人工智能增强了对三阴性乳腺癌 PD-L1 CPS 的全片解读:一项多机构环形研究。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Histopathology Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/his.15205
Jinze Li, Pei Dong, Xinran Wang, Jun Zhang, Meng Zhao, Haocheng Shen, Lijing Cai, Jiankun He, Mengxue Han, Jiaxian Miao, Hongbo Liu, Wei Yang, Xiao Han, Yueping Liu
{"title":"人工智能增强了对三阴性乳腺癌 PD-L1 CPS 的全片解读:一项多机构环形研究。","authors":"Jinze Li,&nbsp;Pei Dong,&nbsp;Xinran Wang,&nbsp;Jun Zhang,&nbsp;Meng Zhao,&nbsp;Haocheng Shen,&nbsp;Lijing Cai,&nbsp;Jiankun He,&nbsp;Mengxue Han,&nbsp;Jiaxian Miao,&nbsp;Hongbo Liu,&nbsp;Wei Yang,&nbsp;Xiao Han,&nbsp;Yueping Liu","doi":"10.1111/his.15205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and aims</h3>\n \n <p>Evaluation of the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) is vital to predict the efficacy of the immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but pathologists show substantial variability in the consistency and accuracy of the interpretation. It is of great importance to establish an objective and effective method which is highly repeatable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We proposed a model in a deep learning-based framework, which at the patch level incorporated cell analysis and tissue region analysis, followed by the whole-slide level fusion of patch results. Three rounds of ring studies (RSs) were conducted. Twenty-one pathologists of different levels from four institutions evaluated the PD-L1 CPS in TNBC specimens as continuous scores by visual assessment and our artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the visual assessment, the interpretation results of PD-L1 (Dako 22C3) CPS by different levels of pathologists have significant differences and showed weak consistency. Using AI-assisted interpretation, there were no significant differences between all pathologists (<i>P</i> = 0.43), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value was increased from 0.618 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.524–0.719] to 0.931 (95% CI = 0.902–0.955). The accuracy of interpretation result is further improved to 0.919 (95% CI = 0.886–0.947). Acceptance of AI results by junior pathologists was the highest among all levels, and 80% of the AI results were accepted overall.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>With the help of the AI-assisted diagnostic method, different levels of pathologists achieved excellent consistency and repeatability in the interpretation of PD-L1 (Dako 22C3) CPS. Our AI-assisted diagnostic approach was proved to strengthen the consistency and repeatability in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence enhances whole-slide interpretation of PD-L1 CPS in triple-negative breast cancer: A multi-institutional ring study\",\"authors\":\"Jinze Li,&nbsp;Pei Dong,&nbsp;Xinran Wang,&nbsp;Jun Zhang,&nbsp;Meng Zhao,&nbsp;Haocheng Shen,&nbsp;Lijing Cai,&nbsp;Jiankun He,&nbsp;Mengxue Han,&nbsp;Jiaxian Miao,&nbsp;Hongbo Liu,&nbsp;Wei Yang,&nbsp;Xiao Han,&nbsp;Yueping Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/his.15205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Evaluation of the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) is vital to predict the efficacy of the immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but pathologists show substantial variability in the consistency and accuracy of the interpretation. It is of great importance to establish an objective and effective method which is highly repeatable.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We proposed a model in a deep learning-based framework, which at the patch level incorporated cell analysis and tissue region analysis, followed by the whole-slide level fusion of patch results. Three rounds of ring studies (RSs) were conducted. Twenty-one pathologists of different levels from four institutions evaluated the PD-L1 CPS in TNBC specimens as continuous scores by visual assessment and our artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the visual assessment, the interpretation results of PD-L1 (Dako 22C3) CPS by different levels of pathologists have significant differences and showed weak consistency. Using AI-assisted interpretation, there were no significant differences between all pathologists (<i>P</i> = 0.43), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value was increased from 0.618 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.524–0.719] to 0.931 (95% CI = 0.902–0.955). The accuracy of interpretation result is further improved to 0.919 (95% CI = 0.886–0.947). Acceptance of AI results by junior pathologists was the highest among all levels, and 80% of the AI results were accepted overall.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>With the help of the AI-assisted diagnostic method, different levels of pathologists achieved excellent consistency and repeatability in the interpretation of PD-L1 (Dako 22C3) CPS. Our AI-assisted diagnostic approach was proved to strengthen the consistency and repeatability in clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Histopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Histopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/his.15205\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/his.15205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:程序性细胞死亡配体-1(PD-L1)联合阳性评分(CPS)的评估对于预测三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)免疫疗法的疗效至关重要,但病理学家在解释的一致性和准确性方面存在很大差异。因此,建立一种客观、有效且可重复性高的方法非常重要:我们在基于深度学习的框架中提出了一个模型,该模型在斑块层面结合了细胞分析和组织区域分析,然后在整个切片层面融合斑块结果。我们进行了三轮环形研究(RS)。来自四个机构的21位不同级别的病理学家通过视觉评估和人工智能(AI)辅助方法对TNBC标本中的PD-L1 CPS进行了连续评分:在视觉评估中,不同级别病理学家对PD-L1(Dako 22C3)CPS的解读结果存在显著差异,一致性较弱。采用人工智能辅助判读法后,所有病理学家之间无明显差异(P = 0.43),类内相关系数(ICC)值从 0.618 [95% 置信区间 (CI) = 0.524-0.719] 提高到 0.931 (95% CI = 0.902-0.955) 。解释结果的准确性进一步提高到 0.919 (95% CI = 0.886-0.947)。在所有级别中,初级病理学家对人工智能结果的接受度最高,80%的人工智能结果被总体接受:结论:在人工智能辅助诊断方法的帮助下,不同级别的病理学家在解读PD-L1(Dako 22C3)CPS时实现了极好的一致性和可重复性。事实证明,我们的人工智能辅助诊断方法加强了临床实践中的一致性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial intelligence enhances whole-slide interpretation of PD-L1 CPS in triple-negative breast cancer: A multi-institutional ring study

Artificial intelligence enhances whole-slide interpretation of PD-L1 CPS in triple-negative breast cancer: A multi-institutional ring study

Background and aims

Evaluation of the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) is vital to predict the efficacy of the immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but pathologists show substantial variability in the consistency and accuracy of the interpretation. It is of great importance to establish an objective and effective method which is highly repeatable.

Methods

We proposed a model in a deep learning-based framework, which at the patch level incorporated cell analysis and tissue region analysis, followed by the whole-slide level fusion of patch results. Three rounds of ring studies (RSs) were conducted. Twenty-one pathologists of different levels from four institutions evaluated the PD-L1 CPS in TNBC specimens as continuous scores by visual assessment and our artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted method.

Results

In the visual assessment, the interpretation results of PD-L1 (Dako 22C3) CPS by different levels of pathologists have significant differences and showed weak consistency. Using AI-assisted interpretation, there were no significant differences between all pathologists (P = 0.43), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value was increased from 0.618 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.524–0.719] to 0.931 (95% CI = 0.902–0.955). The accuracy of interpretation result is further improved to 0.919 (95% CI = 0.886–0.947). Acceptance of AI results by junior pathologists was the highest among all levels, and 80% of the AI results were accepted overall.

Conclusion

With the help of the AI-assisted diagnostic method, different levels of pathologists achieved excellent consistency and repeatability in the interpretation of PD-L1 (Dako 22C3) CPS. Our AI-assisted diagnostic approach was proved to strengthen the consistency and repeatability in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Histopathology
Histopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
239
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Histopathology is an international journal intended to be of practical value to surgical and diagnostic histopathologists, and to investigators of human disease who employ histopathological methods. Our primary purpose is to publish advances in pathology, in particular those applicable to clinical practice and contributing to the better understanding of human disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信