Katarzyna Okurowska, Peter N Monk, Esther Karunakaran
{"title":"铜绿假单胞菌体外猪角膜炎模型对常用抗生素的耐受性增强。","authors":"Katarzyna Okurowska, Peter N Monk, Esther Karunakaran","doi":"10.1099/mic.0.001459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>. Bacterial keratitis, particularly caused by <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, is challenging to treat because of multi-drug tolerance, often associated with the formation of biofilms. Antibiotics in development are typically evaluated against planktonic bacteria in a culture medium, which may not accurately represent the complexity of infections <i>in vivo</i>.<b>Hypothesis/Gap Statement.</b> Developing a reliable, economic <i>ex vivo</i> keratitis model that replicates some complexity of tissue infections could facilitate a deeper understanding of antibiotic efficacy, thus aiding in the optimization of treatment strategies for bacterial keratitis.<b>Methodology</b>. Here we investigated the efficacy of three commonly used antibiotics (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and meropenem) against <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> cytotoxic strain PA14 and invasive strain PA01 using an <i>ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model.<b>Results</b>. Both strains of <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were susceptible to the MIC of the three tested antibiotics. However, significantly higher concentrations were necessary to inhibit bacterial growth in the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) assay, with both strains tolerating concentrations greater than 512 mg l<sup>-1</sup> of meropenem. When MIC and higher concentrations than MBEC (1024 mg l<sup>-1</sup>) of antibiotics were applied, ciprofloxacin exhibited the highest potency against both <i>P. aeruginosa</i> strains, followed by meropenem, while gentamicin showed the least potency. Despite this, none of the antibiotic concentrations used effectively cleared the infection, even after 18 h of continuous exposure.<b>Conclusions.</b> Further exploration of antibiotic concentrations and aligning dosing with clinical studies to validate the model is needed. Nonetheless, our <i>ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model could be a valuable tool for assessing antibiotic efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased tolerance to commonly used antibiotics in a <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model.\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Okurowska, Peter N Monk, Esther Karunakaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/mic.0.001459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>. Bacterial keratitis, particularly caused by <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, is challenging to treat because of multi-drug tolerance, often associated with the formation of biofilms. Antibiotics in development are typically evaluated against planktonic bacteria in a culture medium, which may not accurately represent the complexity of infections <i>in vivo</i>.<b>Hypothesis/Gap Statement.</b> Developing a reliable, economic <i>ex vivo</i> keratitis model that replicates some complexity of tissue infections could facilitate a deeper understanding of antibiotic efficacy, thus aiding in the optimization of treatment strategies for bacterial keratitis.<b>Methodology</b>. Here we investigated the efficacy of three commonly used antibiotics (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and meropenem) against <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> cytotoxic strain PA14 and invasive strain PA01 using an <i>ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model.<b>Results</b>. Both strains of <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were susceptible to the MIC of the three tested antibiotics. However, significantly higher concentrations were necessary to inhibit bacterial growth in the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) assay, with both strains tolerating concentrations greater than 512 mg l<sup>-1</sup> of meropenem. When MIC and higher concentrations than MBEC (1024 mg l<sup>-1</sup>) of antibiotics were applied, ciprofloxacin exhibited the highest potency against both <i>P. aeruginosa</i> strains, followed by meropenem, while gentamicin showed the least potency. Despite this, none of the antibiotic concentrations used effectively cleared the infection, even after 18 h of continuous exposure.<b>Conclusions.</b> Further exploration of antibiotic concentrations and aligning dosing with clinical studies to validate the model is needed. Nonetheless, our <i>ex vivo</i> porcine keratitis model could be a valuable tool for assessing antibiotic efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165664/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言。细菌性角膜炎,尤其是由铜绿假单胞菌引起的细菌性角膜炎,由于对多种药物的耐受性,往往与生物膜的形成有关,因此治疗具有挑战性。开发中的抗生素通常是针对培养基中的浮游细菌进行评估,这可能无法准确反映体内感染的复杂性。开发一种可靠、经济的体外角膜炎模型,复制组织感染的某些复杂性,有助于深入了解抗生素的疗效,从而帮助优化细菌性角膜炎的治疗策略。在此,我们利用猪角膜炎体外模型研究了三种常用抗生素(庆大霉素、环丙沙星和美罗培南)对铜绿假单胞菌细胞毒性菌株 PA14 和侵袭性菌株 PA01 的疗效。两株铜绿假单胞菌对三种测试抗生素的 MIC 均敏感。然而,在最小生物膜根除浓度(MBEC)试验中,抑制细菌生长所需的浓度明显更高,两株菌株都能耐受浓度高于 512 毫克升/升的美罗培南。当抗生素的 MIC 和浓度高于 MBEC(1024 毫克/升)时,环丙沙星对两种铜绿假单胞菌菌株的效力最高,其次是美罗培南,而庆大霉素的效力最低。尽管如此,所使用的抗生素浓度都不能有效清除感染,即使在连续接触 18 小时后也是如此。需要进一步探讨抗生素浓度,并根据临床研究调整剂量,以验证模型。尽管如此,我们的体外猪角膜炎模型仍可作为评估抗生素疗效的重要工具。
Increased tolerance to commonly used antibiotics in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa ex vivo porcine keratitis model.
Introduction. Bacterial keratitis, particularly caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is challenging to treat because of multi-drug tolerance, often associated with the formation of biofilms. Antibiotics in development are typically evaluated against planktonic bacteria in a culture medium, which may not accurately represent the complexity of infections in vivo.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Developing a reliable, economic ex vivo keratitis model that replicates some complexity of tissue infections could facilitate a deeper understanding of antibiotic efficacy, thus aiding in the optimization of treatment strategies for bacterial keratitis.Methodology. Here we investigated the efficacy of three commonly used antibiotics (gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and meropenem) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa cytotoxic strain PA14 and invasive strain PA01 using an ex vivo porcine keratitis model.Results. Both strains of P. aeruginosa were susceptible to the MIC of the three tested antibiotics. However, significantly higher concentrations were necessary to inhibit bacterial growth in the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) assay, with both strains tolerating concentrations greater than 512 mg l-1 of meropenem. When MIC and higher concentrations than MBEC (1024 mg l-1) of antibiotics were applied, ciprofloxacin exhibited the highest potency against both P. aeruginosa strains, followed by meropenem, while gentamicin showed the least potency. Despite this, none of the antibiotic concentrations used effectively cleared the infection, even after 18 h of continuous exposure.Conclusions. Further exploration of antibiotic concentrations and aligning dosing with clinical studies to validate the model is needed. Nonetheless, our ex vivo porcine keratitis model could be a valuable tool for assessing antibiotic efficacy.