Nicolaus Jennings;David Wetz;Rick Langley;Nancy LaFlair;John Heinzel
{"title":"来自 1000 V 阀控式铅酸电池系统的直流弧闪测量结果","authors":"Nicolaus Jennings;David Wetz;Rick Langley;Nancy LaFlair;John Heinzel","doi":"10.1109/OJIA.2024.3400208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the Navy moves forward with implementing electrochemical energy sources in their power systems, a need to understand the hazards present to electric workers comes to light. Understanding the effects these sources have on arc flash hazards drives the need to study relevant energy sources that are deployed on naval platforms. A 1000-V valve regulated lead acid (VRLA) battery system presents the greatest need to study as incident energy models can suggest dramatic personal protective equipment (PPE) especially with the inclusion of scale factors. As a part of a collaborative effort between the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) arc flash studies of VRLA battery systems at voltages as high as 936 V have been performed. Findings show that below 800 V, the battery sourced incident energy as high as 0.26 cal/cm\n<sup>2</sup>\n. Above 800 V, incident energy surpassed 1.2 cal/cm\n<sup>2</sup>\n and approached category 1 PPE (4 cal/cm\n<sup>2</sup>\n). A model derived from this work is used to emphasize the impact enclosure based scale factors have on incident energy estimates. This work has also compared relevant dc incident energy models to the measured incident energy sourced from this battery system.","PeriodicalId":100629,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","volume":"5 ","pages":"168-176"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10529540","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DC Arc Flash Measurements From a 1000 V Valve Regulated Lead Acid Battery System\",\"authors\":\"Nicolaus Jennings;David Wetz;Rick Langley;Nancy LaFlair;John Heinzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJIA.2024.3400208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the Navy moves forward with implementing electrochemical energy sources in their power systems, a need to understand the hazards present to electric workers comes to light. Understanding the effects these sources have on arc flash hazards drives the need to study relevant energy sources that are deployed on naval platforms. A 1000-V valve regulated lead acid (VRLA) battery system presents the greatest need to study as incident energy models can suggest dramatic personal protective equipment (PPE) especially with the inclusion of scale factors. As a part of a collaborative effort between the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) arc flash studies of VRLA battery systems at voltages as high as 936 V have been performed. Findings show that below 800 V, the battery sourced incident energy as high as 0.26 cal/cm\\n<sup>2</sup>\\n. Above 800 V, incident energy surpassed 1.2 cal/cm\\n<sup>2</sup>\\n and approached category 1 PPE (4 cal/cm\\n<sup>2</sup>\\n). A model derived from this work is used to emphasize the impact enclosure based scale factors have on incident energy estimates. This work has also compared relevant dc incident energy models to the measured incident energy sourced from this battery system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"168-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10529540\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10529540/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10529540/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着海军在其电力系统中采用电化学能源,了解电工面临的危险的必要性逐渐凸显出来。了解这些能源对弧闪危险的影响,就需要对海军平台上部署的相关能源进行研究。1000 V 阀控式铅酸 (VRLA) 电池系统是最需要研究的,因为事故能量模型可以建议使用剧烈的个人防护设备 (PPE),特别是在包含比例因素的情况下。作为美国电力研究所 (EPRI) 和德克萨斯大学阿灵顿分校 (UTA) 合作项目的一部分,对电压高达 936 V 的 VRLA 电池系统进行了弧闪研究。研究结果表明,电压低于 800 V 时,电池产生的入射能量高达 0.26 cal/cm2。高于 800 V 时,入射能量超过 1.2 cal/cm2,接近 1 类 PPE(4 cal/cm2)。从这项工作中得出的模型用于强调基于外壳的比例系数对入射能量估计值的影响。这项工作还将相关直流入射能量模型与来自该电池系统的测量入射能量进行了比较。
DC Arc Flash Measurements From a 1000 V Valve Regulated Lead Acid Battery System
As the Navy moves forward with implementing electrochemical energy sources in their power systems, a need to understand the hazards present to electric workers comes to light. Understanding the effects these sources have on arc flash hazards drives the need to study relevant energy sources that are deployed on naval platforms. A 1000-V valve regulated lead acid (VRLA) battery system presents the greatest need to study as incident energy models can suggest dramatic personal protective equipment (PPE) especially with the inclusion of scale factors. As a part of a collaborative effort between the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) arc flash studies of VRLA battery systems at voltages as high as 936 V have been performed. Findings show that below 800 V, the battery sourced incident energy as high as 0.26 cal/cm
2
. Above 800 V, incident energy surpassed 1.2 cal/cm
2
and approached category 1 PPE (4 cal/cm
2
). A model derived from this work is used to emphasize the impact enclosure based scale factors have on incident energy estimates. This work has also compared relevant dc incident energy models to the measured incident energy sourced from this battery system.