用于评估发育期和成年期神经毒性的监管新方法:PARC 第 5 工作包项目。

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2024-04-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2024.1359507
Tamara Tal, Oddvar Myhre, Ellen Fritsche, Joëlle Rüegg, Kai Craenen, Kiara Aiello-Holden, Caroline Agrillo, Patrick J Babin, Beate I Escher, Hubert Dirven, Kati Hellsten, Kristine Dolva, Ellen Hessel, Harm J Heusinkveld, Yavor Hadzhiev, Selma Hurem, Karolina Jagiello, Beata Judzinska, Nils Klüver, Anja Knoll-Gellida, Britta A Kühne, Marcel Leist, Malene Lislien, Jan L Lyche, Ferenc Müller, John K Colbourne, Winfried Neuhaus, Giorgia Pallocca, Bettina Seeger, Ilka Scharkin, Stefan Scholz, Ola Spjuth, Monica Torres-Ruiz, Kristina Bartmann
{"title":"用于评估发育期和成年期神经毒性的监管新方法:PARC 第 5 工作包项目。","authors":"Tamara Tal, Oddvar Myhre, Ellen Fritsche, Joëlle Rüegg, Kai Craenen, Kiara Aiello-Holden, Caroline Agrillo, Patrick J Babin, Beate I Escher, Hubert Dirven, Kati Hellsten, Kristine Dolva, Ellen Hessel, Harm J Heusinkveld, Yavor Hadzhiev, Selma Hurem, Karolina Jagiello, Beata Judzinska, Nils Klüver, Anja Knoll-Gellida, Britta A Kühne, Marcel Leist, Malene Lislien, Jan L Lyche, Ferenc Müller, John K Colbourne, Winfried Neuhaus, Giorgia Pallocca, Bettina Seeger, Ilka Scharkin, Stefan Scholz, Ola Spjuth, Monica Torres-Ruiz, Kristina Bartmann","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2024.1359507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the European regulatory context, rodent <i>in vivo</i> studies are the predominant source of neurotoxicity information. Although they form a cornerstone of neurotoxicological assessments, they are costly and the topic of ethical debate. While the public expects chemicals and products to be safe for the developing and mature nervous systems, considerable numbers of chemicals in commerce have not, or only to a limited extent, been assessed for their potential to cause neurotoxicity. As such, there is a societal push toward the replacement of animal models with <i>in vitro</i> or alternative methods. New approach methods (NAMs) can contribute to the regulatory knowledge base, increase chemical safety, and modernize chemical hazard and risk assessment. Provided they reach an acceptable level of regulatory relevance and reliability, NAMs may be considered as replacements for specific <i>in vivo</i> studies. The European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) addresses challenges to the development and implementation of NAMs in chemical risk assessment. In collaboration with regulatory agencies, Project 5.2.1e (Neurotoxicity) aims to develop and evaluate NAMs for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) and adult neurotoxicity (ANT) and to understand the applicability domain of specific NAMs for the detection of endocrine disruption and epigenetic perturbation. To speed up assay time and reduce costs, we identify early indicators of later-onset effects. Ultimately, we will assemble second-generation developmental neurotoxicity and first-generation adult neurotoxicity test batteries, both of which aim to provide regulatory hazard and risk assessors and industry stakeholders with robust, speedy, lower-cost, and informative next-generation hazard and risk assessment tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1359507"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11089904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New approach methods to assess developmental and adult neurotoxicity for regulatory use: a PARC work package 5 project.\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Tal, Oddvar Myhre, Ellen Fritsche, Joëlle Rüegg, Kai Craenen, Kiara Aiello-Holden, Caroline Agrillo, Patrick J Babin, Beate I Escher, Hubert Dirven, Kati Hellsten, Kristine Dolva, Ellen Hessel, Harm J Heusinkveld, Yavor Hadzhiev, Selma Hurem, Karolina Jagiello, Beata Judzinska, Nils Klüver, Anja Knoll-Gellida, Britta A Kühne, Marcel Leist, Malene Lislien, Jan L Lyche, Ferenc Müller, John K Colbourne, Winfried Neuhaus, Giorgia Pallocca, Bettina Seeger, Ilka Scharkin, Stefan Scholz, Ola Spjuth, Monica Torres-Ruiz, Kristina Bartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ftox.2024.1359507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the European regulatory context, rodent <i>in vivo</i> studies are the predominant source of neurotoxicity information. Although they form a cornerstone of neurotoxicological assessments, they are costly and the topic of ethical debate. While the public expects chemicals and products to be safe for the developing and mature nervous systems, considerable numbers of chemicals in commerce have not, or only to a limited extent, been assessed for their potential to cause neurotoxicity. As such, there is a societal push toward the replacement of animal models with <i>in vitro</i> or alternative methods. New approach methods (NAMs) can contribute to the regulatory knowledge base, increase chemical safety, and modernize chemical hazard and risk assessment. Provided they reach an acceptable level of regulatory relevance and reliability, NAMs may be considered as replacements for specific <i>in vivo</i> studies. The European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) addresses challenges to the development and implementation of NAMs in chemical risk assessment. In collaboration with regulatory agencies, Project 5.2.1e (Neurotoxicity) aims to develop and evaluate NAMs for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) and adult neurotoxicity (ANT) and to understand the applicability domain of specific NAMs for the detection of endocrine disruption and epigenetic perturbation. To speed up assay time and reduce costs, we identify early indicators of later-onset effects. Ultimately, we will assemble second-generation developmental neurotoxicity and first-generation adult neurotoxicity test batteries, both of which aim to provide regulatory hazard and risk assessors and industry stakeholders with robust, speedy, lower-cost, and informative next-generation hazard and risk assessment tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1359507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11089904/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2024.1359507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2024.1359507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲的监管环境中,啮齿动物体内研究是神经毒性信息的主要来源。虽然它们是神经毒理学评估的基石,但成本高昂,而且是伦理辩论的主题。虽然公众期望化学品和产品对发育中和成熟的神经系统是安全的,但相当数量的商业化学品尚未或仅在有限程度上接受过神经毒性潜力评估。因此,社会正在推动用体外或替代方法取代动物模型。新方法(NAMs)可以为监管知识库做出贡献,提高化学品安全性,并使化学品危害和风险评估现代化。如果新方法在监管相关性和可靠性方面达到可接受的水平,则可考虑将其作为特定体内研究的替代方法。欧洲化学品风险评估合作伙伴关系(PARC)致力于解决在化学品风险评估中开发和实施非结构化模拟所面临的挑战。项目 5.2.1e(神经毒性)与监管机构合作,旨在开发和评估针对发育神经毒性(DNT)和成人神经毒性(ANT)的 NAM,并了解特定 NAM 在检测内分泌干扰和表观遗传扰乱方面的适用范围。为了加快检测时间和降低成本,我们确定了后期效应的早期指标。最终,我们将组建第二代发育神经毒性和第一代成人神经毒性测试电池组,旨在为监管机构和风险评估人员以及行业利益相关者提供稳健、快速、低成本和信息丰富的下一代危害和风险评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New approach methods to assess developmental and adult neurotoxicity for regulatory use: a PARC work package 5 project.

In the European regulatory context, rodent in vivo studies are the predominant source of neurotoxicity information. Although they form a cornerstone of neurotoxicological assessments, they are costly and the topic of ethical debate. While the public expects chemicals and products to be safe for the developing and mature nervous systems, considerable numbers of chemicals in commerce have not, or only to a limited extent, been assessed for their potential to cause neurotoxicity. As such, there is a societal push toward the replacement of animal models with in vitro or alternative methods. New approach methods (NAMs) can contribute to the regulatory knowledge base, increase chemical safety, and modernize chemical hazard and risk assessment. Provided they reach an acceptable level of regulatory relevance and reliability, NAMs may be considered as replacements for specific in vivo studies. The European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) addresses challenges to the development and implementation of NAMs in chemical risk assessment. In collaboration with regulatory agencies, Project 5.2.1e (Neurotoxicity) aims to develop and evaluate NAMs for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) and adult neurotoxicity (ANT) and to understand the applicability domain of specific NAMs for the detection of endocrine disruption and epigenetic perturbation. To speed up assay time and reduce costs, we identify early indicators of later-onset effects. Ultimately, we will assemble second-generation developmental neurotoxicity and first-generation adult neurotoxicity test batteries, both of which aim to provide regulatory hazard and risk assessors and industry stakeholders with robust, speedy, lower-cost, and informative next-generation hazard and risk assessment tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信