我如何治疗镰状细胞病中的疑难输血病例?

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI:10.1182/blood.2023023648
Stella T Chou, Jeanne E Hendrickson
{"title":"我如何治疗镰状细胞病中的疑难输血病例?","authors":"Stella T Chou, Jeanne E Hendrickson","doi":"10.1182/blood.2023023648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) can be lifesaving for individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, alloimmunization after transfusion is more common with patients with SCD than in other patient populations, resulting in morbidity and mortality. Management of complications related to RBC alloantibodies, including delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTRs) and identifying compatible RBCs for future transfusions, remains a challenge for hematologists and transfusion medicine providers. Although transfusion guidelines from organizations, including the American Society for Hematology provide general recommendations, individual cases remain challenging. Antibody evanescence and the lack of widespread RBC alloantibody data sharing across hospitals pose unique challenges, as do RH variants in both transfusion recipients and blood donors. Further, as potentially curative therapies require RBC transfusions to lower the hemoglobin S before cellular therapy collections and infusions, patients who are highly alloimmunized may be deemed ineligible. The cases described are representative of clinical dilemmas the authors have encountered, and the approaches are as evidence-based as the literature and the authors' experiences allow. A future desired state is one in which RBC alloantibody data are efficiently shared across institutions, Rh alloimmunization can be mitigated, better treatments exist for DHTRs, and a label of difficult to transfuse does not prevent desired therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":"2257-2265"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How I treat challenging transfusion cases in sickle cell disease.\",\"authors\":\"Stella T Chou, Jeanne E Hendrickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/blood.2023023648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) can be lifesaving for individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, alloimmunization after transfusion is more common with patients with SCD than in other patient populations, resulting in morbidity and mortality. Management of complications related to RBC alloantibodies, including delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTRs) and identifying compatible RBCs for future transfusions, remains a challenge for hematologists and transfusion medicine providers. Although transfusion guidelines from organizations, including the American Society for Hematology provide general recommendations, individual cases remain challenging. Antibody evanescence and the lack of widespread RBC alloantibody data sharing across hospitals pose unique challenges, as do RH variants in both transfusion recipients and blood donors. Further, as potentially curative therapies require RBC transfusions to lower the hemoglobin S before cellular therapy collections and infusions, patients who are highly alloimmunized may be deemed ineligible. The cases described are representative of clinical dilemmas the authors have encountered, and the approaches are as evidence-based as the literature and the authors' experiences allow. A future desired state is one in which RBC alloantibody data are efficiently shared across institutions, Rh alloimmunization can be mitigated, better treatments exist for DHTRs, and a label of difficult to transfuse does not prevent desired therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2257-2265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2023023648\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2023023648","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

输注红细胞(RBC)可以挽救镰状细胞病(SCD)患者的生命。然而,与其他患者相比,SCD 患者在输血后更容易发生同种异体免疫,从而导致发病和死亡。处理与红细胞异体抗体相关的并发症,包括延迟溶血性输血反应(DHTR)和为未来输血确定相容的红细胞,仍然是血液病医生和输血医疗提供者面临的一项挑战。尽管美国血液学会等组织的输血指南提供了一般性建议,但个别病例仍具有挑战性。抗体衰减和医院间缺乏广泛的红细胞同种抗体数据共享带来了独特的挑战,输血者和献血者的 RH 变异也是如此。此外,由于潜在的治愈性疗法需要在细胞疗法采集和输注前输注红细胞以降低血红蛋白 S,因此高度异体免疫患者可能被认为不符合条件。所描述的病例都是作者遇到的具有代表性的临床难题,所采用的方法都是以文献和作者的经验为依据的。未来的理想状态是:RBC 同种抗体数据在各机构间有效共享,Rh 同种免疫可以减轻,DHTR 有更好的治疗方法,"难以输血 "的标签不会妨碍理想的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How I treat challenging transfusion cases in sickle cell disease.

Abstract: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) can be lifesaving for individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, alloimmunization after transfusion is more common with patients with SCD than in other patient populations, resulting in morbidity and mortality. Management of complications related to RBC alloantibodies, including delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTRs) and identifying compatible RBCs for future transfusions, remains a challenge for hematologists and transfusion medicine providers. Although transfusion guidelines from organizations, including the American Society for Hematology provide general recommendations, individual cases remain challenging. Antibody evanescence and the lack of widespread RBC alloantibody data sharing across hospitals pose unique challenges, as do RH variants in both transfusion recipients and blood donors. Further, as potentially curative therapies require RBC transfusions to lower the hemoglobin S before cellular therapy collections and infusions, patients who are highly alloimmunized may be deemed ineligible. The cases described are representative of clinical dilemmas the authors have encountered, and the approaches are as evidence-based as the literature and the authors' experiences allow. A future desired state is one in which RBC alloantibody data are efficiently shared across institutions, Rh alloimmunization can be mitigated, better treatments exist for DHTRs, and a label of difficult to transfuse does not prevent desired therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood
Blood 医学-血液学
CiteScore
23.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
955
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Blood, the official journal of the American Society of Hematology, published online and in print, provides an international forum for the publication of original articles describing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. Primary research articles will be published under the following scientific categories: Clinical Trials and Observations; Gene Therapy; Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells; Immunobiology and Immunotherapy scope; Myeloid Neoplasia; Lymphoid Neoplasia; Phagocytes, Granulocytes and Myelopoiesis; Platelets and Thrombopoiesis; Red Cells, Iron and Erythropoiesis; Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Transfusion Medicine; Transplantation; and Vascular Biology. Papers can be listed under more than one category as appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信