野生食草动物和牛对非洲热带草原火后草本植被恢复的影响不同。

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Sherril P. Masudi, Wilfred O. Odadi, Duncan M. Kimuyu, Charles K. Gachuiri, Ryan L. Sensenig, Truman P. Young
{"title":"野生食草动物和牛对非洲热带草原火后草本植被恢复的影响不同。","authors":"Sherril P. Masudi,&nbsp;Wilfred O. Odadi,&nbsp;Duncan M. Kimuyu,&nbsp;Charles K. Gachuiri,&nbsp;Ryan L. Sensenig,&nbsp;Truman P. Young","doi":"10.1002/eap.2975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fire and herbivory have profound effects on vegetation in savanna ecosystems, but little is known about how different herbivore groups influence vegetation dynamics after fire. We assessed the separate and combined effects of herbivory by cattle and wild meso- and megaherbivores on postfire herbaceous vegetation cover, species richness, and species turnover in a savanna ecosystem in central Kenya. We measured these vegetation attributes for five sampling periods (from 2013 to 2017) in prescribed burns and unburned areas located within a series of replicated long-term herbivore exclosures that allow six different combinations of cattle and wild meso- and megaherbivores (elephants and giraffes). Vegetation cover (grasses, mainly) and species richness were initially reduced by burning but recovered by 15–27 months after fire, suggesting strong resilience to infrequent fire. However, the rates of recovery differed in plots accessible by different wild and domestic herbivore guilds. Wildlife (but not cattle) delayed postfire recovery of grasses, and the absence of wildlife (with or without cattle) delayed recovery of forbs. Herbivory by only cattle increased grass species richness in burned relative to unburned areas. Herbivory by cattle (with or without wildlife), however, reduced forb species richness in burned relative to unburned areas. Herbivory by wild ungulates (but not cattle) increased herbaceous species turnover in burned relative to unburned areas. Megaherbivores had negligible modifying effects on these results. This study demonstrates that savanna ecosystems are remarkably resilient to infrequent fires, but postfire grazing by cattle and wild mesoherbivores exerts different effects on recovery trajectories of herbaceous vegetation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.2975","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wild herbivores and cattle have differing effects on postfire herbaceous vegetation recovery in an African savanna\",\"authors\":\"Sherril P. Masudi,&nbsp;Wilfred O. Odadi,&nbsp;Duncan M. Kimuyu,&nbsp;Charles K. Gachuiri,&nbsp;Ryan L. Sensenig,&nbsp;Truman P. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eap.2975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Fire and herbivory have profound effects on vegetation in savanna ecosystems, but little is known about how different herbivore groups influence vegetation dynamics after fire. We assessed the separate and combined effects of herbivory by cattle and wild meso- and megaherbivores on postfire herbaceous vegetation cover, species richness, and species turnover in a savanna ecosystem in central Kenya. We measured these vegetation attributes for five sampling periods (from 2013 to 2017) in prescribed burns and unburned areas located within a series of replicated long-term herbivore exclosures that allow six different combinations of cattle and wild meso- and megaherbivores (elephants and giraffes). Vegetation cover (grasses, mainly) and species richness were initially reduced by burning but recovered by 15–27 months after fire, suggesting strong resilience to infrequent fire. However, the rates of recovery differed in plots accessible by different wild and domestic herbivore guilds. Wildlife (but not cattle) delayed postfire recovery of grasses, and the absence of wildlife (with or without cattle) delayed recovery of forbs. Herbivory by only cattle increased grass species richness in burned relative to unburned areas. Herbivory by cattle (with or without wildlife), however, reduced forb species richness in burned relative to unburned areas. Herbivory by wild ungulates (but not cattle) increased herbaceous species turnover in burned relative to unburned areas. Megaherbivores had negligible modifying effects on these results. This study demonstrates that savanna ecosystems are remarkably resilient to infrequent fires, but postfire grazing by cattle and wild mesoherbivores exerts different effects on recovery trajectories of herbaceous vegetation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.2975\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

火灾和食草动物对热带稀树草原生态系统的植被有着深远的影响,但人们对不同食草动物群如何影响火灾后的植被动态知之甚少。我们评估了在肯尼亚中部的一个热带稀树草原生态系统中,牛和野生中型和大型食草动物的食草行为对火后草本植被覆盖度、物种丰富度和物种更替的单独和综合影响。我们在五个采样期(2013 年至 2017 年)对位于一系列重复的长期食草动物围栏内的规定燃烧区和未燃烧区的这些植被属性进行了测量,这些围栏允许六种不同组合的牛和野生中型和大型食草动物(大象和长颈鹿)栖息。焚烧导致植被覆盖度(主要是草)和物种丰富度降低,但在焚烧后 15-27 个月内恢复,这表明植被对不频繁的焚烧具有很强的恢复能力。然而,在不同的野生和家养食草动物群体所能进入的地块中,恢复速度有所不同。野生动物(而不是牛)会延迟禾本科植物的火后恢复,而没有野生动物(无论是否有牛)会延迟牧草的恢复。与未烧毁地区相比,只有牛的食草行为增加了烧毁地区草类物种的丰富度。然而,与未烧毁地区相比,牛(无论是否有野生动物)的食草行为降低了烧毁地区的草本植物物种丰富度。野生有蹄类动物(而非牛)的食草行为增加了焚烧区草本植物物种的更替。大型食草动物对这些结果的影响可以忽略不计。这项研究表明,热带稀树草原生态系统对不频繁发生的火灾具有显著的恢复能力,但牛和野生中食草动物在火灾后的放牧对草本植被的恢复轨迹产生了不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Wild herbivores and cattle have differing effects on postfire herbaceous vegetation recovery in an African savanna

Wild herbivores and cattle have differing effects on postfire herbaceous vegetation recovery in an African savanna

Fire and herbivory have profound effects on vegetation in savanna ecosystems, but little is known about how different herbivore groups influence vegetation dynamics after fire. We assessed the separate and combined effects of herbivory by cattle and wild meso- and megaherbivores on postfire herbaceous vegetation cover, species richness, and species turnover in a savanna ecosystem in central Kenya. We measured these vegetation attributes for five sampling periods (from 2013 to 2017) in prescribed burns and unburned areas located within a series of replicated long-term herbivore exclosures that allow six different combinations of cattle and wild meso- and megaherbivores (elephants and giraffes). Vegetation cover (grasses, mainly) and species richness were initially reduced by burning but recovered by 15–27 months after fire, suggesting strong resilience to infrequent fire. However, the rates of recovery differed in plots accessible by different wild and domestic herbivore guilds. Wildlife (but not cattle) delayed postfire recovery of grasses, and the absence of wildlife (with or without cattle) delayed recovery of forbs. Herbivory by only cattle increased grass species richness in burned relative to unburned areas. Herbivory by cattle (with or without wildlife), however, reduced forb species richness in burned relative to unburned areas. Herbivory by wild ungulates (but not cattle) increased herbaceous species turnover in burned relative to unburned areas. Megaherbivores had negligible modifying effects on these results. This study demonstrates that savanna ecosystems are remarkably resilient to infrequent fires, but postfire grazing by cattle and wild mesoherbivores exerts different effects on recovery trajectories of herbaceous vegetation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信