利用 PODRIX 和 TriG 接收器测量确定哨兵-6 迈克尔-弗赖利希的精确轨道

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Alex Conrad, Penina Axelrad, Shailen Desai, Bruce Haines
{"title":"利用 PODRIX 和 TriG 接收器测量确定哨兵-6 迈克尔-弗赖利希的精确轨道","authors":"Alex Conrad, Penina Axelrad, Shailen Desai, Bruce Haines","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01842-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich altimetry mission flies two GNSS receivers: a primary multi-GNSS (GPS plus Galileo) PODRIX receiver and a GPS-only TriG receiver. Each of these receivers is independently capable of supporting the precise orbit determination (POD) requirement for &lt; 1.5 cm radial rms error. In this study, we characterize the performance of single-receiver solutions and evaluate the benefits of a combined TriG and PODRIX orbit solution. The availability of both sets of receiver observations revealed a 10 mm in-track difference between orbit solutions derived independently from TriG and PODRIX tracking data. Based on satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals, this bias has been isolated to an apparent inconsistency between the estimated TriG receiver clock and observation time-tags of approximately 1.3 <span>\\(\\mu \\hbox {s}\\)</span>, which is equivalent to a common range error of roughly 400 m in the TriG observations. After applying this calibration, the TriG and PODRIX displayed similar performance in terms of orbit overlap precision. PODRIX-Galileo observations showed lower code and phase tracking residual rms values compared to the GPS observations. Overall, processing the calibrated TriG and PODRIX observations separately results in highly accurate orbit solutions with radial orbit accuracies better than 1 cm rms as indicated by one-way SLR residual rms of 7.2 mm or better for each solution. Orbit solution accuracy is slightly improved by processing both TriG and PODRIX observations together, resulting in one-way SLR residual rms of 7.0 mm.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich precise orbit determination using PODRIX and TriG receiver measurements\",\"authors\":\"Alex Conrad, Penina Axelrad, Shailen Desai, Bruce Haines\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00190-024-01842-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich altimetry mission flies two GNSS receivers: a primary multi-GNSS (GPS plus Galileo) PODRIX receiver and a GPS-only TriG receiver. Each of these receivers is independently capable of supporting the precise orbit determination (POD) requirement for &lt; 1.5 cm radial rms error. In this study, we characterize the performance of single-receiver solutions and evaluate the benefits of a combined TriG and PODRIX orbit solution. The availability of both sets of receiver observations revealed a 10 mm in-track difference between orbit solutions derived independently from TriG and PODRIX tracking data. Based on satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals, this bias has been isolated to an apparent inconsistency between the estimated TriG receiver clock and observation time-tags of approximately 1.3 <span>\\\\(\\\\mu \\\\hbox {s}\\\\)</span>, which is equivalent to a common range error of roughly 400 m in the TriG observations. After applying this calibration, the TriG and PODRIX displayed similar performance in terms of orbit overlap precision. PODRIX-Galileo observations showed lower code and phase tracking residual rms values compared to the GPS observations. Overall, processing the calibrated TriG and PODRIX observations separately results in highly accurate orbit solutions with radial orbit accuracies better than 1 cm rms as indicated by one-way SLR residual rms of 7.2 mm or better for each solution. Orbit solution accuracy is slightly improved by processing both TriG and PODRIX observations together, resulting in one-way SLR residual rms of 7.0 mm.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01842-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01842-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哨兵-6 迈克尔-弗赖利希测高飞行任务搭载了两台全球导航卫星系统接收机:一台主要的多全球导航卫星系统(全球定位系统加伽利略)PODRIX 接收机和一台仅用于全球定位系统的 TriG 接收机。每个接收器都能独立支持精确轨道测定(POD)要求的 1.5 厘米径向均方根误差。在这项研究中,我们分析了单个接收器解决方案的性能特点,并评估了 TriG 和 PODRIX 组合轨道解决方案的优势。两套接收机观测数据的可用性表明,根据 TriG 和 PODRIX 跟踪数据独立得出的轨道解决方案之间存在 10 毫米的轨道内差异。根据卫星激光测距(SLR)残差,这一偏差被隔离为TriG接收机时钟估计值与观测时间标签之间约1.3(\mu \hbox {s}\)的明显不一致,这相当于TriG观测中约400米的常见范围误差。应用这一校准后,TriG 和 PODRIX 在轨道重叠精度方面表现出相似的性能。与 GPS 观测结果相比,PODRIX-伽利略观测结果显示出较低的代码和相位跟踪残差均方根值。总体而言,对经过校准的TriG和PODRIX观测数据分别进行处理,可得到高精度的轨道解,径向轨道精度均方根值优于1厘米,每个解的单向SLR残差均方根值为7.2毫米或更高。通过同时处理 TriG 和 PODRIX 观测数据,轨道解算精度略有提高,单向 SLR 残差为 7.0 毫米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich precise orbit determination using PODRIX and TriG receiver measurements

Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich precise orbit determination using PODRIX and TriG receiver measurements

The Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich altimetry mission flies two GNSS receivers: a primary multi-GNSS (GPS plus Galileo) PODRIX receiver and a GPS-only TriG receiver. Each of these receivers is independently capable of supporting the precise orbit determination (POD) requirement for < 1.5 cm radial rms error. In this study, we characterize the performance of single-receiver solutions and evaluate the benefits of a combined TriG and PODRIX orbit solution. The availability of both sets of receiver observations revealed a 10 mm in-track difference between orbit solutions derived independently from TriG and PODRIX tracking data. Based on satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals, this bias has been isolated to an apparent inconsistency between the estimated TriG receiver clock and observation time-tags of approximately 1.3 \(\mu \hbox {s}\), which is equivalent to a common range error of roughly 400 m in the TriG observations. After applying this calibration, the TriG and PODRIX displayed similar performance in terms of orbit overlap precision. PODRIX-Galileo observations showed lower code and phase tracking residual rms values compared to the GPS observations. Overall, processing the calibrated TriG and PODRIX observations separately results in highly accurate orbit solutions with radial orbit accuracies better than 1 cm rms as indicated by one-way SLR residual rms of 7.2 mm or better for each solution. Orbit solution accuracy is slightly improved by processing both TriG and PODRIX observations together, resulting in one-way SLR residual rms of 7.0 mm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信