如何处理偶然发现的矢状缝融合:改良德尔菲研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-05-10 Print Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.2.PEDS23521
Sarah N Chiang, Jocelyn Reckford, Allyson L Alexander, Craig B Birgfeld, Christopher M Bonfield, Daniel E Couture, Lisa R David, Brooke French, Barbu Gociman, Jesse A Goldstein, Michael S Golinko, John R W Kestle, Amy Lee, Suresh N Magge, Ian F Pollack, S Alex Rottgers, Christopher M Runyan, Matthew D Smyth, C Corbett Wilkinson, Gary B Skolnick, Jennifer M Strahle, Kamlesh B Patel
{"title":"如何处理偶然发现的矢状缝融合:改良德尔菲研究。","authors":"Sarah N Chiang, Jocelyn Reckford, Allyson L Alexander, Craig B Birgfeld, Christopher M Bonfield, Daniel E Couture, Lisa R David, Brooke French, Barbu Gociman, Jesse A Goldstein, Michael S Golinko, John R W Kestle, Amy Lee, Suresh N Magge, Ian F Pollack, S Alex Rottgers, Christopher M Runyan, Matthew D Smyth, C Corbett Wilkinson, Gary B Skolnick, Jennifer M Strahle, Kamlesh B Patel","doi":"10.3171/2024.2.PEDS23521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As many as 5% of normocephalic children may have a prematurely fused sagittal suture, yet the clinical significance and best course of management of this finding remain unclear. Providers in the Synostosis Research Group were surveyed to create a multicenter consensus on an optimal treatment and monitoring algorithm for this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A four-round modified Delphi method was utilized. The first two rounds consisted of anonymous surveys distributed to 10 neurosurgeons and 9 plastic surgeons with expertise in craniosynostosis across 9 institutions, and presented 3 patients (aged 3 years, 2 years, and 2 months) with incidentally discovered fused sagittal sutures, normal cephalic indices, and no parietal dysmorphology. Surgeons were queried about their preferred term for this entity and how best to manage these patients. Results were synthesized to create a treatment algorithm. The third and fourth feedback rounds consisted of open discussion of the algorithm until no further concerns arose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most surgeons preferred the term \"premature fusion of the sagittal suture\" (93%). At the conclusion of the final round, all surgeons agreed to not operate on the 3- and 2-year-old patients unless symptoms of intracranial hypertension or papilledema were present. In contrast, 50% preferred to operate on the 2-month-old. However, all agreed to utilize shared decision-making, taking into account any concerns about future head shape and neurodevelopment. Panelists agreed that patients over 18 months of age without signs or symptoms suggesting elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) should not undergo surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through the Delphi method, a consensus regarding management of premature fusion of the sagittal suture was obtained from a panel of North American craniofacial surgeons. Without signs or symptoms of ICP elevation, surgery is not recommended in patients over 18 months of age. However, for children younger than 18 months, surgery should be discussed with caregivers using a shared decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What to do with an incidental finding of a fused sagittal suture: a modified Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah N Chiang, Jocelyn Reckford, Allyson L Alexander, Craig B Birgfeld, Christopher M Bonfield, Daniel E Couture, Lisa R David, Brooke French, Barbu Gociman, Jesse A Goldstein, Michael S Golinko, John R W Kestle, Amy Lee, Suresh N Magge, Ian F Pollack, S Alex Rottgers, Christopher M Runyan, Matthew D Smyth, C Corbett Wilkinson, Gary B Skolnick, Jennifer M Strahle, Kamlesh B Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.2.PEDS23521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As many as 5% of normocephalic children may have a prematurely fused sagittal suture, yet the clinical significance and best course of management of this finding remain unclear. Providers in the Synostosis Research Group were surveyed to create a multicenter consensus on an optimal treatment and monitoring algorithm for this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A four-round modified Delphi method was utilized. The first two rounds consisted of anonymous surveys distributed to 10 neurosurgeons and 9 plastic surgeons with expertise in craniosynostosis across 9 institutions, and presented 3 patients (aged 3 years, 2 years, and 2 months) with incidentally discovered fused sagittal sutures, normal cephalic indices, and no parietal dysmorphology. Surgeons were queried about their preferred term for this entity and how best to manage these patients. Results were synthesized to create a treatment algorithm. The third and fourth feedback rounds consisted of open discussion of the algorithm until no further concerns arose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most surgeons preferred the term \\\"premature fusion of the sagittal suture\\\" (93%). At the conclusion of the final round, all surgeons agreed to not operate on the 3- and 2-year-old patients unless symptoms of intracranial hypertension or papilledema were present. In contrast, 50% preferred to operate on the 2-month-old. However, all agreed to utilize shared decision-making, taking into account any concerns about future head shape and neurodevelopment. Panelists agreed that patients over 18 months of age without signs or symptoms suggesting elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) should not undergo surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through the Delphi method, a consensus regarding management of premature fusion of the sagittal suture was obtained from a panel of North American craniofacial surgeons. Without signs or symptoms of ICP elevation, surgery is not recommended in patients over 18 months of age. However, for children younger than 18 months, surgery should be discussed with caregivers using a shared decision-making process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.2.PEDS23521\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.2.PEDS23521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多达 5% 的正常颅儿童可能有过早融合的矢状缝,但这一发现的临床意义和最佳治疗方案仍不明确。为了就这种情况的最佳治疗和监测算法达成多中心共识,我们对脊柱侧凸研究小组(Synostosis Research Group)的医疗人员进行了调查:方法:采用了四轮改良德尔菲法。前两轮调查由匿名调查组成,调查对象是9家机构中10名神经外科医生和9名整形外科医生,他们都具有颅脑发育异常方面的专业知识,调查对象是3名患者(年龄分别为3岁、2岁和2个月),他们都是偶然发现矢状缝融合、头颅指数正常且没有顶骨畸形。我们询问了外科医生对这种实体的首选术语,以及如何最好地处理这些患者。结果经综合后形成了一套治疗算法。第三轮和第四轮反馈包括对算法的公开讨论,直到不再出现其他问题为止:大多数外科医生倾向于使用 "矢状缝过早融合 "这一术语(93%)。在最后一轮讨论结束时,所有外科医生都同意,除非出现颅内高压或乳头水肿症状,否则不对 3 岁和 2 岁患者进行手术。相比之下,50%的外科医生倾向于为 2 个月大的患者进行手术。不过,所有人都同意共同决策,并考虑到对未来头型和神经发育的任何担忧。专家小组成员一致认为,18 个月以上的患者如果没有提示颅内压(ICP)升高的体征或症状,不应接受手术治疗:通过德尔菲法,北美颅面外科医生小组就矢状缝过早融合的处理达成了共识。如果没有 ICP 升高的体征或症状,不建议对 18 个月以上的患者进行手术治疗。但是,对于小于 18 个月的患儿,应通过共同决策过程与看护人讨论手术事宜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What to do with an incidental finding of a fused sagittal suture: a modified Delphi study.

Objective: As many as 5% of normocephalic children may have a prematurely fused sagittal suture, yet the clinical significance and best course of management of this finding remain unclear. Providers in the Synostosis Research Group were surveyed to create a multicenter consensus on an optimal treatment and monitoring algorithm for this condition.

Methods: A four-round modified Delphi method was utilized. The first two rounds consisted of anonymous surveys distributed to 10 neurosurgeons and 9 plastic surgeons with expertise in craniosynostosis across 9 institutions, and presented 3 patients (aged 3 years, 2 years, and 2 months) with incidentally discovered fused sagittal sutures, normal cephalic indices, and no parietal dysmorphology. Surgeons were queried about their preferred term for this entity and how best to manage these patients. Results were synthesized to create a treatment algorithm. The third and fourth feedback rounds consisted of open discussion of the algorithm until no further concerns arose.

Results: Most surgeons preferred the term "premature fusion of the sagittal suture" (93%). At the conclusion of the final round, all surgeons agreed to not operate on the 3- and 2-year-old patients unless symptoms of intracranial hypertension or papilledema were present. In contrast, 50% preferred to operate on the 2-month-old. However, all agreed to utilize shared decision-making, taking into account any concerns about future head shape and neurodevelopment. Panelists agreed that patients over 18 months of age without signs or symptoms suggesting elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) should not undergo surgical treatment.

Conclusions: Through the Delphi method, a consensus regarding management of premature fusion of the sagittal suture was obtained from a panel of North American craniofacial surgeons. Without signs or symptoms of ICP elevation, surgery is not recommended in patients over 18 months of age. However, for children younger than 18 months, surgery should be discussed with caregivers using a shared decision-making process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信