"为什么它不能给我带来意义和目标?前职业治疗师对离开职业的叙述。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Isla Turner, Sarah McMullen-Roach, Amy Baker, Carolyn M. Murray
{"title":"\"为什么它不能给我带来意义和目标?前职业治疗师对离开职业的叙述。","authors":"Isla Turner,&nbsp;Sarah McMullen-Roach,&nbsp;Amy Baker,&nbsp;Carolyn M. Murray","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.12964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The demand for occupational therapy services in Australia has experienced considerable growth in the last decade. Despite an increase in occupational therapy numbers, there remains a substantial workforce shortage. One reason for this shortage is difficulty with the retention of occupational therapists and subsequent workforce attrition. The literature attributes planning to leave as being influenced by high workloads, insufficient time, a negative workplace culture, and stress impacting well-being. However, much of this research is specific to a practice area, such as mental health, and does not explore the experiences of those who have already left. Knowing why people leave occupational therapy will inform our understanding of how to support and retain our occupational therapy workforce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative study was undertaken using narrative inquiry in an Australian context. In 2022, stories were gathered from six former occupational therapists who left within the previous 5 years. Data were collected via semi-structured in-depth interviews using Zoom. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using narrative and thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Four themes were developed: “I just want to help this person”; “there was no real understanding”; “Trying to find where occupational therapy fits for me”; and “I'm not able to continue … anymore.” Participants experienced dissonance between enacting their occupational therapy values and the expectations of their management. They were challenged by unsupportive workplace cultures and leadership styles that undermined their autonomy. They responded with resilience, and trying new ways to continue being occupational therapists, but became increasingly uncomfortable and stressed until they reached a tipping point where they decided to leave.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Increasing leadership development within the profession is essential, along with creative strategies for meeting funding requirements and fulfilling occupational therapy values. Workplaces that provide autonomy and respect the occupational therapy role are likely to support retention.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.12964","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Why is it not bringing me meaning and purpose?” Former occupational therapists' narratives of leaving the profession\",\"authors\":\"Isla Turner,&nbsp;Sarah McMullen-Roach,&nbsp;Amy Baker,&nbsp;Carolyn M. Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.12964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The demand for occupational therapy services in Australia has experienced considerable growth in the last decade. Despite an increase in occupational therapy numbers, there remains a substantial workforce shortage. One reason for this shortage is difficulty with the retention of occupational therapists and subsequent workforce attrition. The literature attributes planning to leave as being influenced by high workloads, insufficient time, a negative workplace culture, and stress impacting well-being. However, much of this research is specific to a practice area, such as mental health, and does not explore the experiences of those who have already left. Knowing why people leave occupational therapy will inform our understanding of how to support and retain our occupational therapy workforce.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A qualitative study was undertaken using narrative inquiry in an Australian context. In 2022, stories were gathered from six former occupational therapists who left within the previous 5 years. Data were collected via semi-structured in-depth interviews using Zoom. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using narrative and thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four themes were developed: “I just want to help this person”; “there was no real understanding”; “Trying to find where occupational therapy fits for me”; and “I'm not able to continue … anymore.” Participants experienced dissonance between enacting their occupational therapy values and the expectations of their management. They were challenged by unsupportive workplace cultures and leadership styles that undermined their autonomy. They responded with resilience, and trying new ways to continue being occupational therapists, but became increasingly uncomfortable and stressed until they reached a tipping point where they decided to leave.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Increasing leadership development within the profession is essential, along with creative strategies for meeting funding requirements and fulfilling occupational therapy values. Workplaces that provide autonomy and respect the occupational therapy role are likely to support retention.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.12964\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12964\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在过去十年中,澳大利亚对职业治疗服务的需求有了显著增长。尽管职业治疗师的人数有所增加,但劳动力仍然严重短缺。造成这种短缺的原因之一是难以留住职业治疗师,继而造成劳动力流失。文献指出,计划离职的原因包括工作量大、时间不足、工作场所文化消极以及压力影响身心健康。然而,这些研究大多是针对心理健康等实践领域的,并没有探讨那些已经离职的人的经历。了解人们离开职业治疗的原因将有助于我们理解如何支持和留住职业治疗人员:在澳大利亚的背景下,采用叙事调查法开展了一项定性研究。2022 年,我们收集了六名在过去五年内离职的前职业治疗师的故事。数据是通过使用 Zoom 进行半结构化深度访谈收集的。对访谈进行了录音和逐字记录。采用叙事和主题分析法对数据进行分析:形成了四个主题:"我只是想帮助这个人";"没有真正的理解";"试图找到适合我的职业疗法";以及 "我无法再继续......"。参与者在践行其职业疗法价值观与管理层的期望之间感到不协调。他们受到了不支持性工作场所文化和削弱其自主性的领导风格的挑战。他们以坚韧不拔的精神应对,并尝试新的方式继续做职业治疗师,但却变得越来越不自在,压力越来越大,直到达到一个临界点,他们才决定离开:加强行业内的领导力培养是至关重要的,同时还要采取创造性的策略来满足资金需求和实现职业治疗的价值。提供自主权并尊重职业治疗师角色的工作场所可能有助于留住人才。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

“Why is it not bringing me meaning and purpose?” Former occupational therapists' narratives of leaving the profession

“Why is it not bringing me meaning and purpose?” Former occupational therapists' narratives of leaving the profession

Introduction

The demand for occupational therapy services in Australia has experienced considerable growth in the last decade. Despite an increase in occupational therapy numbers, there remains a substantial workforce shortage. One reason for this shortage is difficulty with the retention of occupational therapists and subsequent workforce attrition. The literature attributes planning to leave as being influenced by high workloads, insufficient time, a negative workplace culture, and stress impacting well-being. However, much of this research is specific to a practice area, such as mental health, and does not explore the experiences of those who have already left. Knowing why people leave occupational therapy will inform our understanding of how to support and retain our occupational therapy workforce.

Methods

A qualitative study was undertaken using narrative inquiry in an Australian context. In 2022, stories were gathered from six former occupational therapists who left within the previous 5 years. Data were collected via semi-structured in-depth interviews using Zoom. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using narrative and thematic analysis.

Findings

Four themes were developed: “I just want to help this person”; “there was no real understanding”; “Trying to find where occupational therapy fits for me”; and “I'm not able to continue … anymore.” Participants experienced dissonance between enacting their occupational therapy values and the expectations of their management. They were challenged by unsupportive workplace cultures and leadership styles that undermined their autonomy. They responded with resilience, and trying new ways to continue being occupational therapists, but became increasingly uncomfortable and stressed until they reached a tipping point where they decided to leave.

Conclusion

Increasing leadership development within the profession is essential, along with creative strategies for meeting funding requirements and fulfilling occupational therapy values. Workplaces that provide autonomy and respect the occupational therapy role are likely to support retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信