复杂冠状动脉病变 PCI 中超声引导与荧光镜引导的大口径股动脉通路:国际多中心随机 ULTRACOLOR 试验。

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tom A Meijers, Alexander Nap, Adel Aminian, Thomas Schmitz, Joseph Dens, Koen Teeuwen, Jan-Peter van Kuijk, Marleen van Wely, Yoann Bataille, Adriaan O Kraaijeveld, Vincent Roolvink, Jan-Henk E Dambrink, A T Marcel Gosselink, Renicus S Hermanides, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Ioannis Tsilingiris, Deborah M F van den Buijs, Niels van Royen, Maarten A H van Leeuwen
{"title":"复杂冠状动脉病变 PCI 中超声引导与荧光镜引导的大口径股动脉通路:国际多中心随机 ULTRACOLOR 试验。","authors":"Tom A Meijers, Alexander Nap, Adel Aminian, Thomas Schmitz, Joseph Dens, Koen Teeuwen, Jan-Peter van Kuijk, Marleen van Wely, Yoann Bataille, Adriaan O Kraaijeveld, Vincent Roolvink, Jan-Henk E Dambrink, A T Marcel Gosselink, Renicus S Hermanides, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Ioannis Tsilingiris, Deborah M F van den Buijs, Niels van Royen, Maarten A H van Leeuwen","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transfemoral access is often used when large-bore guide catheters are required for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex coronary lesions, especially when large-bore transradial access is contraindicated. Whether the risk of access site complications for these procedures may be reduced by ultrasound-guided puncture is unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to show the superiority of ultrasound-guided femoral puncture compared to fluoroscopy-guided access in large-bore complex PCI with regard to access site-related Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3 or 5 bleeding and/or vascular complications requiring intervention during hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ULTRACOLOR Trial is an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating whether ultrasound-guided large-bore femoral access reduces clinically relevant access site complications compared to fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 544 patients undergoing complex PCI mandating large-bore (≥7 Fr) transfemoral access were randomised at 10 European centres (median age 71; 76% male). Of these patients, 68% required PCI of a chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was met in 18.9% of PCI with fluoroscopy-guided access and 15.7% of PCI with ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32). First-pass puncture success was 92% for ultrasound-guided access versus 85% for fluoroscopy-guided access (p=0.02). The median time in the catheterisation laboratory was 102 minutes versus 105 minutes (p=0.43), and the major adverse cardiovascular event rate at 1 month was 4.1% for fluoroscopy-guided access and 2.6% for ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As compared to fluoroscopy-guided access, the routine use of ultrasound-guided access for large-bore transfemoral complex PCI did not significantly reduce clinically relevant bleeding or vascular access site complications. A significantly higher first-pass puncture success rate was demonstrated for ultrasound-guided access.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov identifier: NCT04837404.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":" ","pages":"e876-e886"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions: the international, multicentre, randomised ULTRACOLOR Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tom A Meijers, Alexander Nap, Adel Aminian, Thomas Schmitz, Joseph Dens, Koen Teeuwen, Jan-Peter van Kuijk, Marleen van Wely, Yoann Bataille, Adriaan O Kraaijeveld, Vincent Roolvink, Jan-Henk E Dambrink, A T Marcel Gosselink, Renicus S Hermanides, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Ioannis Tsilingiris, Deborah M F van den Buijs, Niels van Royen, Maarten A H van Leeuwen\",\"doi\":\"10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transfemoral access is often used when large-bore guide catheters are required for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex coronary lesions, especially when large-bore transradial access is contraindicated. Whether the risk of access site complications for these procedures may be reduced by ultrasound-guided puncture is unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to show the superiority of ultrasound-guided femoral puncture compared to fluoroscopy-guided access in large-bore complex PCI with regard to access site-related Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3 or 5 bleeding and/or vascular complications requiring intervention during hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ULTRACOLOR Trial is an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating whether ultrasound-guided large-bore femoral access reduces clinically relevant access site complications compared to fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 544 patients undergoing complex PCI mandating large-bore (≥7 Fr) transfemoral access were randomised at 10 European centres (median age 71; 76% male). Of these patients, 68% required PCI of a chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was met in 18.9% of PCI with fluoroscopy-guided access and 15.7% of PCI with ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32). First-pass puncture success was 92% for ultrasound-guided access versus 85% for fluoroscopy-guided access (p=0.02). The median time in the catheterisation laboratory was 102 minutes versus 105 minutes (p=0.43), and the major adverse cardiovascular event rate at 1 month was 4.1% for fluoroscopy-guided access and 2.6% for ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As compared to fluoroscopy-guided access, the routine use of ultrasound-guided access for large-bore transfemoral complex PCI did not significantly reduce clinically relevant bleeding or vascular access site complications. A significantly higher first-pass puncture success rate was demonstrated for ultrasound-guided access.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov identifier: NCT04837404.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurointervention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e876-e886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228538/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurointervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00089\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当复杂冠状动脉病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)需要使用大口径导引导管时,尤其是当大口径经桡动脉入路被禁用时,通常会使用经股动脉入路。目的:我们旨在证明在大口径复杂冠状动脉介入治疗中,超声引导股骨穿刺与荧光引导介入相比,在介入部位相关的出血学术研究联盟 2、3 或 5 级出血和/或住院期间需要介入治疗的血管并发症方面的优越性:ULTRACOLOR试验是一项国际多中心随机对照试验,研究在复杂冠状动脉病变PCI中,超声引导大口径股动脉入路与透视引导大口径股动脉入路相比,是否能减少临床相关的入路部位并发症:10个欧洲中心共随机抽取了544名接受复杂冠状动脉PCI手术、必须使用大口径(≥7 Fr)经股动脉入路的患者(中位年龄71岁;76%为男性)。其中68%的患者需要对慢性全闭塞进行PCI治疗。18.9%的患者在透视引导下进行了PCI,15.7%的患者在超声引导下进行了PCI(P=0.32)。超声引导入路的首次穿刺成功率为92%,而透视引导入路为85%(P=0.02)。导管室的中位时间为102分钟对105分钟(P=0.43),1个月后的主要心血管不良事件发生率为:透视引导入路4.1%,超声引导入路2.6%(P=0.32):结论:与透视引导入路相比,常规使用超声引导入路进行大口径经股动脉复杂PCI手术并不能显著减少临床相关出血或血管入路部位并发症。超声引导入路的首次穿刺成功率明显更高:NCT04837404。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions: the international, multicentre, randomised ULTRACOLOR Trial.

Background: Transfemoral access is often used when large-bore guide catheters are required for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex coronary lesions, especially when large-bore transradial access is contraindicated. Whether the risk of access site complications for these procedures may be reduced by ultrasound-guided puncture is unclear.

Aims: We aimed to show the superiority of ultrasound-guided femoral puncture compared to fluoroscopy-guided access in large-bore complex PCI with regard to access site-related Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3 or 5 bleeding and/or vascular complications requiring intervention during hospitalisation.

Methods: The ULTRACOLOR Trial is an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating whether ultrasound-guided large-bore femoral access reduces clinically relevant access site complications compared to fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions.

Results: A total of 544 patients undergoing complex PCI mandating large-bore (≥7 Fr) transfemoral access were randomised at 10 European centres (median age 71; 76% male). Of these patients, 68% required PCI of a chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was met in 18.9% of PCI with fluoroscopy-guided access and 15.7% of PCI with ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32). First-pass puncture success was 92% for ultrasound-guided access versus 85% for fluoroscopy-guided access (p=0.02). The median time in the catheterisation laboratory was 102 minutes versus 105 minutes (p=0.43), and the major adverse cardiovascular event rate at 1 month was 4.1% for fluoroscopy-guided access and 2.6% for ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32).

Conclusions: As compared to fluoroscopy-guided access, the routine use of ultrasound-guided access for large-bore transfemoral complex PCI did not significantly reduce clinically relevant bleeding or vascular access site complications. A significantly higher first-pass puncture success rate was demonstrated for ultrasound-guided access.

Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT04837404.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信