盲目订票:对乘客购买决策、航空公司盈利能力和旅游目的地的影响

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Juana M. Alonso, M. Pilar Socorro
{"title":"盲目订票:对乘客购买决策、航空公司盈利能力和旅游目的地的影响","authors":"Juana M. Alonso,&nbsp;M. Pilar Socorro","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Blind booking consists of selling cheap surprise trips with a set of possible destinations, but without revealing the real destination until the payment is made. In this paper, we develop an economic model to analyse the social and private optimality of this pricing strategy in the airline industry. We perceive opaque products as a pricing strategy managed directly by airlines (without intermediaries) and simultaneously applied with other pricing strategies. Blind booking allows airlines to sell all their seats while maximising revenues and charging different prices in two parallel and independent markets: the transparent and the opaque market. Considering consumers’ risk attitude, airlines must optimally choose the number of seats of each destination to be sold in each market in order to maximise their profits and create an attractive blind product. Our findings suggest that, in general, selling tickets in both markets is optimal for airlines. We show that, even when it is not optimal, it may enhance social welfare. Thus, policymakers, especially those of low-demanded destinations, should encourage airlines to introduce blind tickets. In these destinations, blind tickets imply an additional source of demand, attracting new customers and generating positive economic impacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101444"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000398/pdfft?md5=fd6583ca27f6d65bd81f507595dfa288&pid=1-s2.0-S0739885924000398-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blind booking: The effects on passengers' purchase decision, airlines’ profitability, and tourist destinations\",\"authors\":\"Juana M. Alonso,&nbsp;M. Pilar Socorro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Blind booking consists of selling cheap surprise trips with a set of possible destinations, but without revealing the real destination until the payment is made. In this paper, we develop an economic model to analyse the social and private optimality of this pricing strategy in the airline industry. We perceive opaque products as a pricing strategy managed directly by airlines (without intermediaries) and simultaneously applied with other pricing strategies. Blind booking allows airlines to sell all their seats while maximising revenues and charging different prices in two parallel and independent markets: the transparent and the opaque market. Considering consumers’ risk attitude, airlines must optimally choose the number of seats of each destination to be sold in each market in order to maximise their profits and create an attractive blind product. Our findings suggest that, in general, selling tickets in both markets is optimal for airlines. We show that, even when it is not optimal, it may enhance social welfare. Thus, policymakers, especially those of low-demanded destinations, should encourage airlines to introduce blind tickets. In these destinations, blind tickets imply an additional source of demand, attracting new customers and generating positive economic impacts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000398/pdfft?md5=fd6583ca27f6d65bd81f507595dfa288&pid=1-s2.0-S0739885924000398-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000398\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

盲订是指出售一组可能目的地的廉价惊喜旅行,但在付款之前不透露真正的目的地。在本文中,我们建立了一个经济模型来分析航空业这种定价策略的社会和私人最优性。我们将不透明产品视为一种由航空公司直接管理(无中间商)并与其他定价策略同时应用的定价策略。盲目订票允许航空公司在最大化收益的同时出售所有座位,并在两个平行且独立的市场(透明市场和不透明市场)上收取不同的价格。考虑到消费者的风险态度,航空公司必须最优化地选择在每个市场上出售的每个目的地的座位数量,以实现利润最大化并创造出有吸引力的盲订产品。我们的研究结果表明,一般来说,在两个市场上销售机票对航空公司来说都是最优选择。我们的研究结果表明,即使不是最优选择,也可能会提高社会福利。因此,政策制定者,尤其是低需求目的地的政策制定者,应鼓励航空公司推出盲机票。在这些目的地,盲目机票意味着额外的需求来源,可以吸引新客户并产生积极的经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blind booking: The effects on passengers' purchase decision, airlines’ profitability, and tourist destinations

Blind booking consists of selling cheap surprise trips with a set of possible destinations, but without revealing the real destination until the payment is made. In this paper, we develop an economic model to analyse the social and private optimality of this pricing strategy in the airline industry. We perceive opaque products as a pricing strategy managed directly by airlines (without intermediaries) and simultaneously applied with other pricing strategies. Blind booking allows airlines to sell all their seats while maximising revenues and charging different prices in two parallel and independent markets: the transparent and the opaque market. Considering consumers’ risk attitude, airlines must optimally choose the number of seats of each destination to be sold in each market in order to maximise their profits and create an attractive blind product. Our findings suggest that, in general, selling tickets in both markets is optimal for airlines. We show that, even when it is not optimal, it may enhance social welfare. Thus, policymakers, especially those of low-demanded destinations, should encourage airlines to introduce blind tickets. In these destinations, blind tickets imply an additional source of demand, attracting new customers and generating positive economic impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信