人工智能欺骗:实例、风险和潜在解决方案调查

IF 6.7 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Peter S. Park, Simon Goldstein, Aidan O’Gara, Michael Chen, Dan Hendrycks
{"title":"人工智能欺骗:实例、风险和潜在解决方案调查","authors":"Peter S. Park, Simon Goldstein, Aidan O’Gara, Michael Chen, Dan Hendrycks","doi":"10.1016/j.patter.2024.100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper argues that a range of current AI systems have learned how to deceive humans. We define deception as the systematic inducement of false beliefs in the pursuit of some outcome other than the truth. We first survey empirical examples of AI deception, discussing both special-use AI systems (including Meta’s CICERO) and general-purpose AI systems (including large language models). Next, we detail several risks from AI deception, such as fraud, election tampering, and losing control of AI. Finally, we outline several potential solutions: first, regulatory frameworks should subject AI systems that are capable of deception to robust risk-assessment requirements; second, policymakers should implement bot-or-not laws; and finally, policymakers should prioritize the funding of relevant research, including tools to detect AI deception and to make AI systems less deceptive. Policymakers, researchers, and the broader public should work proactively to prevent AI deception from destabilizing the shared foundations of our society.</p>","PeriodicalId":36242,"journal":{"name":"Patterns","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI deception: A survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions\",\"authors\":\"Peter S. Park, Simon Goldstein, Aidan O’Gara, Michael Chen, Dan Hendrycks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.patter.2024.100988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper argues that a range of current AI systems have learned how to deceive humans. We define deception as the systematic inducement of false beliefs in the pursuit of some outcome other than the truth. We first survey empirical examples of AI deception, discussing both special-use AI systems (including Meta’s CICERO) and general-purpose AI systems (including large language models). Next, we detail several risks from AI deception, such as fraud, election tampering, and losing control of AI. Finally, we outline several potential solutions: first, regulatory frameworks should subject AI systems that are capable of deception to robust risk-assessment requirements; second, policymakers should implement bot-or-not laws; and finally, policymakers should prioritize the funding of relevant research, including tools to detect AI deception and to make AI systems less deceptive. Policymakers, researchers, and the broader public should work proactively to prevent AI deception from destabilizing the shared foundations of our society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patterns\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patterns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.100988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.100988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,当前一系列人工智能系统已经学会了如何欺骗人类。我们将欺骗定义为系统性地诱导错误信念,以追求某种非真相的结果。我们首先调查了人工智能欺骗的实证案例,讨论了特殊用途人工智能系统(包括 Meta 的 CICERO)和通用人工智能系统(包括大型语言模型)。接下来,我们详细介绍了人工智能欺骗的几种风险,如欺诈、篡改选举和失去对人工智能的控制。最后,我们概述了几种潜在的解决方案:首先,监管框架应该对能够进行欺骗的人工智能系统提出严格的风险评估要求;其次,政策制定者应该实施 "要么机器人,要么不机器人 "的法律;最后,政策制定者应该优先资助相关研究,包括检测人工智能欺骗行为和减少人工智能系统欺骗性的工具。政策制定者、研究人员和广大公众应积极努力,防止人工智能欺骗行为破坏我们社会的共同基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI deception: A survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions

This paper argues that a range of current AI systems have learned how to deceive humans. We define deception as the systematic inducement of false beliefs in the pursuit of some outcome other than the truth. We first survey empirical examples of AI deception, discussing both special-use AI systems (including Meta’s CICERO) and general-purpose AI systems (including large language models). Next, we detail several risks from AI deception, such as fraud, election tampering, and losing control of AI. Finally, we outline several potential solutions: first, regulatory frameworks should subject AI systems that are capable of deception to robust risk-assessment requirements; second, policymakers should implement bot-or-not laws; and finally, policymakers should prioritize the funding of relevant research, including tools to detect AI deception and to make AI systems less deceptive. Policymakers, researchers, and the broader public should work proactively to prevent AI deception from destabilizing the shared foundations of our society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patterns
Patterns Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信