场外交易市场的社会最优搜索强度

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Shuo Liu
{"title":"场外交易市场的社会最优搜索强度","authors":"Shuo Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the endogenous search intensity of traders in the OTC market, examining both competitive equilibrium and socially optimal scenario. Our study introduces a random search-and-matching model, where traders have the flexibility to <em>ex post</em> choose and adjust their search intensities based on two trader-level states: asset position and preference type. Our findings uncover the following key insights: (1) Changes in the level of search friction and/or the frequency of shocks on traders' preference type may lead to traders switching between high and low search intensities, shifting between the core and periphery of the trading network; and (2) Social optimality is achieved in the absence of intermediation, where no trader simultaneously invests in positive buying intensity and positive selling intensity. In contrast, competitive equilibrium reveals that some traders tend to over-search while others under-search, compared to the socially optimal outcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47890,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094202524000127/pdfft?md5=e32c344f6fa0b4b66ce2ca70c47b45e8&pid=1-s2.0-S1094202524000127-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially optimal search intensity in over-the-counter markets\",\"authors\":\"Shuo Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.red.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates the endogenous search intensity of traders in the OTC market, examining both competitive equilibrium and socially optimal scenario. Our study introduces a random search-and-matching model, where traders have the flexibility to <em>ex post</em> choose and adjust their search intensities based on two trader-level states: asset position and preference type. Our findings uncover the following key insights: (1) Changes in the level of search friction and/or the frequency of shocks on traders' preference type may lead to traders switching between high and low search intensities, shifting between the core and periphery of the trading network; and (2) Social optimality is achieved in the absence of intermediation, where no trader simultaneously invests in positive buying intensity and positive selling intensity. In contrast, competitive equilibrium reveals that some traders tend to over-search while others under-search, compared to the socially optimal outcome.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Economic Dynamics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094202524000127/pdfft?md5=e32c344f6fa0b4b66ce2ca70c47b45e8&pid=1-s2.0-S1094202524000127-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Economic Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094202524000127\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094202524000127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了场外交易市场交易者的内生搜索强度,考察了竞争均衡和社会最优情景。我们的研究引入了一个随机搜索匹配模型,在这个模型中,交易者可以根据资产状况和偏好类型这两种交易者层面的状态灵活地事后选择和调整其搜索强度。我们的研究结果揭示了以下重要观点:(1)搜索摩擦水平和/或交易者偏好类型冲击频率的变化可能导致交易者在高搜索强度和低搜索强度之间切换,在交易网络的核心和外围之间转移;(2)在没有中介的情况下,没有交易者同时投资于正买入强度和正卖出强度,从而实现社会最优。相比之下,竞争均衡显示,与社会最优结果相比,一些交易者倾向于过度搜索,而另一些交易者则搜索不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socially optimal search intensity in over-the-counter markets

This paper investigates the endogenous search intensity of traders in the OTC market, examining both competitive equilibrium and socially optimal scenario. Our study introduces a random search-and-matching model, where traders have the flexibility to ex post choose and adjust their search intensities based on two trader-level states: asset position and preference type. Our findings uncover the following key insights: (1) Changes in the level of search friction and/or the frequency of shocks on traders' preference type may lead to traders switching between high and low search intensities, shifting between the core and periphery of the trading network; and (2) Social optimality is achieved in the absence of intermediation, where no trader simultaneously invests in positive buying intensity and positive selling intensity. In contrast, competitive equilibrium reveals that some traders tend to over-search while others under-search, compared to the socially optimal outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Review of Economic Dynamics publishes meritorious original contributions to dynamic economics. The scope of the journal is intended to be broad and to reflect the view of the Society for Economic Dynamics that the field of economics is unified by the scientific approach to economics. We will publish contributions in any area of economics provided they meet the highest standards of scientific research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信