Samira Hamiditehrani, Darren M. Scott, Matthias N. Sweet
{"title":"设计 \"加拿大未来交通调查\"(FMCS),以评估加拿大城市不断变化的交通状况,重点是自动驾驶汽车","authors":"Samira Hamiditehrani, Darren M. Scott, Matthias N. Sweet","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10484-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The mobility tool landscape continues to evolve because of shared mobility services, the prospect of automated vehicles (AVs), teleworking, and unpredicted challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical that public and private sector actors understand how travel behavior changes due to these catalysts. A nationwide Canadian survey, called the Future Mobility in Canada Survey (FMCS), was designed to capture the complex decision-making processes of travel behavior changes and the adoption of new mobility tools by assessing individual preferences, affective motivations, and behavioral intentions. FMCS investigated four main areas: (1) respondents’ intentions to adopt AVs, (2) respondents’ use of shared forms of mobility services, (3) respondents’ recent experience with telework and their preferences towards it, and (4) respondents’ behavior across the COVID-19 pandemic for certain modes and telework. FMCS addressed these four areas by collecting responses from 5002 respondents between October and November 2021, across the five largest Canadian census metropolitan areas in terms of population (Toronto, Montréal, Vancouver, Ottawa-Gatineau, and Calgary) and Hamilton, which ranked 9th largest in 2021. This paper presents an overview of FMCS, emphasizing novel aspects of the survey design and data collection process reporting response burden and rates, while the major focus of this paper is scrutinizing the steps taken to obtain respondents’ intentions to adopt various types of AVs including shared AVs, pooled AVs, private AVs, and automated shuttle buses. The insights are relevant for other survey-based studies and are applicable for researchers who investigate adoption of new mobility tools and consequent travel behavior changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"153 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of the “Future Mobility in Canada Survey” (FMCS) to assess the evolving mobility landscape in urban Canada with an emphasis on automated vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Samira Hamiditehrani, Darren M. Scott, Matthias N. Sweet\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-024-10484-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The mobility tool landscape continues to evolve because of shared mobility services, the prospect of automated vehicles (AVs), teleworking, and unpredicted challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical that public and private sector actors understand how travel behavior changes due to these catalysts. A nationwide Canadian survey, called the Future Mobility in Canada Survey (FMCS), was designed to capture the complex decision-making processes of travel behavior changes and the adoption of new mobility tools by assessing individual preferences, affective motivations, and behavioral intentions. FMCS investigated four main areas: (1) respondents’ intentions to adopt AVs, (2) respondents’ use of shared forms of mobility services, (3) respondents’ recent experience with telework and their preferences towards it, and (4) respondents’ behavior across the COVID-19 pandemic for certain modes and telework. FMCS addressed these four areas by collecting responses from 5002 respondents between October and November 2021, across the five largest Canadian census metropolitan areas in terms of population (Toronto, Montréal, Vancouver, Ottawa-Gatineau, and Calgary) and Hamilton, which ranked 9th largest in 2021. This paper presents an overview of FMCS, emphasizing novel aspects of the survey design and data collection process reporting response burden and rates, while the major focus of this paper is scrutinizing the steps taken to obtain respondents’ intentions to adopt various types of AVs including shared AVs, pooled AVs, private AVs, and automated shuttle buses. The insights are relevant for other survey-based studies and are applicable for researchers who investigate adoption of new mobility tools and consequent travel behavior changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"153 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10484-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10484-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Design of the “Future Mobility in Canada Survey” (FMCS) to assess the evolving mobility landscape in urban Canada with an emphasis on automated vehicles
The mobility tool landscape continues to evolve because of shared mobility services, the prospect of automated vehicles (AVs), teleworking, and unpredicted challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical that public and private sector actors understand how travel behavior changes due to these catalysts. A nationwide Canadian survey, called the Future Mobility in Canada Survey (FMCS), was designed to capture the complex decision-making processes of travel behavior changes and the adoption of new mobility tools by assessing individual preferences, affective motivations, and behavioral intentions. FMCS investigated four main areas: (1) respondents’ intentions to adopt AVs, (2) respondents’ use of shared forms of mobility services, (3) respondents’ recent experience with telework and their preferences towards it, and (4) respondents’ behavior across the COVID-19 pandemic for certain modes and telework. FMCS addressed these four areas by collecting responses from 5002 respondents between October and November 2021, across the five largest Canadian census metropolitan areas in terms of population (Toronto, Montréal, Vancouver, Ottawa-Gatineau, and Calgary) and Hamilton, which ranked 9th largest in 2021. This paper presents an overview of FMCS, emphasizing novel aspects of the survey design and data collection process reporting response burden and rates, while the major focus of this paper is scrutinizing the steps taken to obtain respondents’ intentions to adopt various types of AVs including shared AVs, pooled AVs, private AVs, and automated shuttle buses. The insights are relevant for other survey-based studies and are applicable for researchers who investigate adoption of new mobility tools and consequent travel behavior changes.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.