Suprabhat Giri, Sidharth Harindranath, Babu P Mohan, Vaneet Jearth, Jijo Varghese, Marko Kozyk, Aditya Kale, Sridhar Sundaram
{"title":"内镜超声引导下胃肠造口术治疗胃出口梗阻的不良事件--系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Suprabhat Giri, Sidharth Harindranath, Babu P Mohan, Vaneet Jearth, Jijo Varghese, Marko Kozyk, Aditya Kale, Sridhar Sundaram","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.12576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The technical and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been reported by several meta-analyses, but few of them have addressed the adverse events (AE). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the AEs associated with various types of EUS-GE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All relevant studies reporting the AEs with EUS-GE were searched from 2000 to 31st March 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. The event rates were pooled using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 studies (n = 1846) were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis reports a pooled technical success rate of 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I<sup>2</sup> = 29.3%) with a pooled clinical success rate of 90.6% (88.5-92.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 60.9%). The pooled incidence of overall AEs with EUS-GE was 13.0% (10.3-15.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 69.7%), with the commonest being maldeployment of the stent, seen in 4.6% (3.2-6.0; I<sup>2</sup> = 50.6%). The pooled incidences of serious AE and procedure-related mortality were 1.2% (0.7-1.8; I<sup>2</sup> = 1.9%) and 0.3% (0.0-0.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), respectively. Subgroup analysis of studies using only the free-hand technique showed a significantly lower overall AE and maldeployment but not serious AE and other individual AEs. The pooled incidences of delayed stent migration and stent occlusion were 0.5% (0.0-1.1; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and 0.8% (0.2-1.3; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a technical and clinical success rate of >90%, AEs are seen in around one-seventh of the cases of EUS-GE, maldeployment being the commonest. However, the pooled incidence of serious AE and mortality remains low, which is reassuring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"879-890"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Suprabhat Giri, Sidharth Harindranath, Babu P Mohan, Vaneet Jearth, Jijo Varghese, Marko Kozyk, Aditya Kale, Sridhar Sundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ueg2.12576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The technical and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been reported by several meta-analyses, but few of them have addressed the adverse events (AE). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the AEs associated with various types of EUS-GE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All relevant studies reporting the AEs with EUS-GE were searched from 2000 to 31st March 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. The event rates were pooled using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 studies (n = 1846) were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis reports a pooled technical success rate of 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I<sup>2</sup> = 29.3%) with a pooled clinical success rate of 90.6% (88.5-92.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 60.9%). The pooled incidence of overall AEs with EUS-GE was 13.0% (10.3-15.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 69.7%), with the commonest being maldeployment of the stent, seen in 4.6% (3.2-6.0; I<sup>2</sup> = 50.6%). The pooled incidences of serious AE and procedure-related mortality were 1.2% (0.7-1.8; I<sup>2</sup> = 1.9%) and 0.3% (0.0-0.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), respectively. Subgroup analysis of studies using only the free-hand technique showed a significantly lower overall AE and maldeployment but not serious AE and other individual AEs. The pooled incidences of delayed stent migration and stent occlusion were 0.5% (0.0-1.1; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and 0.8% (0.2-1.3; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a technical and clinical success rate of >90%, AEs are seen in around one-seventh of the cases of EUS-GE, maldeployment being the commonest. However, the pooled incidence of serious AE and mortality remains low, which is reassuring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"879-890\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12576\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adverse events with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: The technical and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been reported by several meta-analyses, but few of them have addressed the adverse events (AE). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the AEs associated with various types of EUS-GE.
Methods: All relevant studies reporting the AEs with EUS-GE were searched from 2000 to 31st March 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. The event rates were pooled using a random effects model.
Results: A total of 36 studies (n = 1846) were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis reports a pooled technical success rate of 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I2 = 29.3%) with a pooled clinical success rate of 90.6% (88.5-92.7; I2 = 60.9%). The pooled incidence of overall AEs with EUS-GE was 13.0% (10.3-15.7; I2 = 69.7%), with the commonest being maldeployment of the stent, seen in 4.6% (3.2-6.0; I2 = 50.6%). The pooled incidences of serious AE and procedure-related mortality were 1.2% (0.7-1.8; I2 = 1.9%) and 0.3% (0.0-0.7; I2 = 0.0%), respectively. Subgroup analysis of studies using only the free-hand technique showed a significantly lower overall AE and maldeployment but not serious AE and other individual AEs. The pooled incidences of delayed stent migration and stent occlusion were 0.5% (0.0-1.1; I2 = 0.0%) and 0.8% (0.2-1.3; I2 = 0.0%), respectively.
Conclusion: Despite a technical and clinical success rate of >90%, AEs are seen in around one-seventh of the cases of EUS-GE, maldeployment being the commonest. However, the pooled incidence of serious AE and mortality remains low, which is reassuring.
期刊介绍:
United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.