早产新生儿和小鼠幼崽的肠道微生物组、抗性组和霉菌生物组:抗菌治疗或益生菌预防缺乏持久效果。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Elizabeth Y Yuu, Christoph Bührer, Tim Eckmanns, Marcus Fulde, Michaela Herz, Oliver Kurzai, Christin Lindstedt, Gianni Panagiotou, Vitor C Piro, Aleksandar Radonic, Bernhard Y Renard, Annicka Reuss, Sara Leal Siliceo, Nadja Thielemann, Andrea Thürmer, Kira van Vorst, Lothar H Wieler, Sebastian Haller
{"title":"早产新生儿和小鼠幼崽的肠道微生物组、抗性组和霉菌生物组:抗菌治疗或益生菌预防缺乏持久效果。","authors":"Elizabeth Y Yuu, Christoph Bührer, Tim Eckmanns, Marcus Fulde, Michaela Herz, Oliver Kurzai, Christin Lindstedt, Gianni Panagiotou, Vitor C Piro, Aleksandar Radonic, Bernhard Y Renard, Annicka Reuss, Sara Leal Siliceo, Nadja Thielemann, Andrea Thürmer, Kira van Vorst, Lothar H Wieler, Sebastian Haller","doi":"10.1186/s13099-024-00616-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing our understanding of the underlying influences of medical interventions on the microbiome, resistome and mycobiome of preterm born infants holds significant potential for advancing infection prevention and treatment strategies. We conducted a prospective quasi-intervention study to better understand how antibiotics, and probiotics, and other medical factors influence the gut development of preterm infants. A controlled neonatal mice model was conducted in parallel, designed to closely reflect and predict exposures. Preterm infants and neonatal mice were stratified into four groups: antibiotics only, probiotics only, antibiotics followed by probiotics, and none of these interventions. Stool samples from both preterm infants and neonatal mice were collected at varying time points and analyzed by 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing, ITS amplicon sequencing and whole genome shotgun sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The human infant microbiomes showed an unexpectedly high degree of heterogeneity. Little impact from medical exposure (antibiotics/probiotics) was observed on the strain patterns, however, Bifidobacterium bifidum was found more abundant after exposure to probiotics, regardless of prior antibiotic administration. Twenty-seven antibiotic resistant genes were identified in the resistome. High intra-variability was evident within the different treatment groups. Lastly, we found significant effects of antibiotics and probiotics on the mycobiome but not on the microbiome and resistome of preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our analyses showed transient effects, these results provide positive motivation to continue the research on the effects of medical interventions on the microbiome, resistome and mycobiome of preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12833,"journal":{"name":"Gut Pathogens","volume":"16 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11089716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The gut microbiome, resistome, and mycobiome in preterm newborn infants and mouse pups: lack of lasting effects by antimicrobial therapy or probiotic prophylaxis.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Y Yuu, Christoph Bührer, Tim Eckmanns, Marcus Fulde, Michaela Herz, Oliver Kurzai, Christin Lindstedt, Gianni Panagiotou, Vitor C Piro, Aleksandar Radonic, Bernhard Y Renard, Annicka Reuss, Sara Leal Siliceo, Nadja Thielemann, Andrea Thürmer, Kira van Vorst, Lothar H Wieler, Sebastian Haller\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13099-024-00616-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing our understanding of the underlying influences of medical interventions on the microbiome, resistome and mycobiome of preterm born infants holds significant potential for advancing infection prevention and treatment strategies. We conducted a prospective quasi-intervention study to better understand how antibiotics, and probiotics, and other medical factors influence the gut development of preterm infants. A controlled neonatal mice model was conducted in parallel, designed to closely reflect and predict exposures. Preterm infants and neonatal mice were stratified into four groups: antibiotics only, probiotics only, antibiotics followed by probiotics, and none of these interventions. Stool samples from both preterm infants and neonatal mice were collected at varying time points and analyzed by 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing, ITS amplicon sequencing and whole genome shotgun sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The human infant microbiomes showed an unexpectedly high degree of heterogeneity. Little impact from medical exposure (antibiotics/probiotics) was observed on the strain patterns, however, Bifidobacterium bifidum was found more abundant after exposure to probiotics, regardless of prior antibiotic administration. Twenty-seven antibiotic resistant genes were identified in the resistome. High intra-variability was evident within the different treatment groups. Lastly, we found significant effects of antibiotics and probiotics on the mycobiome but not on the microbiome and resistome of preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our analyses showed transient effects, these results provide positive motivation to continue the research on the effects of medical interventions on the microbiome, resistome and mycobiome of preterm infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gut Pathogens\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11089716/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gut Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-024-00616-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-024-00616-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:加强我们对医疗干预对早产儿微生物组、抗药性组和霉菌生物组的潜在影响的了解,对于推进感染预防和治疗策略具有重大潜力。我们开展了一项前瞻性准干预研究,以更好地了解抗生素、益生菌和其他医疗因素如何影响早产儿的肠道发育。与此同时,我们还进行了一项对照新生儿小鼠模型试验,旨在密切反映和预测暴露情况。早产儿和新生小鼠被分为四组:仅使用抗生素组、仅使用益生菌组、先使用抗生素后使用益生菌组和未使用上述干预措施组。在不同的时间点收集早产儿和新生小鼠的粪便样本,并通过 16 S rRNA 扩增子测序、ITS 扩增子测序和全基因组枪式测序进行分析:结果:人类婴儿微生物组显示出意想不到的高度异质性。然而,无论之前是否服用过抗生素,双歧杆菌在服用益生菌后含量更高。耐药性基因组中发现了 27 个抗生素耐药基因。不同治疗组的内部变异性很明显。最后,我们发现抗生素和益生菌对早产儿的霉菌生物群有明显影响,但对微生物群和抗药性群没有影响:尽管我们的分析显示了短暂的影响,但这些结果为继续研究医疗干预对早产儿微生物组、抗药性组和霉菌生物组的影响提供了积极的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The gut microbiome, resistome, and mycobiome in preterm newborn infants and mouse pups: lack of lasting effects by antimicrobial therapy or probiotic prophylaxis.

Background: Enhancing our understanding of the underlying influences of medical interventions on the microbiome, resistome and mycobiome of preterm born infants holds significant potential for advancing infection prevention and treatment strategies. We conducted a prospective quasi-intervention study to better understand how antibiotics, and probiotics, and other medical factors influence the gut development of preterm infants. A controlled neonatal mice model was conducted in parallel, designed to closely reflect and predict exposures. Preterm infants and neonatal mice were stratified into four groups: antibiotics only, probiotics only, antibiotics followed by probiotics, and none of these interventions. Stool samples from both preterm infants and neonatal mice were collected at varying time points and analyzed by 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing, ITS amplicon sequencing and whole genome shotgun sequencing.

Results: The human infant microbiomes showed an unexpectedly high degree of heterogeneity. Little impact from medical exposure (antibiotics/probiotics) was observed on the strain patterns, however, Bifidobacterium bifidum was found more abundant after exposure to probiotics, regardless of prior antibiotic administration. Twenty-seven antibiotic resistant genes were identified in the resistome. High intra-variability was evident within the different treatment groups. Lastly, we found significant effects of antibiotics and probiotics on the mycobiome but not on the microbiome and resistome of preterm infants.

Conclusions: Although our analyses showed transient effects, these results provide positive motivation to continue the research on the effects of medical interventions on the microbiome, resistome and mycobiome of preterm infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gut Pathogens
Gut Pathogens GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Gut Pathogens is a fast publishing, inclusive and prominent international journal which recognizes the need for a publishing platform uniquely tailored to reflect the full breadth of research in the biology and medicine of pathogens, commensals and functional microbiota of the gut. The journal publishes basic, clinical and cutting-edge research on all aspects of the above mentioned organisms including probiotic bacteria and yeasts and their products. The scope also covers the related ecology, molecular genetics, physiology and epidemiology of these microbes. The journal actively invites timely reports on the novel aspects of genomics, metagenomics, microbiota profiling and systems biology. Gut Pathogens will also consider, at the discretion of the editors, descriptive studies identifying a new genome sequence of a gut microbe or a series of related microbes (such as those obtained from new hosts, niches, settings, outbreaks and epidemics) and those obtained from single or multiple hosts at one or different time points (chronological evolution).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信