures presented the highest productivity but were more sensitive to dry conditions than less intensified pastures. However, in other case studies, we did not observe significant effects of management intensity on the magnitude or stability of productivity.

Conclusions

Generalization across studies may be difficult and require the development of intensification indices general enough to be applied across diverse management strategies in grazilands. Understanding how management intensification affects grassland productivity will inform the development of sustainable intensification strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Vegetation Science
Applied Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信