合作设计中草药病例报告指南(CHM-CARE)

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Brigitte Linder , Guo-Yan Yang , Kathleen Lumiere , Lisa Taylor-Swanson , Sandro Graca , Mike Armour
{"title":"合作设计中草药病例报告指南(CHM-CARE)","authors":"Brigitte Linder ,&nbsp;Guo-Yan Yang ,&nbsp;Kathleen Lumiere ,&nbsp;Lisa Taylor-Swanson ,&nbsp;Sandro Graca ,&nbsp;Mike Armour","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Case reports have a long history in Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), and even into the modern day, case reports are still a preferred format for traditional East Asian medicine (TEAM) practitioners. However, the tradition of case reports in teaching and research is not nearly as common in the English-speaking world as in China, possibly due to the lack of a specific case report guideline. This study aimed to co-design a CHM guideline (CHM-CARE) to assist practitioners in compiling structured and comprehensive case reports.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A two-phased mixed approach was used to develop the case report guideline. In phase one, focus groups of TEAM practitioners were used to determine what components of existing guidelines (e.g., Case Report (CARE) and Case Report in Chinese Medicine (CARC)) were relevant to include, along with any additions or changes. Content analysis of phase 1 provided the checklist items for a two-round Delphi process (Phase 2). All checklist items from the first Delphi round with a median of three or higher were included in the second round, with consensus set at &gt;70 % for inclusion in the final guideline.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 18 CHM practitioners from four countries joined five separate focus group discussions. Focus group discussions led to 98 checklist items being used in the first round of the Delphi process. Fifteen international experts on case reports participated in two rounds of Delphi. A total of 69 checklist items moved forward into the second round where 61 items (88 %) reached consensus and formed the final CHM-CARE guideline.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Key elements of a herbal medicine case report checklist were identified, and a 61-item case report guideline (CHM-CARE) was produced, providing clear guidelines for case reports to TEAM practitioners operating in private practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000349/pdfft?md5=5127bbf54801801e63ce09c599b36635&pid=1-s2.0-S1876382024000349-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative design of a Chinese herbal medicine case report guideline (CHM-CARE)\",\"authors\":\"Brigitte Linder ,&nbsp;Guo-Yan Yang ,&nbsp;Kathleen Lumiere ,&nbsp;Lisa Taylor-Swanson ,&nbsp;Sandro Graca ,&nbsp;Mike Armour\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Case reports have a long history in Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), and even into the modern day, case reports are still a preferred format for traditional East Asian medicine (TEAM) practitioners. However, the tradition of case reports in teaching and research is not nearly as common in the English-speaking world as in China, possibly due to the lack of a specific case report guideline. This study aimed to co-design a CHM guideline (CHM-CARE) to assist practitioners in compiling structured and comprehensive case reports.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A two-phased mixed approach was used to develop the case report guideline. In phase one, focus groups of TEAM practitioners were used to determine what components of existing guidelines (e.g., Case Report (CARE) and Case Report in Chinese Medicine (CARC)) were relevant to include, along with any additions or changes. Content analysis of phase 1 provided the checklist items for a two-round Delphi process (Phase 2). All checklist items from the first Delphi round with a median of three or higher were included in the second round, with consensus set at &gt;70 % for inclusion in the final guideline.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 18 CHM practitioners from four countries joined five separate focus group discussions. Focus group discussions led to 98 checklist items being used in the first round of the Delphi process. Fifteen international experts on case reports participated in two rounds of Delphi. A total of 69 checklist items moved forward into the second round where 61 items (88 %) reached consensus and formed the final CHM-CARE guideline.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Key elements of a herbal medicine case report checklist were identified, and a 61-item case report guideline (CHM-CARE) was produced, providing clear guidelines for case reports to TEAM practitioners operating in private practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000349/pdfft?md5=5127bbf54801801e63ce09c599b36635&pid=1-s2.0-S1876382024000349-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000349\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言病例报告在中药学(CHM)中有着悠久的历史,即使到了现代,病例报告仍然是传统东亚医学(TEAM)从业者的首选形式。然而,可能由于缺乏专门的病例报告指南,病例报告在教学和研究中的传统在英语国家并不像在中国那样普遍。本研究旨在共同设计一份CHM指南(CHM-CARE),以帮助从业人员编写结构化和全面的病例报告。在第一阶段,通过对 TEAM 从业人员进行焦点小组讨论,确定现有指南(如病例报告 (CARE) 和中医病例报告 (CARC))中哪些内容需要纳入,以及是否需要增加或修改。第 1 阶段的内容分析为两轮德尔菲过程(第 2 阶段)提供了核对表项目。来自四个国家的 18 名中医师参加了五个不同的焦点小组讨论。通过焦点小组讨论,98 个核对表项目被用于第一轮德尔菲程序。15 位病例报告方面的国际专家参与了两轮德尔菲过程。共有 69 个核对表项目进入第二轮,其中 61 个项目(88%)达成了共识,并形成了最终的 CHM-CARE 指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaborative design of a Chinese herbal medicine case report guideline (CHM-CARE)

Introduction

Case reports have a long history in Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), and even into the modern day, case reports are still a preferred format for traditional East Asian medicine (TEAM) practitioners. However, the tradition of case reports in teaching and research is not nearly as common in the English-speaking world as in China, possibly due to the lack of a specific case report guideline. This study aimed to co-design a CHM guideline (CHM-CARE) to assist practitioners in compiling structured and comprehensive case reports.

Methods

A two-phased mixed approach was used to develop the case report guideline. In phase one, focus groups of TEAM practitioners were used to determine what components of existing guidelines (e.g., Case Report (CARE) and Case Report in Chinese Medicine (CARC)) were relevant to include, along with any additions or changes. Content analysis of phase 1 provided the checklist items for a two-round Delphi process (Phase 2). All checklist items from the first Delphi round with a median of three or higher were included in the second round, with consensus set at >70 % for inclusion in the final guideline.

Results

A total of 18 CHM practitioners from four countries joined five separate focus group discussions. Focus group discussions led to 98 checklist items being used in the first round of the Delphi process. Fifteen international experts on case reports participated in two rounds of Delphi. A total of 69 checklist items moved forward into the second round where 61 items (88 %) reached consensus and formed the final CHM-CARE guideline.

Conclusion

Key elements of a herbal medicine case report checklist were identified, and a 61-item case report guideline (CHM-CARE) was produced, providing clear guidelines for case reports to TEAM practitioners operating in private practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信