利用网络社区焦点小组研究锁定城市中当地公共卫生的优先事项:思考与建议

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Iain R. Williamson , Benjamin Lond , Andrew Clifton , Tania Hart , Bertha Ochieng
{"title":"利用网络社区焦点小组研究锁定城市中当地公共卫生的优先事项:思考与建议","authors":"Iain R. Williamson ,&nbsp;Benjamin Lond ,&nbsp;Andrew Clifton ,&nbsp;Tania Hart ,&nbsp;Bertha Ochieng","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this commentary paper we reflect on our experiences of conducting two qualitative public health projects in Leicester UK around health inequalities and marginalised groups during the Covid 19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. To contextualise the commentary, we first provide information about Leicester and how and why it was disproportionately affected by the pandemic, as well as describing the origins, aims, and methodologies of the two projects. In the second half, we describe and evaluate some of the adaptations we made to our studies and conclude with suggestions for future qualitative community health research as we adapt to the post-pandemic research landscape.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100443"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000520/pdfft?md5=169b6463be232307e56dc89e72e351f9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667321524000520-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Researching local public health priorities in the locked down city using online community focus groups: Reflections and recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Iain R. Williamson ,&nbsp;Benjamin Lond ,&nbsp;Andrew Clifton ,&nbsp;Tania Hart ,&nbsp;Bertha Ochieng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this commentary paper we reflect on our experiences of conducting two qualitative public health projects in Leicester UK around health inequalities and marginalised groups during the Covid 19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. To contextualise the commentary, we first provide information about Leicester and how and why it was disproportionately affected by the pandemic, as well as describing the origins, aims, and methodologies of the two projects. In the second half, we describe and evaluate some of the adaptations we made to our studies and conclude with suggestions for future qualitative community health research as we adapt to the post-pandemic research landscape.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000520/pdfft?md5=169b6463be232307e56dc89e72e351f9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667321524000520-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇评论文章中,我们回顾了 2020 年和 2021 年 Covid 19 大流行期间,我们在英国莱斯特围绕健康不平等和边缘化群体开展两个定性公共卫生项目的经验。为了说明评论的背景,我们首先提供了有关莱斯特的信息,以及莱斯特如何以及为何受到大流行病的严重影响,并介绍了这两个项目的起源、目标和方法。在后半部分,我们描述并评估了我们在研究中做出的一些调整,并在最后对未来的定性社区健康研究提出了建议,以适应大流行后的研究环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Researching local public health priorities in the locked down city using online community focus groups: Reflections and recommendations

In this commentary paper we reflect on our experiences of conducting two qualitative public health projects in Leicester UK around health inequalities and marginalised groups during the Covid 19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. To contextualise the commentary, we first provide information about Leicester and how and why it was disproportionately affected by the pandemic, as well as describing the origins, aims, and methodologies of the two projects. In the second half, we describe and evaluate some of the adaptations we made to our studies and conclude with suggestions for future qualitative community health research as we adapt to the post-pandemic research landscape.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信