临床感染中的伯克霍尔德氏菌复合体分离菌种分布和抗菌药敏感性:印度南部一家三级医院的经验。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Mahalakshmi Kumaresan, Meerabai Manoharan, Madhan Sugumar, Sujatha Sistla
{"title":"临床感染中的伯克霍尔德氏菌复合体分离菌种分布和抗菌药敏感性:印度南部一家三级医院的经验。","authors":"Mahalakshmi Kumaresan,&nbsp;Meerabai Manoharan,&nbsp;Madhan Sugumar,&nbsp;Sujatha Sistla","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><em>Burkholderia cepacia</em> complex (Bcc) is a diverse group of environmental bacteria associated with opportunistic infections. The identification of Bcc using conventional methods poses challenges. Bcc infections are difficult to treat due to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. The study aimed to investigate the species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Bcc isolates.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 153 Bcc isolates obtained from clinical samples were analysed. Species identification was carried out using automated methods, including MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>Burkholderia cenocepacia</em> (70.5%) emerged as the most prevalent species, followed by <em>Burkholderia contaminans</em> (9.8%) and <em>Burkholderia cepacia</em> (7.2%)<em>.</em> Ventilator-associated pneumonia (38.6%) was the most common infection, followed by sepsis (28.1%)<em>.</em> Co-existence of Bcc with other pathogens in many cases suggested potential co-infection scenarios. Antimicrobial susceptibility revealed that ceftazidime, co-trimoxazole and meropenem were the most effective drugs, while levofloxacin proved to be the least effective. Moderate susceptibility was noted to minocycline, with 4.6% of isolates exhibiting multi-drug resistance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence, clinical associations, and antibiotic susceptibility of Bcc in India. It highlights the importance of Bcc as a nosocomial pathogen, especially in vulnerable patient populations. The findings contribute to understanding Bcc infections, their distribution, and emphasize the necessity for accurate identification methods in clinical settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13284,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates in clinical infections: Experience from a tertiary care hospital, Southern India\",\"authors\":\"Mahalakshmi Kumaresan,&nbsp;Meerabai Manoharan,&nbsp;Madhan Sugumar,&nbsp;Sujatha Sistla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><em>Burkholderia cepacia</em> complex (Bcc) is a diverse group of environmental bacteria associated with opportunistic infections. The identification of Bcc using conventional methods poses challenges. Bcc infections are difficult to treat due to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. The study aimed to investigate the species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Bcc isolates.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 153 Bcc isolates obtained from clinical samples were analysed. Species identification was carried out using automated methods, including MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>Burkholderia cenocepacia</em> (70.5%) emerged as the most prevalent species, followed by <em>Burkholderia contaminans</em> (9.8%) and <em>Burkholderia cepacia</em> (7.2%)<em>.</em> Ventilator-associated pneumonia (38.6%) was the most common infection, followed by sepsis (28.1%)<em>.</em> Co-existence of Bcc with other pathogens in many cases suggested potential co-infection scenarios. Antimicrobial susceptibility revealed that ceftazidime, co-trimoxazole and meropenem were the most effective drugs, while levofloxacin proved to be the least effective. Moderate susceptibility was noted to minocycline, with 4.6% of isolates exhibiting multi-drug resistance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence, clinical associations, and antibiotic susceptibility of Bcc in India. It highlights the importance of Bcc as a nosocomial pathogen, especially in vulnerable patient populations. The findings contribute to understanding Bcc infections, their distribution, and emphasize the necessity for accurate identification methods in clinical settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255085724000884\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255085724000884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:伯克霍尔德氏菌复合菌(Bcc)是一类与机会性感染有关的多种环境细菌。使用传统方法鉴定 Bcc 是一项挑战。伯克霍尔德氏菌感染因其固有的抗生素耐药性而难以治疗。本研究旨在调查临床 Bcc 分离物的种类分布和抗菌药敏感性:方法:分析了从临床样本中分离出的 153 株 Bcc。采用 MALDI-TOF MS 和 VITEK2 等自动方法进行菌种鉴定:结果:伯克霍尔德氏菌(70.5%)是最常见的菌种,其次是污染伯克霍尔德氏菌(9.8%)和伯克霍尔德氏头孢菌(7.2%)。呼吸机相关肺炎(38.6%)是最常见的感染,其次是败血症(28.1%)。在许多病例中,Bcc与其他病原体同时存在,这表明可能存在合并感染的情况。抗菌药物的药敏性显示,头孢他啶、联合曲唑和美罗培南是最有效的药物,而左氧氟沙星被证明是最无效的药物。对米诺环素有中度敏感性,4.6%的分离株表现出多重耐药性:本研究为了解印度 Bcc 的流行情况、临床关联和抗生素敏感性提供了宝贵的资料。它强调了Bcc作为一种院内病原体的重要性,尤其是在易感患者群体中。研究结果有助于了解Bcc感染及其分布情况,并强调了在临床环境中采用准确识别方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates in clinical infections: Experience from a tertiary care hospital, Southern India

Purpose

Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is a diverse group of environmental bacteria associated with opportunistic infections. The identification of Bcc using conventional methods poses challenges. Bcc infections are difficult to treat due to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. The study aimed to investigate the species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Bcc isolates.

Methods

A total of 153 Bcc isolates obtained from clinical samples were analysed. Species identification was carried out using automated methods, including MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method.

Results

Burkholderia cenocepacia (70.5%) emerged as the most prevalent species, followed by Burkholderia contaminans (9.8%) and Burkholderia cepacia (7.2%). Ventilator-associated pneumonia (38.6%) was the most common infection, followed by sepsis (28.1%). Co-existence of Bcc with other pathogens in many cases suggested potential co-infection scenarios. Antimicrobial susceptibility revealed that ceftazidime, co-trimoxazole and meropenem were the most effective drugs, while levofloxacin proved to be the least effective. Moderate susceptibility was noted to minocycline, with 4.6% of isolates exhibiting multi-drug resistance.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence, clinical associations, and antibiotic susceptibility of Bcc in India. It highlights the importance of Bcc as a nosocomial pathogen, especially in vulnerable patient populations. The findings contribute to understanding Bcc infections, their distribution, and emphasize the necessity for accurate identification methods in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of high standard in the form of original research, multicentric studies, meta analysis, are accepted. Current reports can be submitted as brief communications. Case reports must include review of current literature, clinical details, outcome and follow up. Letters to the editor must be a comment on or pertain to a manuscript already published in the IJMM or in relation to preliminary communication of a larger study. Review articles, Special Articles or Guest Editorials are accepted on invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信