{"title":"基于人工智能的工具,对 CT 图像进行自动分割和测量,帮助准确快速地诊断急性胰腺炎。","authors":"Xuhang Pan, Kaijian Jiao, Xinyu Li, Linshuang Feng, Yige Tian, Lei Wu, Peng Zhang, Kejun Wang, Suping Chen, Bo Yang, Wen Chen","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) tool with automated pancreas segmentation and measurement of pancreatic morphological information on CT images to assist improved and faster diagnosis in acute pancreatitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively contained 1124 patients suspected for AP and received non-contrast and enhanced abdominal CT examination between September 2013 and September 2022. Patients were divided into training (N = 688), validation (N = 145), testing dataset [N = 291; N = 104 for normal pancreas, N = 98 for AP, N = 89 for AP complicated with PDAC (AP&PDAC)]. A model based on convolutional neural network (MSAnet) was developed. The pancreas segmentation and measurement were performed via eight open-source models and MSAnet based tools, and the efficacy was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU). The DSC and IoU for patients with different ages were also compared. The outline of tumour and oedema in the AP and were segmented by clustering. The diagnostic efficacy for radiologists with or without the assistance of MSAnet tool in AP and AP&PDAC was evaluated using receiver operation curve and confusion matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all models, MSAnet based tool showed best performance on the training and validation dataset, and had high efficacy on testing dataset. The performance was age-affected. With assistance of the AI tool, the diagnosis time was significantly shortened by 26.8% and 32.7% for junior and senior radiologists, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) in diagnosis of AP was improved from 0.91 to 0.96 for junior radiologist and 0.98 to 0.99 for senior radiologist. In AP&PDAC diagnosis, AUC was increased from 0.85 to 0.92 for junior and 0.97 to 0.99 for senior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MSAnet based tools showed good pancreas segmentation and measurement performance, which help radiologists improve diagnosis efficacy and workflow in both AP and AP with PDAC conditions.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study developed an AI tool with automated pancreas segmentation and measurement and provided evidence for AI tool assistance in improving the workflow and accuracy of AP diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1268-1277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-based tools with automated segmentation and measurement on CT images to assist accurate and fast diagnosis in acute pancreatitis.\",\"authors\":\"Xuhang Pan, Kaijian Jiao, Xinyu Li, Linshuang Feng, Yige Tian, Lei Wu, Peng Zhang, Kejun Wang, Suping Chen, Bo Yang, Wen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqae091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) tool with automated pancreas segmentation and measurement of pancreatic morphological information on CT images to assist improved and faster diagnosis in acute pancreatitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively contained 1124 patients suspected for AP and received non-contrast and enhanced abdominal CT examination between September 2013 and September 2022. Patients were divided into training (N = 688), validation (N = 145), testing dataset [N = 291; N = 104 for normal pancreas, N = 98 for AP, N = 89 for AP complicated with PDAC (AP&PDAC)]. A model based on convolutional neural network (MSAnet) was developed. The pancreas segmentation and measurement were performed via eight open-source models and MSAnet based tools, and the efficacy was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU). The DSC and IoU for patients with different ages were also compared. The outline of tumour and oedema in the AP and were segmented by clustering. The diagnostic efficacy for radiologists with or without the assistance of MSAnet tool in AP and AP&PDAC was evaluated using receiver operation curve and confusion matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all models, MSAnet based tool showed best performance on the training and validation dataset, and had high efficacy on testing dataset. The performance was age-affected. With assistance of the AI tool, the diagnosis time was significantly shortened by 26.8% and 32.7% for junior and senior radiologists, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) in diagnosis of AP was improved from 0.91 to 0.96 for junior radiologist and 0.98 to 0.99 for senior radiologist. In AP&PDAC diagnosis, AUC was increased from 0.85 to 0.92 for junior and 0.97 to 0.99 for senior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MSAnet based tools showed good pancreas segmentation and measurement performance, which help radiologists improve diagnosis efficacy and workflow in both AP and AP with PDAC conditions.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study developed an AI tool with automated pancreas segmentation and measurement and provided evidence for AI tool assistance in improving the workflow and accuracy of AP diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1268-1277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186564/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae091\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:开发一种人工智能(AI)工具,在CT图像上自动分割胰腺并测量胰腺形态学信息,以帮助改进和加快急性胰腺炎的诊断:本研究回顾性纳入了2013年9月至2022年9月期间接受非对比和增强腹部CT检查的1124例疑似急性胰腺炎患者。患者被分为训练数据集(N = 688)、验证数据集(N = 145)和测试数据集(N = 291,正常胰腺N = 104,AP N = 98,AP并发PDAC(AP&PDAC)N = 89)。开发了一个基于卷积神经网络(MSAnet)的模型。通过八个开源模型和基于 MSAnet 的工具进行了胰腺分割和测量,并使用 Dice 相似性系数(DSC)和交集大于联合(IoU)对疗效进行了评估。同时还比较了不同年龄患者的 DSC 和 IoU。通过聚类对 AP 中的肿瘤和水肿轮廓进行分割。使用接收者运算曲线和混淆矩阵评估了放射科医生在有 MSAnet 工具辅助或没有 MSAnet 工具辅助的情况下对 AP 和 AP&PDAC 的诊断效果:在所有模型中,基于 MSAnet 的工具在训练和验证数据集上表现最佳,在测试数据集上具有很高的功效。其性能受年龄影响。在人工智能工具的帮助下,初级和高级放射科医生的诊断时间分别缩短了 26.8% 和 32.7%。初级放射科医生诊断 AP 的曲线下面积从 0.91 提高到 0.96,高级放射科医生从 0.98 提高到 0.99。在 AP&PDAC 诊断中,初级放射医师的曲线下面积从 0.85 增加到 0.92,高级放射医师的曲线下面积从 0.97 增加到 0.99:结论:基于 MSAnet 的工具显示出良好的胰腺分割和测量性能,有助于放射科医生提高 AP 和 AP 合并 PDAC 的诊断效率和工作流程:本研究开发了一种可自动进行胰腺分割和测量的人工智能工具,为人工智能工具协助改善 AP 诊断的工作流程和准确性提供了证据。
Artificial intelligence-based tools with automated segmentation and measurement on CT images to assist accurate and fast diagnosis in acute pancreatitis.
Objectives: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) tool with automated pancreas segmentation and measurement of pancreatic morphological information on CT images to assist improved and faster diagnosis in acute pancreatitis.
Methods: This study retrospectively contained 1124 patients suspected for AP and received non-contrast and enhanced abdominal CT examination between September 2013 and September 2022. Patients were divided into training (N = 688), validation (N = 145), testing dataset [N = 291; N = 104 for normal pancreas, N = 98 for AP, N = 89 for AP complicated with PDAC (AP&PDAC)]. A model based on convolutional neural network (MSAnet) was developed. The pancreas segmentation and measurement were performed via eight open-source models and MSAnet based tools, and the efficacy was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU). The DSC and IoU for patients with different ages were also compared. The outline of tumour and oedema in the AP and were segmented by clustering. The diagnostic efficacy for radiologists with or without the assistance of MSAnet tool in AP and AP&PDAC was evaluated using receiver operation curve and confusion matrix.
Results: Among all models, MSAnet based tool showed best performance on the training and validation dataset, and had high efficacy on testing dataset. The performance was age-affected. With assistance of the AI tool, the diagnosis time was significantly shortened by 26.8% and 32.7% for junior and senior radiologists, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) in diagnosis of AP was improved from 0.91 to 0.96 for junior radiologist and 0.98 to 0.99 for senior radiologist. In AP&PDAC diagnosis, AUC was increased from 0.85 to 0.92 for junior and 0.97 to 0.99 for senior.
Conclusion: MSAnet based tools showed good pancreas segmentation and measurement performance, which help radiologists improve diagnosis efficacy and workflow in both AP and AP with PDAC conditions.
Advances in knowledge: This study developed an AI tool with automated pancreas segmentation and measurement and provided evidence for AI tool assistance in improving the workflow and accuracy of AP diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option