测量迷幻体验中的心理治疗过程:一般变化机制问卷(GCMQ)的验证。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1177/02698811241249698
Max Wolff, Ricarda Evens, Lea J Mertens, Christopher Schmidt, Jessica Beck, Hans Rutrecht, Aaron D Cherniak, Gerhard Gründer, Henrik Jungaberle
{"title":"测量迷幻体验中的心理治疗过程:一般变化机制问卷(GCMQ)的验证。","authors":"Max Wolff, Ricarda Evens, Lea J Mertens, Christopher Schmidt, Jessica Beck, Hans Rutrecht, Aaron D Cherniak, Gerhard Gründer, Henrik Jungaberle","doi":"10.1177/02698811241249698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic and salutogenic effects of psychedelic drugs have been attributed to psychotherapeutic or psychotherapy-like processes that can unfold during the acute psychedelic experience and beyond. Currently, there are no psychometric instruments available to comprehensively assess psychotherapeutic processes (as conceptualized by empirical psychotherapy research) in the context of psychedelic experiences.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We report the initial validation of the General Change Mechanisms Questionnaire (GCMQ), a self-report instrument designed to measure five empirically established general change mechanisms (GCMs) of psychotherapy-(1) resource activation, (2) therapeutic relationship, (3) problem actuation, (4) clarification, and (5) mastery-in the context of psychedelic experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey in a sample of 1153 English-speaking and 714 German-speaking psychedelic users was conducted to evaluate simultaneously developed English- and German-language versions of the GCMQ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The theory-based factor structure was confirmed. The five GCMQ scales showed good internal consistency. Evidence for convergent validity with external measures was obtained. Significant associations with different settings and with therapeutic, hedonic, and escapist use motives confirmed the hypothesized context dependence of GCM-related psychedelic experiences. Indicating potential therapeutic effects, the association between cumulative stressful life events and well-being was significantly moderated by resource activation, clarification, and mastery. Factor mixture modeling revealed five distinct profiles of GCM-related psychedelic experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial testing indicates that the GCMQ is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in future clinical and nonclinical psychedelic research. The five identified profiles of GCM-related experiences may be relevant to clinical uses of psychedelics and psychedelic harm reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"432-457"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring psychotherapeutic processes in the context of psychedelic experiences: Validation of the General Change Mechanisms Questionnaire (GCMQ).\",\"authors\":\"Max Wolff, Ricarda Evens, Lea J Mertens, Christopher Schmidt, Jessica Beck, Hans Rutrecht, Aaron D Cherniak, Gerhard Gründer, Henrik Jungaberle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02698811241249698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic and salutogenic effects of psychedelic drugs have been attributed to psychotherapeutic or psychotherapy-like processes that can unfold during the acute psychedelic experience and beyond. Currently, there are no psychometric instruments available to comprehensively assess psychotherapeutic processes (as conceptualized by empirical psychotherapy research) in the context of psychedelic experiences.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We report the initial validation of the General Change Mechanisms Questionnaire (GCMQ), a self-report instrument designed to measure five empirically established general change mechanisms (GCMs) of psychotherapy-(1) resource activation, (2) therapeutic relationship, (3) problem actuation, (4) clarification, and (5) mastery-in the context of psychedelic experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey in a sample of 1153 English-speaking and 714 German-speaking psychedelic users was conducted to evaluate simultaneously developed English- and German-language versions of the GCMQ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The theory-based factor structure was confirmed. The five GCMQ scales showed good internal consistency. Evidence for convergent validity with external measures was obtained. Significant associations with different settings and with therapeutic, hedonic, and escapist use motives confirmed the hypothesized context dependence of GCM-related psychedelic experiences. Indicating potential therapeutic effects, the association between cumulative stressful life events and well-being was significantly moderated by resource activation, clarification, and mastery. Factor mixture modeling revealed five distinct profiles of GCM-related psychedelic experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial testing indicates that the GCMQ is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in future clinical and nonclinical psychedelic research. The five identified profiles of GCM-related experiences may be relevant to clinical uses of psychedelics and psychedelic harm reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"432-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102652/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241249698\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241249698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:迷幻药的治疗和致救作用归因于心理治疗或类似心理治疗的过程,这些过程可以在急性迷幻体验期间和之后展开。目前,还没有心理测量工具可以全面评估迷幻体验中的心理治疗过程(如经验心理治疗研究的概念)。目的:我们报告了 "一般改变机制问卷"(GCMQ)的初步验证结果,这是一种自我报告工具,旨在测量迷幻体验背景下心理治疗的五种经验确立的一般改变机制--(1)资源激活、(2)治疗关系、(3)问题激活、(4)澄清和(5)掌握:方法:对 1153 名英语迷幻药使用者和 714 名德语迷幻药使用者进行了在线调查,以评估同时开发的英语版和德语版 GCMQ:结果:基于理论的因子结构得到了证实。GCMQ 的五个量表显示出良好的内部一致性。结果:基于理论的因子结构得到了证实,五个 GCMQ 量表显示出良好的内部一致性,并获得了与外部测量的收敛效度证据。与不同环境以及治疗性、享乐性和逃避性使用动机之间的显著关联证实了 GCM 相关迷幻体验的假设情境依赖性。累积性生活压力事件与幸福感之间的关系受到资源激活、澄清和掌握的显著调节,这表明了潜在的治疗效果。因子混合模型揭示了与 GCM 相关的迷幻体验的五种不同特征:初步测试表明,GCMQ 是一种有效、可靠的工具,可用于未来的临床和非临床迷幻研究。GCM 相关体验的五个特征可能与迷幻药的临床使用和减少迷幻药伤害有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring psychotherapeutic processes in the context of psychedelic experiences: Validation of the General Change Mechanisms Questionnaire (GCMQ).

Background: Therapeutic and salutogenic effects of psychedelic drugs have been attributed to psychotherapeutic or psychotherapy-like processes that can unfold during the acute psychedelic experience and beyond. Currently, there are no psychometric instruments available to comprehensively assess psychotherapeutic processes (as conceptualized by empirical psychotherapy research) in the context of psychedelic experiences.

Aims: We report the initial validation of the General Change Mechanisms Questionnaire (GCMQ), a self-report instrument designed to measure five empirically established general change mechanisms (GCMs) of psychotherapy-(1) resource activation, (2) therapeutic relationship, (3) problem actuation, (4) clarification, and (5) mastery-in the context of psychedelic experiences.

Methods: An online survey in a sample of 1153 English-speaking and 714 German-speaking psychedelic users was conducted to evaluate simultaneously developed English- and German-language versions of the GCMQ.

Results: The theory-based factor structure was confirmed. The five GCMQ scales showed good internal consistency. Evidence for convergent validity with external measures was obtained. Significant associations with different settings and with therapeutic, hedonic, and escapist use motives confirmed the hypothesized context dependence of GCM-related psychedelic experiences. Indicating potential therapeutic effects, the association between cumulative stressful life events and well-being was significantly moderated by resource activation, clarification, and mastery. Factor mixture modeling revealed five distinct profiles of GCM-related psychedelic experiences.

Conclusion: Initial testing indicates that the GCMQ is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in future clinical and nonclinical psychedelic research. The five identified profiles of GCM-related experiences may be relevant to clinical uses of psychedelics and psychedelic harm reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信