论蒙兹对解释与诠释的区分

IF 0.4 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1163/18722636-12341517

Giovanni Mion

{"title":"论蒙兹对解释与诠释的区分","authors":"Giovanni Mion","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I will explore Peter Munz’s philosophy of history and in particular, I will focus on Munz’s distinction between explanation and interpretation in history and the other social sciences. Among other things, I will attempt to show that its methodological implications have not been fully appreciated. Moreover, I will argue that Munz’s distinction offers a possible solution to some of the most outstanding problems in the social sciences, including the distinction between the natural and the social sciences (including history), and the role of causes vs. reasons in understanding agency.","PeriodicalId":43541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Munz’s Distinction between Explanation and Interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Mion\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18722636-12341517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I will explore Peter Munz’s philosophy of history and in particular, I will focus on Munz’s distinction between explanation and interpretation in history and the other social sciences. Among other things, I will attempt to show that its methodological implications have not been fully appreciated. Moreover, I will argue that Munz’s distinction offers a possible solution to some of the most outstanding problems in the social sciences, including the distinction between the natural and the social sciences (including history), and the role of causes vs. reasons in understanding agency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Philosophy of History\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Philosophy of History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341517\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中，我将探讨彼得-蒙茨的历史哲学，特别是蒙茨对历史学和其他社会科学中解释和阐释的区分。除其他事项外，我将试图说明其方法论意义尚未得到充分认识。此外，我还将论证，芒茨的区分为社会科学中一些最突出的问题提供了可能的解决方案，包括自然科学与社会科学（包括历史学）之间的区分，以及原因与理由在理解代理中的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

On Munz’s Distinction between Explanation and Interpretation

In this paper, I will explore Peter Munz’s philosophy of history and in particular, I will focus on Munz’s distinction between explanation and interpretation in history and the other social sciences. Among other things, I will attempt to show that its methodological implications have not been fully appreciated. Moreover, I will argue that Munz’s distinction offers a possible solution to some of the most outstanding problems in the social sciences, including the distinction between the natural and the social sciences (including history), and the role of causes vs. reasons in understanding agency.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the Philosophy of History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy of history is a rapidly expanding area. There is growing interest today in: what constitutes knowledge of the past, the ontology of past events, the relationship of language to the past, and the nature of representations of the past. These interests are distinct from – although connected with – contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, metaphysics, philosophy of language, and aesthetics. Hence we need a distinct venue in which philosophers can explore these issues. Journal of the Philosophy of History provides such a venue. Ever since neo-Kantianism, philosophy of history has been central to all of philosophy, whether or not particular philosophers recognized its potential significance.