通过机器学习量化超声心动图显示的肺动脉反流率

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1007/s00246-024-03511-y
Jennifer Cohen, Son Q Duong, Naveen Arivazhagan, David M Barris, Surkhay Bebiya, Rosalie Castaldo, Marjorie Gayanilo, Kali Hopkins, Maya Kailas, Grace Kong, Xiye Ma, Molly Marshall, Erin A Paul, Melanie Tan, Jen Lie Yau, Girish N Nadkarni, David Ezon
{"title":"通过机器学习量化超声心动图显示的肺动脉反流率","authors":"Jennifer Cohen, Son Q Duong, Naveen Arivazhagan, David M Barris, Surkhay Bebiya, Rosalie Castaldo, Marjorie Gayanilo, Kali Hopkins, Maya Kailas, Grace Kong, Xiye Ma, Molly Marshall, Erin A Paul, Melanie Tan, Jen Lie Yau, Girish N Nadkarni, David Ezon","doi":"10.1007/s00246-024-03511-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessment of pulmonary regurgitation (PR) guides treatment for patients with congenital heart disease. Quantitative assessment of PR fraction (PRF) by echocardiography is limited. Cardiac MRI (cMRI) is the reference-standard for PRF quantification. We created an algorithm to predict cMRI-quantified PRF from echocardiography using machine learning (ML). We retrospectively performed echocardiographic measurements paired to cMRI within 3 months in patients with ≥ mild PR from 2009 to 2022. Model inputs were vena contracta ratio, PR index, PR pressure half-time, main and branch pulmonary artery diastolic flow reversal (BPAFR), and transannular patch repair. A gradient boosted trees ML algorithm was trained using k-fold cross-validation to predict cMRI PRF by phase contrast imaging as a continuous number and at > mild (PRF ≥ 20%) and severe (PRF ≥ 40%) thresholds. Regression performance was evaluated with mean absolute error (MAE), and at clinical thresholds with area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC). Prediction accuracy was compared to historical clinician accuracy. We externally validated prior reported studies for comparison. We included 243 subjects (median age 21 years, 58% repaired tetralogy of Fallot). The regression MAE = 7.0%. For prediction of > mild PR, AUROC = 0.96, but BPAFR alone outperformed the ML model (sensitivity 94%, specificity 97%). The ML model detection of severe PR had AUROC = 0.86, but in the subgroup with BPAFR, performance dropped (AUROC = 0.73). Accuracy between clinicians and the ML model was similar (70% vs. 69%). There was decrement in performance of prior reported algorithms on external validation in our dataset. A novel ML model for echocardiographic quantification of PRF outperforms prior studies and has comparable overall accuracy to clinicians. BPAFR is an excellent marker for > mild PRF, and has moderate capacity to detect severe PR, but more work is required to distinguish moderate from severe PR. Poor external validation of prior works highlights reproducibility challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"884-894"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Quantification of Pulmonary Regurgitation Fraction from Echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Cohen, Son Q Duong, Naveen Arivazhagan, David M Barris, Surkhay Bebiya, Rosalie Castaldo, Marjorie Gayanilo, Kali Hopkins, Maya Kailas, Grace Kong, Xiye Ma, Molly Marshall, Erin A Paul, Melanie Tan, Jen Lie Yau, Girish N Nadkarni, David Ezon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00246-024-03511-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessment of pulmonary regurgitation (PR) guides treatment for patients with congenital heart disease. Quantitative assessment of PR fraction (PRF) by echocardiography is limited. Cardiac MRI (cMRI) is the reference-standard for PRF quantification. We created an algorithm to predict cMRI-quantified PRF from echocardiography using machine learning (ML). We retrospectively performed echocardiographic measurements paired to cMRI within 3 months in patients with ≥ mild PR from 2009 to 2022. Model inputs were vena contracta ratio, PR index, PR pressure half-time, main and branch pulmonary artery diastolic flow reversal (BPAFR), and transannular patch repair. A gradient boosted trees ML algorithm was trained using k-fold cross-validation to predict cMRI PRF by phase contrast imaging as a continuous number and at > mild (PRF ≥ 20%) and severe (PRF ≥ 40%) thresholds. Regression performance was evaluated with mean absolute error (MAE), and at clinical thresholds with area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC). Prediction accuracy was compared to historical clinician accuracy. We externally validated prior reported studies for comparison. We included 243 subjects (median age 21 years, 58% repaired tetralogy of Fallot). The regression MAE = 7.0%. For prediction of > mild PR, AUROC = 0.96, but BPAFR alone outperformed the ML model (sensitivity 94%, specificity 97%). The ML model detection of severe PR had AUROC = 0.86, but in the subgroup with BPAFR, performance dropped (AUROC = 0.73). Accuracy between clinicians and the ML model was similar (70% vs. 69%). There was decrement in performance of prior reported algorithms on external validation in our dataset. A novel ML model for echocardiographic quantification of PRF outperforms prior studies and has comparable overall accuracy to clinicians. BPAFR is an excellent marker for > mild PRF, and has moderate capacity to detect severe PR, but more work is required to distinguish moderate from severe PR. Poor external validation of prior works highlights reproducibility challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"884-894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03511-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03511-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺动脉反流(PR)的评估可为先天性心脏病患者的治疗提供指导。超声心动图对肺动脉瓣反流分数(PRF)的定量评估有限。心脏磁共振成像(cMRI)是 PRF 定量的参考标准。我们创建了一种算法,利用机器学习(ML)从超声心动图预测 cMRI 定量的 PRF。我们回顾性地对 2009 年至 2022 年期间 3 个月内≥轻度 PR 患者进行了与 cMRI 配对的超声心动图测量。模型输入为静脉收缩比、PR 指数、PR 压力半衰期、主肺动脉和支肺动脉舒张期血流反向(BPAFR)以及经肺动脉补片修复。使用 k 倍交叉验证对梯度增强树 ML 算法进行了训练,以预测相位对比成像 cMRI PRF 的连续数字和 > 轻度(PRF ≥ 20%)和重度(PRF ≥ 40%)阈值。回归性能用平均绝对误差 (MAE) 进行评估,临床阈值用接收器操作特征曲线下面积 (AUROC) 进行评估。预测准确性与临床医生的历史准确性进行了比较。我们对之前报告的研究进行了外部验证,以进行比较。我们纳入了 243 名受试者(中位年龄 21 岁,58% 修复过法洛氏四联症)。回归 MAE = 7.0%。对于 > 轻度 PR 的预测,AUROC = 0.96,但单用 BPAFR 的效果优于 ML 模型(灵敏度 94%,特异性 97%)。ML 模型检测重度 PR 的 AUROC = 0.86,但在有 BPAFR 的亚组中,性能下降(AUROC = 0.73)。临床医生和 ML 模型的准确率相似(70% 对 69%)。在我们的数据集中,之前报道的算法在外部验证中的性能有所下降。用于超声心动图量化 PRF 的新型 ML 模型优于之前的研究,其总体准确性与临床医生相当。BPAFR 是检测 > 轻度 PRF 的极佳标记物,在检测重度 PR 方面也有一定的能力,但要区分中度和重度 PR 还需要做更多的工作。先前研究的外部验证结果不佳,凸显了可重复性方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine Learning Quantification of Pulmonary Regurgitation Fraction from Echocardiography.

Machine Learning Quantification of Pulmonary Regurgitation Fraction from Echocardiography.

Assessment of pulmonary regurgitation (PR) guides treatment for patients with congenital heart disease. Quantitative assessment of PR fraction (PRF) by echocardiography is limited. Cardiac MRI (cMRI) is the reference-standard for PRF quantification. We created an algorithm to predict cMRI-quantified PRF from echocardiography using machine learning (ML). We retrospectively performed echocardiographic measurements paired to cMRI within 3 months in patients with ≥ mild PR from 2009 to 2022. Model inputs were vena contracta ratio, PR index, PR pressure half-time, main and branch pulmonary artery diastolic flow reversal (BPAFR), and transannular patch repair. A gradient boosted trees ML algorithm was trained using k-fold cross-validation to predict cMRI PRF by phase contrast imaging as a continuous number and at > mild (PRF ≥ 20%) and severe (PRF ≥ 40%) thresholds. Regression performance was evaluated with mean absolute error (MAE), and at clinical thresholds with area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC). Prediction accuracy was compared to historical clinician accuracy. We externally validated prior reported studies for comparison. We included 243 subjects (median age 21 years, 58% repaired tetralogy of Fallot). The regression MAE = 7.0%. For prediction of > mild PR, AUROC = 0.96, but BPAFR alone outperformed the ML model (sensitivity 94%, specificity 97%). The ML model detection of severe PR had AUROC = 0.86, but in the subgroup with BPAFR, performance dropped (AUROC = 0.73). Accuracy between clinicians and the ML model was similar (70% vs. 69%). There was decrement in performance of prior reported algorithms on external validation in our dataset. A novel ML model for echocardiographic quantification of PRF outperforms prior studies and has comparable overall accuracy to clinicians. BPAFR is an excellent marker for > mild PRF, and has moderate capacity to detect severe PR, but more work is required to distinguish moderate from severe PR. Poor external validation of prior works highlights reproducibility challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信