乳腺癌患者化疗的症状性不良事件:使用 CTCAE、PRO-CTCAE 和 EORTC QLQ-C30。

IF 0.7 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Hiromi Arahori, Kazuya Kondo, Yoshie Imai, Takae Bando, Hiroaki Inoue, Soichiro Sasa, Hiromitsu Takizawa
{"title":"乳腺癌患者化疗的症状性不良事件:使用 CTCAE、PRO-CTCAE 和 EORTC QLQ-C30。","authors":"Hiromi Arahori, Kazuya Kondo, Yoshie Imai, Takae Bando, Hiroaki Inoue, Soichiro Sasa, Hiromitsu Takizawa","doi":"10.2152/jmi.71.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is used as a tool to evaluate the adverse events (AE) of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Since CTCAE by medical providers underestimates AE more than patient-reported outcomes (PRO), the National Cancer Institute developed PRO-CTCAE. The present study investigated differences between symptoms detected using CTCAE by medical providers and PRO-CTCAE by breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients received chemotherapy comprising epirubicin and cyclophosphamide pre- or postoperatively. AE were evaluated using 4 questionnaires:PRO-CTCAE, CTCAE, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-30), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) after 1, 2, and 3 courses of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients were registered. Regarding the recognition of psychological symptoms, such as fatigue, anxiety, and discouragement, and subjective symptoms, including heart palpitations and shortness of breath, PRO using PRO-CTCAE was significantly higher than medical provider-recognized outcomes using CTCAE. Concerning the recognition of regimen-specific symptoms, such as vomiting, nausea, and decreased appetite, medical provider- recognized outcomes were the same or higher than PRO. In QLQ-C30, the physical and role functions, fatigue and dyspnea significantly worsened after 2 and 3 courses of chemotherapy. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 82-91, February, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":46910,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symptomatic adverse events of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients:Using CTCAE, PRO-CTCAE, and EORTC QLQ-C30.\",\"authors\":\"Hiromi Arahori, Kazuya Kondo, Yoshie Imai, Takae Bando, Hiroaki Inoue, Soichiro Sasa, Hiromitsu Takizawa\",\"doi\":\"10.2152/jmi.71.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is used as a tool to evaluate the adverse events (AE) of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Since CTCAE by medical providers underestimates AE more than patient-reported outcomes (PRO), the National Cancer Institute developed PRO-CTCAE. The present study investigated differences between symptoms detected using CTCAE by medical providers and PRO-CTCAE by breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients received chemotherapy comprising epirubicin and cyclophosphamide pre- or postoperatively. AE were evaluated using 4 questionnaires:PRO-CTCAE, CTCAE, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-30), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) after 1, 2, and 3 courses of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients were registered. Regarding the recognition of psychological symptoms, such as fatigue, anxiety, and discouragement, and subjective symptoms, including heart palpitations and shortness of breath, PRO using PRO-CTCAE was significantly higher than medical provider-recognized outcomes using CTCAE. Concerning the recognition of regimen-specific symptoms, such as vomiting, nausea, and decreased appetite, medical provider- recognized outcomes were the same or higher than PRO. In QLQ-C30, the physical and role functions, fatigue and dyspnea significantly worsened after 2 and 3 courses of chemotherapy. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 82-91, February, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.71.82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.71.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)被用作评估癌症患者化疗不良事件(AE)的工具。由于医疗机构的 CTCAE 比患者报告的结果(PRO)更容易低估 AE,美国国家癌症研究所开发了 PRO-CTCAE。本研究调查了医疗机构使用 CTCAE 检测到的症状与乳腺癌患者使用 PRO-CTCAE 检测到的症状之间的差异:患者在术前或术后接受由表柔比星和环磷酰胺组成的化疗。方法:患者在术前或术后接受由表柔比星和环磷酰胺组成的化疗,化疗1、2和3个疗程后使用4种问卷对AE进行评估:PRO-CTCAE、CTCAE、欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC-QQLQ-30)以及医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS):共有 42 名患者登记在册。在对疲劳、焦虑和灰心等心理症状以及心悸和气短等主观症状的识别方面,使用 PRO-CTCAE 的 PRO 显著高于使用 CTCAE 的医务人员识别结果。在对呕吐、恶心和食欲下降等治疗方案特有症状的识别方面,医疗服务提供者识别的结果与 PRO 相同或高于 PRO。在 QLQ-C30 中,身体和角色功能、疲劳和呼吸困难在化疗 2 个疗程和 3 个疗程后明显恶化。J. Med.Invest.71 : 82-91, February, 2024.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Symptomatic adverse events of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients:Using CTCAE, PRO-CTCAE, and EORTC QLQ-C30.

Background: The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is used as a tool to evaluate the adverse events (AE) of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Since CTCAE by medical providers underestimates AE more than patient-reported outcomes (PRO), the National Cancer Institute developed PRO-CTCAE. The present study investigated differences between symptoms detected using CTCAE by medical providers and PRO-CTCAE by breast cancer patients.

Methods: Patients received chemotherapy comprising epirubicin and cyclophosphamide pre- or postoperatively. AE were evaluated using 4 questionnaires:PRO-CTCAE, CTCAE, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-30), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) after 1, 2, and 3 courses of chemotherapy.

Results: Forty-two patients were registered. Regarding the recognition of psychological symptoms, such as fatigue, anxiety, and discouragement, and subjective symptoms, including heart palpitations and shortness of breath, PRO using PRO-CTCAE was significantly higher than medical provider-recognized outcomes using CTCAE. Concerning the recognition of regimen-specific symptoms, such as vomiting, nausea, and decreased appetite, medical provider- recognized outcomes were the same or higher than PRO. In QLQ-C30, the physical and role functions, fatigue and dyspnea significantly worsened after 2 and 3 courses of chemotherapy. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 82-91, February, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信