需要接受抗骨质疏松症治疗的患者在首次接受骨折联络服务之前和之后一年内的社会成本。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Lieke Maas, Annelies Boonen, Caroline E Wyers, Sandrine Bours, Joop P van den Bergh, Silvia M Evers, Sander M J van Kuijk, Mickaël Hiligsmann
{"title":"需要接受抗骨质疏松症治疗的患者在首次接受骨折联络服务之前和之后一年内的社会成本。","authors":"Lieke Maas, Annelies Boonen, Caroline E Wyers, Sandrine Bours, Joop P van den Bergh, Silvia M Evers, Sander M J van Kuijk, Mickaël Hiligsmann","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01390-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to estimate societal and healthcare costs incurred before and 1 year after the first fracture liaison services (FLS) visit and to explore differences in fracture type. All costs after 1 year significantly decreased compared to costs preceding the first visit. Fracture type did not significantly affect costs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited literature is available on resource utilization and costs of patients visiting fracture liaison services (FLS). This study aimed to estimate the societal and healthcare costs incurred by patients with a recent fracture requiring anti-osteoporosis medication before and 1 year after the first FLS visit and to explore differences according to fracture type.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Resource utilization was collected through a self-reported questionnaire with a 4-month recall on health resource utilization and productivity losses immediately following the first FLS visit, and 4 and 12 months later. Unit costs derived from the national Dutch guideline for economic evaluations were used to compute societal and healthcare costs. Linear mixed-effect models, adjusted for confounders, were used to analyze societal and healthcare costs over time as well as the effect of fracture type on societal and healthcare costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 patients from two Dutch FLS centers were included, of whom 72 sustained a major fracture (hip, vertebral, humerus, or radius). Societal costs in the 4 months prior to the first visit (€2911) were significantly higher compared to societal costs 4 months (€711, p-value = 0.009) and 12 months later (€581, p-value = 0.001). Fracture type did not have a significant effect on total societal or healthcare costs. All costs 12 months after the initial visit were numerically lower for major fractures compared to others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Societal and healthcare costs in the year following the first FLS visit significantly decreased compared to those costs preceding the first visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"19 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Societal costs before and up to 1 year after the first fracture liaison service visit in patients requiring anti-osteoporosis treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Lieke Maas, Annelies Boonen, Caroline E Wyers, Sandrine Bours, Joop P van den Bergh, Silvia M Evers, Sander M J van Kuijk, Mickaël Hiligsmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11657-024-01390-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to estimate societal and healthcare costs incurred before and 1 year after the first fracture liaison services (FLS) visit and to explore differences in fracture type. All costs after 1 year significantly decreased compared to costs preceding the first visit. Fracture type did not significantly affect costs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited literature is available on resource utilization and costs of patients visiting fracture liaison services (FLS). This study aimed to estimate the societal and healthcare costs incurred by patients with a recent fracture requiring anti-osteoporosis medication before and 1 year after the first FLS visit and to explore differences according to fracture type.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Resource utilization was collected through a self-reported questionnaire with a 4-month recall on health resource utilization and productivity losses immediately following the first FLS visit, and 4 and 12 months later. Unit costs derived from the national Dutch guideline for economic evaluations were used to compute societal and healthcare costs. Linear mixed-effect models, adjusted for confounders, were used to analyze societal and healthcare costs over time as well as the effect of fracture type on societal and healthcare costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 patients from two Dutch FLS centers were included, of whom 72 sustained a major fracture (hip, vertebral, humerus, or radius). Societal costs in the 4 months prior to the first visit (€2911) were significantly higher compared to societal costs 4 months (€711, p-value = 0.009) and 12 months later (€581, p-value = 0.001). Fracture type did not have a significant effect on total societal or healthcare costs. All costs 12 months after the initial visit were numerically lower for major fractures compared to others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Societal and healthcare costs in the year following the first FLS visit significantly decreased compared to those costs preceding the first visit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090956/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-024-01390-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-024-01390-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在估算首次骨折联络服务(FLS)就诊前和就诊一年后的社会成本和医疗成本,并探讨骨折类型的差异。与首次就诊前的费用相比,1 年后的所有费用均明显下降。骨折类型对费用的影响不大:有关骨折联络服务(FLS)就诊患者的资源利用率和成本的文献有限。本研究旨在估算近期骨折并需要服用抗骨质疏松药物的患者在首次就诊前和就诊一年后的社会成本和医疗成本,并探讨不同骨折类型的差异:方法:通过自我报告问卷调查的方式收集资源利用情况,并在首次FLS就诊后的4个月内以及4个月和12个月后回忆医疗资源利用情况和生产力损失。根据荷兰国家经济评估指南得出的单位成本用于计算社会成本和医疗成本。在对混杂因素进行调整后,采用线性混合效应模型分析不同时期的社会成本和医疗成本,以及骨折类型对社会成本和医疗成本的影响:研究共纳入了来自荷兰两家FLS中心的126名患者,其中72人发生了重大骨折(髋部、脊椎、肱骨或桡骨)。首次就诊前 4 个月的社会成本(2911 欧元)明显高于 4 个月后的社会成本(711 欧元,P 值 = 0.009)和 12 个月后的社会成本(581 欧元,P 值 = 0.001)。骨折类型对社会总成本或医疗成本没有显著影响。初次就诊 12 个月后,重大骨折患者的所有费用均低于其他骨折患者:结论:与首次就诊前相比,首次FLS就诊后一年内的社会成本和医疗成本明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Societal costs before and up to 1 year after the first fracture liaison service visit in patients requiring anti-osteoporosis treatments.

This study aimed to estimate societal and healthcare costs incurred before and 1 year after the first fracture liaison services (FLS) visit and to explore differences in fracture type. All costs after 1 year significantly decreased compared to costs preceding the first visit. Fracture type did not significantly affect costs.

Introduction: Limited literature is available on resource utilization and costs of patients visiting fracture liaison services (FLS). This study aimed to estimate the societal and healthcare costs incurred by patients with a recent fracture requiring anti-osteoporosis medication before and 1 year after the first FLS visit and to explore differences according to fracture type.

Methods: Resource utilization was collected through a self-reported questionnaire with a 4-month recall on health resource utilization and productivity losses immediately following the first FLS visit, and 4 and 12 months later. Unit costs derived from the national Dutch guideline for economic evaluations were used to compute societal and healthcare costs. Linear mixed-effect models, adjusted for confounders, were used to analyze societal and healthcare costs over time as well as the effect of fracture type on societal and healthcare costs.

Results: A total of 126 patients from two Dutch FLS centers were included, of whom 72 sustained a major fracture (hip, vertebral, humerus, or radius). Societal costs in the 4 months prior to the first visit (€2911) were significantly higher compared to societal costs 4 months (€711, p-value = 0.009) and 12 months later (€581, p-value = 0.001). Fracture type did not have a significant effect on total societal or healthcare costs. All costs 12 months after the initial visit were numerically lower for major fractures compared to others.

Conclusion: Societal and healthcare costs in the year following the first FLS visit significantly decreased compared to those costs preceding the first visit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信