{"title":"全面分析CAR T细胞疗法对复发或难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Sebastian Emmanuel Willyanto, Yohanes Audric Alimsjah, Krisanto Tanjaya, Aekkachai Tuekprakhon, Aulia Rahmi Pawestri","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2349796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relapse/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (r/r B-ALL) represents paediatric cancer with a challenging prognosis. CAR T-cell treatment, considered an advanced treatment, remains controversial due to high relapse rates and adverse events. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy for r/r B-ALL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was performed on four databases. Efficacy parameters included minimal residual disease negative complete remission (MRD-CR) and relapse rate (RR). Safety parameters constituted cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-CD22 showed superior efficacy with the highest MRD-CR event rate and lowest RR, compared to anti-CD19. Combining CAR T-cell therapy with haploidentical stem cell transplantation improved RR. Safety-wise, bispecific anti-CD19/22 had the lowest CRS rate, and anti-CD22 showed the fewest ICANS. Analysis of the costimulatory receptors showed that adding CD28ζ to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing relapses with favorable safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Choosing a more efficacious and safer CAR T-cell treatment is crucial for improving overall survival in acute leukaemia. Beyond the promising anti-CD22 CAR T-cell, exploring costimulatory domains and new CD targets could enhance treatment effectiveness for r/r B-ALL.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":"2349796"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Emmanuel Willyanto, Yohanes Audric Alimsjah, Krisanto Tanjaya, Aekkachai Tuekprakhon, Aulia Rahmi Pawestri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2024.2349796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relapse/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (r/r B-ALL) represents paediatric cancer with a challenging prognosis. CAR T-cell treatment, considered an advanced treatment, remains controversial due to high relapse rates and adverse events. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy for r/r B-ALL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was performed on four databases. Efficacy parameters included minimal residual disease negative complete remission (MRD-CR) and relapse rate (RR). Safety parameters constituted cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-CD22 showed superior efficacy with the highest MRD-CR event rate and lowest RR, compared to anti-CD19. Combining CAR T-cell therapy with haploidentical stem cell transplantation improved RR. Safety-wise, bispecific anti-CD19/22 had the lowest CRS rate, and anti-CD22 showed the fewest ICANS. Analysis of the costimulatory receptors showed that adding CD28ζ to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing relapses with favorable safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Choosing a more efficacious and safer CAR T-cell treatment is crucial for improving overall survival in acute leukaemia. Beyond the promising anti-CD22 CAR T-cell, exploring costimulatory domains and new CD targets could enhance treatment effectiveness for r/r B-ALL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"2349796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095278/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2349796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2349796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:复发/难治性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(r/r B-ALL)是预后极具挑战性的儿科癌症。CAR T细胞治疗被认为是一种先进的治疗方法,但由于复发率高和不良反应多,仍存在争议。本研究评估了CAR T细胞疗法治疗r/r B-ALL的有效性和安全性:方法:在四个数据库中进行文献检索。疗效参数包括最小残留病灶阴性完全缓解(MRD-CR)和复发率(RR)。安全性参数包括细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS):结果:与抗-CD19相比,抗-CD22显示出更优越的疗效,MRD-CR事件发生率最高,RR最低。将CAR T细胞疗法与单倍体干细胞移植相结合可提高RR。安全性方面,双特异性抗CD19/22的CRS率最低,抗CD22的ICANS最少。对成本刺激受体的分析表明,在抗CD19 CAR T细胞中加入CD28ζ可在减少复发方面显示出更优越的疗效,同时具有良好的安全性:结论:选择一种更有效、更安全的 CAR T 细胞疗法对于提高急性白血病患者的总生存率至关重要。结论:选择更有效、更安全的 CAR T 细胞疗法对提高急性白血病患者的总体生存率至关重要。除了前景广阔的抗 CD22 CAR T 细胞外,探索 costimulatory domains 和新的 CD 靶点也能提高 r/r B-ALL 的治疗效果。
Comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Relapse/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (r/r B-ALL) represents paediatric cancer with a challenging prognosis. CAR T-cell treatment, considered an advanced treatment, remains controversial due to high relapse rates and adverse events. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy for r/r B-ALL.
Methods: The literature search was performed on four databases. Efficacy parameters included minimal residual disease negative complete remission (MRD-CR) and relapse rate (RR). Safety parameters constituted cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS).
Results: Anti-CD22 showed superior efficacy with the highest MRD-CR event rate and lowest RR, compared to anti-CD19. Combining CAR T-cell therapy with haploidentical stem cell transplantation improved RR. Safety-wise, bispecific anti-CD19/22 had the lowest CRS rate, and anti-CD22 showed the fewest ICANS. Analysis of the costimulatory receptors showed that adding CD28ζ to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing relapses with favorable safety profiles.
Conclusion: Choosing a more efficacious and safer CAR T-cell treatment is crucial for improving overall survival in acute leukaemia. Beyond the promising anti-CD22 CAR T-cell, exploring costimulatory domains and new CD targets could enhance treatment effectiveness for r/r B-ALL.