利拉鲁肽和度拉鲁肽抗炎效果的比较分析

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yi Hou, Yini Fan, Yuan Cheng, Xiaoyue Peng, Chunyan Shan, Yanhui Yang
{"title":"利拉鲁肽和度拉鲁肽抗炎效果的比较分析","authors":"Yi Hou, Yini Fan, Yuan Cheng, Xiaoyue Peng, Chunyan Shan, Yanhui Yang","doi":"10.1536/ihj.23-576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p>Inflammation plays a pathophysiological role in atherosclerosis and its clinical consequences. In addition to glycemic control, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are of wide concern for cardioprotective effects. The structure, half-life, homology, and clinical efficacy of GLP-1RAs exhibit remarkable disparity. Several studies have compared the disparities in anti-inflammatory effects between daily and weekly GLP-1RAs. This study aimed to compare the similarities and differences between liraglutide and dulaglutide in terms of inhibiting atherosclerotic inflammation and improving co-cultured endothelial cell function. The expression of inflammation markers was examined by immunofluorescence, Western blotting, and real-time PCR. The tube-forming ability of endothelial cells was tested on Matrigel. The results verify that 10/50/100 nmol/L liraglutide and 100 nmol/L dulaglutide markedly suppressed the expression of inflammatory factors in LPS-induced atherosclerosis after 24 and 72 hours, respectively. Moreover, they promoted the polarization of M1 macrophages toward the M2 phenotype and improved the function of co-cultured endothelial cells. Both liraglutide and dulaglutide ameliorate atherosclerosis development. The difference between the two resided in the extended intervention duration required to observe the effect of dulaglutide, and liraglutide demonstrated a superior dose-dependent manner. We provide a potential strategy to understand the dynamics of drug action and possible timing administration.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Liraglutide and Dulaglutide\",\"authors\":\"Yi Hou, Yini Fan, Yuan Cheng, Xiaoyue Peng, Chunyan Shan, Yanhui Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1536/ihj.23-576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"</p><p>Inflammation plays a pathophysiological role in atherosclerosis and its clinical consequences. In addition to glycemic control, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are of wide concern for cardioprotective effects. The structure, half-life, homology, and clinical efficacy of GLP-1RAs exhibit remarkable disparity. Several studies have compared the disparities in anti-inflammatory effects between daily and weekly GLP-1RAs. This study aimed to compare the similarities and differences between liraglutide and dulaglutide in terms of inhibiting atherosclerotic inflammation and improving co-cultured endothelial cell function. The expression of inflammation markers was examined by immunofluorescence, Western blotting, and real-time PCR. The tube-forming ability of endothelial cells was tested on Matrigel. The results verify that 10/50/100 nmol/L liraglutide and 100 nmol/L dulaglutide markedly suppressed the expression of inflammatory factors in LPS-induced atherosclerosis after 24 and 72 hours, respectively. Moreover, they promoted the polarization of M1 macrophages toward the M2 phenotype and improved the function of co-cultured endothelial cells. Both liraglutide and dulaglutide ameliorate atherosclerosis development. The difference between the two resided in the extended intervention duration required to observe the effect of dulaglutide, and liraglutide demonstrated a superior dose-dependent manner. We provide a potential strategy to understand the dynamics of drug action and possible timing administration.</p>\\n<p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International heart journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.23-576\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.23-576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

炎症在动脉粥样硬化及其临床后果中起着病理生理作用。除了控制血糖外,胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)的心脏保护作用也受到广泛关注。GLP-1RAs 的结构、半衰期、同源性和临床疗效存在显著差异。有几项研究比较了每日服用和每周服用 GLP-1RAs 在抗炎效果上的差异。本研究旨在比较利拉鲁肽和度拉鲁肽在抑制动脉粥样硬化炎症和改善共培养内皮细胞功能方面的异同。研究人员通过免疫荧光、Western 印迹和实时 PCR 检测了炎症标志物的表达。在 Matrigel 上测试了内皮细胞的成管能力。结果证实,10/50/100 nmol/L 利拉鲁肽和100 nmol/L 度拉鲁肽分别在24小时和72小时后明显抑制了LPS诱导的动脉粥样硬化中炎症因子的表达。此外,它们还能促进 M1 巨噬细胞向 M2 表型极化,并改善共培养内皮细胞的功能。利拉鲁肽和度拉鲁肽都能改善动脉粥样硬化的发展。两者的区别在于观察度拉鲁肽效果所需的干预时间更长,而且利拉鲁肽表现出更优越的剂量依赖性。我们为了解药物作用的动态和可能的给药时机提供了一种潜在的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Liraglutide and Dulaglutide

Inflammation plays a pathophysiological role in atherosclerosis and its clinical consequences. In addition to glycemic control, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are of wide concern for cardioprotective effects. The structure, half-life, homology, and clinical efficacy of GLP-1RAs exhibit remarkable disparity. Several studies have compared the disparities in anti-inflammatory effects between daily and weekly GLP-1RAs. This study aimed to compare the similarities and differences between liraglutide and dulaglutide in terms of inhibiting atherosclerotic inflammation and improving co-cultured endothelial cell function. The expression of inflammation markers was examined by immunofluorescence, Western blotting, and real-time PCR. The tube-forming ability of endothelial cells was tested on Matrigel. The results verify that 10/50/100 nmol/L liraglutide and 100 nmol/L dulaglutide markedly suppressed the expression of inflammatory factors in LPS-induced atherosclerosis after 24 and 72 hours, respectively. Moreover, they promoted the polarization of M1 macrophages toward the M2 phenotype and improved the function of co-cultured endothelial cells. Both liraglutide and dulaglutide ameliorate atherosclerosis development. The difference between the two resided in the extended intervention duration required to observe the effect of dulaglutide, and liraglutide demonstrated a superior dose-dependent manner. We provide a potential strategy to understand the dynamics of drug action and possible timing administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International heart journal
International heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信