利用机器学习优化最小混溶压力预测:综合评估与验证

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Oluwakemi Olofinnika*, Anand Selveindran, Depesh Patel and Esuru Rita Okoroafor, 
{"title":"利用机器学习优化最小混溶压力预测:综合评估与验证","authors":"Oluwakemi Olofinnika*,&nbsp;Anand Selveindran,&nbsp;Depesh Patel and Esuru Rita Okoroafor,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c05201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study provides the proof-of-concept for identifying the most suitable machine-learning (ML) model that predicts minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) based on temperature, crude oil, and injected fluid composition. MMP defined as the lowest pressure injected gas developing miscibility with reservoir oil is crucial for gas-enhanced oil recovery. Slimtube experiments considered the most reliable for MMP predictions are time-consuming. Although researchers have considered ML to expedite MMP predictions, validation of the optimal model that integrates the main controlling factors remains outstanding. We tested eight ML models of different complexities to determine the most suitable for predicting MMP. The models were trained and tested using 75 and 25% of 142 publicly available slim-tube experiments and validated using six in-house slim-tube MMP experiments. The injected gas compositions varied and included H<sub>2</sub>S, CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and C<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup>. We assessed model suitability using mean absolute error (MAE). Models with MAEs &lt;7% estimated the MMP. The highest-performing model after testing and validation was the neural network. This work identifies the most suitable machine-learning technique for MMP prediction validated using recent experiments. The optimal model provides an instantaneous MMP chart for gas injections typical to a Permian field. Also, we demonstrate a workflow for recommending optimal injection gas compositions with low MMP and reduced emissions associated with gas EOR. The procedure ultimately reduces the cost of performing the slim-tube experiment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"38 11","pages":"9365–9380"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c05201","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Minimum Miscibility Pressure Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Validation\",\"authors\":\"Oluwakemi Olofinnika*,&nbsp;Anand Selveindran,&nbsp;Depesh Patel and Esuru Rita Okoroafor,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c05201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This study provides the proof-of-concept for identifying the most suitable machine-learning (ML) model that predicts minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) based on temperature, crude oil, and injected fluid composition. MMP defined as the lowest pressure injected gas developing miscibility with reservoir oil is crucial for gas-enhanced oil recovery. Slimtube experiments considered the most reliable for MMP predictions are time-consuming. Although researchers have considered ML to expedite MMP predictions, validation of the optimal model that integrates the main controlling factors remains outstanding. We tested eight ML models of different complexities to determine the most suitable for predicting MMP. The models were trained and tested using 75 and 25% of 142 publicly available slim-tube experiments and validated using six in-house slim-tube MMP experiments. The injected gas compositions varied and included H<sub>2</sub>S, CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and C<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup>. We assessed model suitability using mean absolute error (MAE). Models with MAEs &lt;7% estimated the MMP. The highest-performing model after testing and validation was the neural network. This work identifies the most suitable machine-learning technique for MMP prediction validated using recent experiments. The optimal model provides an instantaneous MMP chart for gas injections typical to a Permian field. Also, we demonstrate a workflow for recommending optimal injection gas compositions with low MMP and reduced emissions associated with gas EOR. The procedure ultimately reduces the cost of performing the slim-tube experiment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\"38 11\",\"pages\":\"9365–9380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c05201\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c05201\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c05201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究为确定最合适的机器学习(ML)模型提供了概念验证,该模型可根据温度、原油和注入流体成分预测最小混溶压力(MMP)。MMP 定义为注入气体与储层石油形成混溶的最低压力,对于气体提高石油采收率至关重要。被认为是最可靠的 MMP 预测方法的 Slimtube 实验非常耗时。尽管研究人员已经考虑用 ML 来加快 MMP 预测,但整合主要控制因素的最佳模型的验证工作仍未完成。我们测试了八个不同复杂程度的 ML 模型,以确定最适合预测 MMP 的模型。我们使用 142 个公开的细管实验中的 75% 和 25% 对模型进行了训练和测试,并使用六个内部细管 MMP 实验对模型进行了验证。注入的气体成分各不相同,包括 H2S、CO2、N2、CH4 和 C2+。我们使用平均绝对误差 (MAE) 来评估模型的适用性。平均绝对误差为 7% 的模型估算出了 MMP。经过测试和验证,性能最高的模型是神经网络。这项工作利用最近的实验验证了最适合 MMP 预测的机器学习技术。最佳模型为二叠纪典型气田的天然气注入提供了瞬时 MMP 图。此外,我们还演示了一个工作流程,用于推荐具有低 MMP 的最佳注入气体成分,并减少与气体 EOR 相关的排放。该流程最终降低了进行细管实验的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimizing Minimum Miscibility Pressure Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Validation

Optimizing Minimum Miscibility Pressure Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Validation

Optimizing Minimum Miscibility Pressure Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Validation

This study provides the proof-of-concept for identifying the most suitable machine-learning (ML) model that predicts minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) based on temperature, crude oil, and injected fluid composition. MMP defined as the lowest pressure injected gas developing miscibility with reservoir oil is crucial for gas-enhanced oil recovery. Slimtube experiments considered the most reliable for MMP predictions are time-consuming. Although researchers have considered ML to expedite MMP predictions, validation of the optimal model that integrates the main controlling factors remains outstanding. We tested eight ML models of different complexities to determine the most suitable for predicting MMP. The models were trained and tested using 75 and 25% of 142 publicly available slim-tube experiments and validated using six in-house slim-tube MMP experiments. The injected gas compositions varied and included H2S, CO2, N2, CH4, and C2+. We assessed model suitability using mean absolute error (MAE). Models with MAEs <7% estimated the MMP. The highest-performing model after testing and validation was the neural network. This work identifies the most suitable machine-learning technique for MMP prediction validated using recent experiments. The optimal model provides an instantaneous MMP chart for gas injections typical to a Permian field. Also, we demonstrate a workflow for recommending optimal injection gas compositions with low MMP and reduced emissions associated with gas EOR. The procedure ultimately reduces the cost of performing the slim-tube experiment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信