远程医疗是否适合慢性炎症性皮肤病患者?系统综述。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Wynanda A Van Enst, Ying Chao Weng, Sophie A C Wanten, Marieke M B Seyger, Ewout M Baerveldt, Bernd W M Arents, Elke M G J De Jong, Juul M P A Van den Reek
{"title":"远程医疗是否适合慢性炎症性皮肤病患者?系统综述。","authors":"Wynanda A Van Enst, Ying Chao Weng, Sophie A C Wanten, Marieke M B Seyger, Ewout M Baerveldt, Bernd W M Arents, Elke M G J De Jong, Juul M P A Van den Reek","doi":"10.2340/actadv.v104.23901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telemedicine, the provision of remote healthcare, has gained prominence, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It has the potential to replace routine in-person follow-up visits for patients with chronic inflammatory skin conditions. However, it remains unclear whether telemedicine can effectively substitute in-person consultations for this patient group. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness and safety of telemedicine compared with traditional in-person care for chronic inflammatory skin diseases. A comprehensive search in various databases identified 11 articles, including 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 clinical controlled trial (CCT). These studies evaluated telemedicine's impact on patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, with varying methods like video consultations and digital platforms. The findings tentatively suggest that telemedicine does not seem to be inferior compared with in-person care, particularly in terms of condition severity and quality of life for patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent uncertainties in the evidence. There are indications that telemedicine can offer benefits such as cost-effectiveness, time savings, and reduced travel distances, but it is important to recognize these findings as preliminary, necessitating further validation through more extensive research.</p>","PeriodicalId":6944,"journal":{"name":"Acta dermato-venereologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Telemedicine Suitable for Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Skin Conditions? A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Wynanda A Van Enst, Ying Chao Weng, Sophie A C Wanten, Marieke M B Seyger, Ewout M Baerveldt, Bernd W M Arents, Elke M G J De Jong, Juul M P A Van den Reek\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/actadv.v104.23901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Telemedicine, the provision of remote healthcare, has gained prominence, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It has the potential to replace routine in-person follow-up visits for patients with chronic inflammatory skin conditions. However, it remains unclear whether telemedicine can effectively substitute in-person consultations for this patient group. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness and safety of telemedicine compared with traditional in-person care for chronic inflammatory skin diseases. A comprehensive search in various databases identified 11 articles, including 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 clinical controlled trial (CCT). These studies evaluated telemedicine's impact on patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, with varying methods like video consultations and digital platforms. The findings tentatively suggest that telemedicine does not seem to be inferior compared with in-person care, particularly in terms of condition severity and quality of life for patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent uncertainties in the evidence. There are indications that telemedicine can offer benefits such as cost-effectiveness, time savings, and reduced travel distances, but it is important to recognize these findings as preliminary, necessitating further validation through more extensive research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta dermato-venereologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110807/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta dermato-venereologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v104.23901\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta dermato-venereologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v104.23901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行的推动下,远程医疗(提供远程医疗服务)的地位日益突出。它有可能取代慢性炎症性皮肤病患者的常规亲诊随访。然而,远程医疗是否能有效取代对这一患者群体的亲诊,目前仍不清楚。本系统性综述评估了远程医疗与传统面诊相比在治疗慢性炎症性皮肤病方面的有效性和安全性。通过对各种数据库的全面检索,共发现了 11 篇文章,其中包括 5 项随机对照试验 (RCT) 和 1 项临床对照试验 (CCT)。这些研究通过视频会诊和数字平台等不同方法,评估了远程医疗对银屑病和特应性皮炎患者的影响。研究结果初步表明,远程医疗与面对面治疗相比似乎并不逊色,尤其是在慢性炎症性皮肤病患者的病情严重程度和生活质量方面。不过,由于证据本身存在不确定性,在解释这些结果时应谨慎。有迹象表明,远程医疗可以带来成本效益、节省时间和缩短旅行距离等好处,但重要的是要认识到这些结果只是初步的,需要通过更广泛的研究来进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Telemedicine Suitable for Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Skin Conditions? A Systematic Review.

Telemedicine, the provision of remote healthcare, has gained prominence, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It has the potential to replace routine in-person follow-up visits for patients with chronic inflammatory skin conditions. However, it remains unclear whether telemedicine can effectively substitute in-person consultations for this patient group. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness and safety of telemedicine compared with traditional in-person care for chronic inflammatory skin diseases. A comprehensive search in various databases identified 11 articles, including 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 clinical controlled trial (CCT). These studies evaluated telemedicine's impact on patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, with varying methods like video consultations and digital platforms. The findings tentatively suggest that telemedicine does not seem to be inferior compared with in-person care, particularly in terms of condition severity and quality of life for patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent uncertainties in the evidence. There are indications that telemedicine can offer benefits such as cost-effectiveness, time savings, and reduced travel distances, but it is important to recognize these findings as preliminary, necessitating further validation through more extensive research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta dermato-venereologica
Acta dermato-venereologica 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Dermato-Venereologica publishes high-quality manuscripts in English in the field of Dermatology and Venereology, dealing with new observations on basic dermatological and venereological research, as well as clinical investigations. Each volume also features a number of Review articles in special areas, as well as short Letters to the Editor to stimulate debate and to disseminate important clinical observations. Acta Dermato-Venereologica has rapid publication times and is amply illustrated with a large number of colour photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信