分析沙特阿拉伯一家三甲医院剖面自动配药柜的超控模式。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Esam Mohamed Said, Imraan Joosub, Moustafa M. Elashkar, Khaled F. Albusaysi, Khalid Refi
{"title":"分析沙特阿拉伯一家三甲医院剖面自动配药柜的超控模式。","authors":"Esam Mohamed Said,&nbsp;Imraan Joosub,&nbsp;Moustafa M. Elashkar,&nbsp;Khaled F. Albusaysi,&nbsp;Khalid Refi","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inappropriate automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) overrides pose a significant risk to patient safety. Bypassing pharmacist review during these overrides removes a vital safety check, leaving nurses to review complex medication orders alone. This can lead to overlooking incorrect orders and significantly increasing the potential for medication errors. While Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) guidelines promote profiled ADCs and safe override practices, there is no national standard for acceptable override rates.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assessing the appropriateness of ADC overrides of profiled ADCs at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia in accordance with ISMP guidelines (third core safety process).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective observational study reviewed all override transactions for 13 profiled ADCs over a 3-month period, from 1 October 2022 until 31 December 2022. The target override rate was set at no more than 5%. After applying exclusions, the relevant data fields were extracted from electronic records of 2 integrated systems: the Omnicell dashboard and the BESTCare hospital information system. The study assessed whether the override transactions complying with the standard elements required for appropriate ADC overrides in accordance with ISMP recommendations and hospital regulations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six hundred sixty-four override transactions from profiled ADCs were reviewed and evaluated. Although the overall override limit for profiled ADCs was met (1.9%), multiple inappropriate override practices were revealed. These inappropriate practices are missing physician orders (33.7%), undocumented verbal orders (31.5%), nonurgent physician orders (11%), missing (8.4%) or delayed (33.7%) administration records, and unrecognized override errors (5.3%). Only 3 (0.5%) met all the standard elements required for ADC overrides.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The target override threshold of 5% is inadequate to demonstrate sufficient adherence to the standard elements of appropriate overrides or effectively prevent medication errors. Consequently, a significantly lower target threshold override limit, well below 5%, should be considered, especially with 24-hour pharmacy services and fully integrated computerized physician order entry with ADC system. A multidisciplinary override surveillance team is considered essential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing override patterns in profiled automated dispensing cabinets at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"Esam Mohamed Said,&nbsp;Imraan Joosub,&nbsp;Moustafa M. Elashkar,&nbsp;Khaled F. Albusaysi,&nbsp;Khalid Refi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inappropriate automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) overrides pose a significant risk to patient safety. Bypassing pharmacist review during these overrides removes a vital safety check, leaving nurses to review complex medication orders alone. This can lead to overlooking incorrect orders and significantly increasing the potential for medication errors. While Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) guidelines promote profiled ADCs and safe override practices, there is no national standard for acceptable override rates.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assessing the appropriateness of ADC overrides of profiled ADCs at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia in accordance with ISMP guidelines (third core safety process).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective observational study reviewed all override transactions for 13 profiled ADCs over a 3-month period, from 1 October 2022 until 31 December 2022. The target override rate was set at no more than 5%. After applying exclusions, the relevant data fields were extracted from electronic records of 2 integrated systems: the Omnicell dashboard and the BESTCare hospital information system. The study assessed whether the override transactions complying with the standard elements required for appropriate ADC overrides in accordance with ISMP recommendations and hospital regulations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six hundred sixty-four override transactions from profiled ADCs were reviewed and evaluated. Although the overall override limit for profiled ADCs was met (1.9%), multiple inappropriate override practices were revealed. These inappropriate practices are missing physician orders (33.7%), undocumented verbal orders (31.5%), nonurgent physician orders (11%), missing (8.4%) or delayed (33.7%) administration records, and unrecognized override errors (5.3%). Only 3 (0.5%) met all the standard elements required for ADC overrides.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The target override threshold of 5% is inadequate to demonstrate sufficient adherence to the standard elements of appropriate overrides or effectively prevent medication errors. Consequently, a significantly lower target threshold override limit, well below 5%, should be considered, especially with 24-hour pharmacy services and fully integrated computerized physician order entry with ADC system. A multidisciplinary override surveillance team is considered essential.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001432\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124001432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不适当的 ADC 否决对患者安全构成重大风险。在这些超控过程中绕过药剂师的审查,取消了一项重要的安全检查,让护士独自审查复杂的用药医嘱。这可能会导致忽略不正确的医嘱,大大增加用药错误的可能性。虽然 ISMP 指导方针提倡使用有特征的 ADC 和安全的覆盖操作,但目前还没有可接受覆盖率的国家标准:根据 ISMP 指南(第 3 个核心安全流程),评估沙特阿拉伯一家三级甲等医院的 ADC 否决是否适当:这项回顾性观察研究回顾了从 2022 年 10 月 1 日到 2022 年 12 月 31 日的 3 个月时间内 13 个已配置 ADC 的所有覆盖交易。目标超驰率设定为不超过 5%。数据排除后,从两个集成系统(Omnicell® 仪表板和 BESTCare® HIS)的电子记录中提取数据。研究评估了覆盖交易是否符合 ISMP 建议和医院规定的适当 ADC 覆盖所需的标准要素:审查并评估了 664 项来自已配置 ADC 的覆盖交易。尽管已配置的 ADC 的总体覆盖率达到了限制要求(1.9%),但仍发现了多种不恰当的覆盖做法。这些不恰当的做法包括遗失医嘱(33.7%)、未记录口头医嘱(31.5%)、非紧急医嘱(11%)、遗失(8.4%)或延迟(33.7%)管理记录,以及未识别的覆盖错误(5.3%)。只有 3 例(0.5%)符合 ADC 否决所需的所有标准要素:结论:5% 的目标超限阈值不足以证明充分遵守了适当超限的标准要素,也无法有效预防用药错误。因此,应考虑将目标超限阈值大大降低,远低于 5%,尤其是在 24 小时药房服务以及 CPOE 与 ADC 系统完全集成的情况下。一个多学科的超限监控小组被认为是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing override patterns in profiled automated dispensing cabinets at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia

Background

Inappropriate automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) overrides pose a significant risk to patient safety. Bypassing pharmacist review during these overrides removes a vital safety check, leaving nurses to review complex medication orders alone. This can lead to overlooking incorrect orders and significantly increasing the potential for medication errors. While Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) guidelines promote profiled ADCs and safe override practices, there is no national standard for acceptable override rates.

Objectives

Assessing the appropriateness of ADC overrides of profiled ADCs at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia in accordance with ISMP guidelines (third core safety process).

Methods

This retrospective observational study reviewed all override transactions for 13 profiled ADCs over a 3-month period, from 1 October 2022 until 31 December 2022. The target override rate was set at no more than 5%. After applying exclusions, the relevant data fields were extracted from electronic records of 2 integrated systems: the Omnicell dashboard and the BESTCare hospital information system. The study assessed whether the override transactions complying with the standard elements required for appropriate ADC overrides in accordance with ISMP recommendations and hospital regulations.

Results

Six hundred sixty-four override transactions from profiled ADCs were reviewed and evaluated. Although the overall override limit for profiled ADCs was met (1.9%), multiple inappropriate override practices were revealed. These inappropriate practices are missing physician orders (33.7%), undocumented verbal orders (31.5%), nonurgent physician orders (11%), missing (8.4%) or delayed (33.7%) administration records, and unrecognized override errors (5.3%). Only 3 (0.5%) met all the standard elements required for ADC overrides.

Conclusion

The target override threshold of 5% is inadequate to demonstrate sufficient adherence to the standard elements of appropriate overrides or effectively prevent medication errors. Consequently, a significantly lower target threshold override limit, well below 5%, should be considered, especially with 24-hour pharmacy services and fully integrated computerized physician order entry with ADC system. A multidisciplinary override surveillance team is considered essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信