用从返祖皮肤中培养的表皮自体移植治疗表皮溶解性鱼鳞病和鱼鳞病。

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Kana Tanahashi, Michihiro Kono, Takenori Yoshikawa, Yuika Suzuki, Masukazu Inoie, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Fumie Kinoshita, Takuya Takeichi, Masashi Akiyama
{"title":"用从返祖皮肤中培养的表皮自体移植治疗表皮溶解性鱼鳞病和鱼鳞病。","authors":"Kana Tanahashi, Michihiro Kono, Takenori Yoshikawa, Yuika Suzuki, Masukazu Inoie, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Fumie Kinoshita, Takuya Takeichi, Masashi Akiyama","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljae193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No efficient treatment has yet been established for epidermolytic ichthyosis (EI), which is caused by pathogenic variants of KRT1 or KRT10. Patients with ichthyosis with confetti (IWC) have multiple normal-appearing spots, caused by the revertant somatic recombination of pathogenic variants that occurs at each spot independently. Additionally, some patients with EI have large areas of normal skin due to revertant postzygotic mosaicism.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the feasibility of transplanting cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs) produced from revertant epidermal keratinocytes in patients with EI and IWC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a clinical trial of treatment with CEAs produced from each patient's own revertant epidermal keratinocytes as a proof-of-concept study. This was a single-arm, open, unmasked, uncontrolled, single-assignment, treatment-purpose study. The primary outcome was the percentage area that lacked recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 4 weeks after the final transplant. The secondary outcome was the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 24 weeks after the initial transplantation. The trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTb041190097).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We successfully produced CEAs from genetically confirmed revertant skin from two patients with mosaic EI and from one patient with IWC and confirmed by amplicon sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis that the CEAs mainly consisted of revertant wild-type cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis confirmed the normal proliferation and safety profiling of CEAs. CEAs were transplanted onto desquamated lesional sites in the patients. Four weeks post-transplantation, the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions in the three patients was 40%, 100% and 100% respectively, although recurrence of ichthyosis lesions was seen at the site of CEA transplantation in all three patients at 24 weeks post-transplantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CEAs from normal skin have the potential to be a safe and local treatment option for EI and IWC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treating epidermolytic ichthyosis and ichthyosis with confetti with epidermal autografts cultured from revertant skin.\",\"authors\":\"Kana Tanahashi, Michihiro Kono, Takenori Yoshikawa, Yuika Suzuki, Masukazu Inoie, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Fumie Kinoshita, Takuya Takeichi, Masashi Akiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjd/ljae193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No efficient treatment has yet been established for epidermolytic ichthyosis (EI), which is caused by pathogenic variants of KRT1 or KRT10. Patients with ichthyosis with confetti (IWC) have multiple normal-appearing spots, caused by the revertant somatic recombination of pathogenic variants that occurs at each spot independently. Additionally, some patients with EI have large areas of normal skin due to revertant postzygotic mosaicism.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the feasibility of transplanting cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs) produced from revertant epidermal keratinocytes in patients with EI and IWC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a clinical trial of treatment with CEAs produced from each patient's own revertant epidermal keratinocytes as a proof-of-concept study. This was a single-arm, open, unmasked, uncontrolled, single-assignment, treatment-purpose study. The primary outcome was the percentage area that lacked recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 4 weeks after the final transplant. The secondary outcome was the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 24 weeks after the initial transplantation. The trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTb041190097).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We successfully produced CEAs from genetically confirmed revertant skin from two patients with mosaic EI and from one patient with IWC and confirmed by amplicon sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis that the CEAs mainly consisted of revertant wild-type cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis confirmed the normal proliferation and safety profiling of CEAs. CEAs were transplanted onto desquamated lesional sites in the patients. Four weeks post-transplantation, the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions in the three patients was 40%, 100% and 100% respectively, although recurrence of ichthyosis lesions was seen at the site of CEA transplantation in all three patients at 24 weeks post-transplantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CEAs from normal skin have the potential to be a safe and local treatment option for EI and IWC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae193\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae193","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于由KRT1或KRT10致病变体引起的表皮溶解性鱼鳞病(EI),目前尚未找到有效的治疗方法。带斑鱼鳞病(IWC)患者表现出多个外观正常的斑点,这是由于致病变异体的还原性体细胞重组在每个斑点上独立发生所致。此外,一些白塞病患者的正常皮肤上也有大面积的白斑,这是由于后染色体嵌合的返祖性所致:目的:评估在 EI 和 IWC 患者中移植由返祖表皮角质细胞产生的培养表皮自体移植物(CEA)的可行性:作为一项概念验证研究,我们进行了一项临床试验,使用由每位患者自身的还原性表皮角质细胞培养出的 CEAs 进行治疗。这是一项单臂、开放(未使用掩蔽)、非对照、单一分配、以治疗为目的的研究。主要结果是最终移植 4 周后鱼鳞病皮损不再复发的面积率(%)。次要结果是初次移植 24 周后鱼鳞病皮损不再复发的面积率(%):通过扩增子测序和液滴数字 PCR 分析,我们成功地从两名马赛克 EI 患者和一名 IWC 患者经基因证实的逆转体皮肤中制备出了 CEA,并从基因上证实 CEA 主要由逆转体野生型细胞组成。单细胞 RNA 测序分析证实了 CEAs 的正常增殖和安全性。CEAs 被移植到患者的脱屑病变部位。移植四周后,三例患者的鱼鳞病皮损无复发区域率分别为39.52%、100.0%和100.0%,但在移植24周后,三例患者的CEA移植部位均出现鱼鳞病皮损复发:结论:来自正常皮肤的CEA有可能成为EI和IWC的一种安全的局部治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treating epidermolytic ichthyosis and ichthyosis with confetti with epidermal autografts cultured from revertant skin.

Background: No efficient treatment has yet been established for epidermolytic ichthyosis (EI), which is caused by pathogenic variants of KRT1 or KRT10. Patients with ichthyosis with confetti (IWC) have multiple normal-appearing spots, caused by the revertant somatic recombination of pathogenic variants that occurs at each spot independently. Additionally, some patients with EI have large areas of normal skin due to revertant postzygotic mosaicism.

Objectives: To assess the feasibility of transplanting cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs) produced from revertant epidermal keratinocytes in patients with EI and IWC.

Methods: We performed a clinical trial of treatment with CEAs produced from each patient's own revertant epidermal keratinocytes as a proof-of-concept study. This was a single-arm, open, unmasked, uncontrolled, single-assignment, treatment-purpose study. The primary outcome was the percentage area that lacked recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 4 weeks after the final transplant. The secondary outcome was the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 24 weeks after the initial transplantation. The trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTb041190097).

Results: We successfully produced CEAs from genetically confirmed revertant skin from two patients with mosaic EI and from one patient with IWC and confirmed by amplicon sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis that the CEAs mainly consisted of revertant wild-type cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis confirmed the normal proliferation and safety profiling of CEAs. CEAs were transplanted onto desquamated lesional sites in the patients. Four weeks post-transplantation, the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions in the three patients was 40%, 100% and 100% respectively, although recurrence of ichthyosis lesions was seen at the site of CEA transplantation in all three patients at 24 weeks post-transplantation.

Conclusions: CEAs from normal skin have the potential to be a safe and local treatment option for EI and IWC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信