不同受体模型在配体结合强度和位置上的差异:针对蜱传脑炎病毒的计算药物筛选。

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Felicitas Finke, Jonathan Hungerland, Ilia A. Solov’yov, Fabian Schuhmann
{"title":"不同受体模型在配体结合强度和位置上的差异:针对蜱传脑炎病毒的计算药物筛选。","authors":"Felicitas Finke,&nbsp;Jonathan Hungerland,&nbsp;Ilia A. Solov’yov,&nbsp;Fabian Schuhmann","doi":"10.1007/s11030-024-10850-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBE) is a neurotrophic disease that has spread more rapidly throughout Europe and Asia in the past few years. At the same time, no cure or specific therapy is known to battle the illness apart from vaccination. To find a pharmacologically relevant drug, a computer-aided drug screening was initiated. Such a procedure probes a possible binding of a drug to the RNA Polymerase of TBE. The crystal structure of the receptor, however, includes missing and partially modeled regions, which rendered the structure incomplete and of questionable use for a thorough drug screening procedure. The quality of the receptor model was addressed by studying three putative structures created. We show that the choice of receptor models greatly influences the binding affinity of potential drug molecules and that the binding location could also be significantly impacted. We demonstrate that some drug candidates are unsuitable for one model but show decent results for another. Without any prejudice on the three employed receptor models, the study reveals the imperative need to investigate the receptor structure before drug binding is probed whether experimentally or computationally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":708,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Diversity","volume":"29 1","pages":"281 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different receptor models show differences in ligand binding strength and location: a computational drug screening for the tick-borne encephalitis virus\",\"authors\":\"Felicitas Finke,&nbsp;Jonathan Hungerland,&nbsp;Ilia A. Solov’yov,&nbsp;Fabian Schuhmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11030-024-10850-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBE) is a neurotrophic disease that has spread more rapidly throughout Europe and Asia in the past few years. At the same time, no cure or specific therapy is known to battle the illness apart from vaccination. To find a pharmacologically relevant drug, a computer-aided drug screening was initiated. Such a procedure probes a possible binding of a drug to the RNA Polymerase of TBE. The crystal structure of the receptor, however, includes missing and partially modeled regions, which rendered the structure incomplete and of questionable use for a thorough drug screening procedure. The quality of the receptor model was addressed by studying three putative structures created. We show that the choice of receptor models greatly influences the binding affinity of potential drug molecules and that the binding location could also be significantly impacted. We demonstrate that some drug candidates are unsuitable for one model but show decent results for another. Without any prejudice on the three employed receptor models, the study reveals the imperative need to investigate the receptor structure before drug binding is probed whether experimentally or computationally.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Diversity\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"281 - 292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785706/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Diversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11030-024-10850-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11030-024-10850-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蜱传脑炎病毒(TBE)是一种神经营养性疾病,在过去几年中以更快的速度在欧洲和亚洲蔓延。与此同时,除了接种疫苗之外,目前还没有治疗该疾病的特效药物。为了找到与药理相关的药物,计算机辅助药物筛选程序应运而生。这种程序可探测药物与 TBE 的 RNA 聚合酶的可能结合。然而,该受体的晶体结构包括缺失和部分建模区域,这使得结构不完整,对于彻底的药物筛选程序来说,其使用价值值得怀疑。通过研究创建的三个推定结构,我们解决了受体模型的质量问题。我们发现,受体模型的选择在很大程度上影响着潜在药物分子的结合亲和力,而且结合位置也会受到很大影响。我们证明,有些候选药物不适合某种模型,但在另一种模型中却显示出良好的效果。在不对所使用的三种受体模型有任何偏见的情况下,这项研究揭示了在通过实验或计算探究药物结合之前研究受体结构的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Different receptor models show differences in ligand binding strength and location: a computational drug screening for the tick-borne encephalitis virus

Different receptor models show differences in ligand binding strength and location: a computational drug screening for the tick-borne encephalitis virus

The tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBE) is a neurotrophic disease that has spread more rapidly throughout Europe and Asia in the past few years. At the same time, no cure or specific therapy is known to battle the illness apart from vaccination. To find a pharmacologically relevant drug, a computer-aided drug screening was initiated. Such a procedure probes a possible binding of a drug to the RNA Polymerase of TBE. The crystal structure of the receptor, however, includes missing and partially modeled regions, which rendered the structure incomplete and of questionable use for a thorough drug screening procedure. The quality of the receptor model was addressed by studying three putative structures created. We show that the choice of receptor models greatly influences the binding affinity of potential drug molecules and that the binding location could also be significantly impacted. We demonstrate that some drug candidates are unsuitable for one model but show decent results for another. Without any prejudice on the three employed receptor models, the study reveals the imperative need to investigate the receptor structure before drug binding is probed whether experimentally or computationally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Diversity
Molecular Diversity 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
219
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Diversity is a new publication forum for the rapid publication of refereed papers dedicated to describing the development, application and theory of molecular diversity and combinatorial chemistry in basic and applied research and drug discovery. The journal publishes both short and full papers, perspectives, news and reviews dealing with all aspects of the generation of molecular diversity, application of diversity for screening against alternative targets of all types (biological, biophysical, technological), analysis of results obtained and their application in various scientific disciplines/approaches including: combinatorial chemistry and parallel synthesis; small molecule libraries; microwave synthesis; flow synthesis; fluorous synthesis; diversity oriented synthesis (DOS); nanoreactors; click chemistry; multiplex technologies; fragment- and ligand-based design; structure/function/SAR; computational chemistry and molecular design; chemoinformatics; screening techniques and screening interfaces; analytical and purification methods; robotics, automation and miniaturization; targeted libraries; display libraries; peptides and peptoids; proteins; oligonucleotides; carbohydrates; natural diversity; new methods of library formulation and deconvolution; directed evolution, origin of life and recombination; search techniques, landscapes, random chemistry and more;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信