O. Ferrer , E. Roca , M.G. Rowan , J.A. Muñoz , K.A. Giles , O. Gratacós
{"title":"由垂直堆积和横向移动的堆积中心驱动的半动力大塌陷的变形、演化和控制作用","authors":"O. Ferrer , E. Roca , M.G. Rowan , J.A. Muñoz , K.A. Giles , O. Gratacós","doi":"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Megaflaps comprise steeply dipping to overturned panels of the oldest suprasalt strata flanking steep diapirs, and represent the roofs of early inflated salt. These large-scale structures result from salt-sediment interaction at minibasin scales and entail multiple kilometres of folding and vertical relief. They are divided into two end-member types (halokinetic and contractional) and form by some combination of limb rotation and kink-band migration. They can be difficult to image and interpret adjacent to flaring diapirs and beneath allochthonous salt due to steep bedding dips and suboptimal illumination.</p><p>Using physical models, we investigate halokinetic megaflaps driven by differential loading. Models with vertically-stacked vs. laterally-shifting loading above a prekinematic layer have been run to determine the main processes and mechanisms controlling the growth and kinematic evolution of megaflaps. Parameters such as the thickness of the prekinematic cover, the width of the proto-salt wall, the synkinematic sedimentation rate, and variations in the mechanical properties of the prekinematic cover have been tested to evaluate their role in megaflap generation. The experimental results demonstrate that in absence of tectonic forces, halokinetic megaflaps are generated by a combination of 1) an early increase of pressure-head gradient between two adjacent minibasins with different rates of sedimentation and subsidence, and 2) the disappearance of this gradient that occurs when welding occurs beneath the more quickly subsiding minibasin. The geometry, kinematic evolution, and degree of small-scale deformation of the megaflaps in our analogue models are consistent with both exposed (e.g., Paradox Basin) and seismically imaged halokinetic megaflaps (e.g., deepwater northern Gulf of Mexico).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Geology","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124001019/pdfft?md5=9a82c7aa13c497a65edb7e9a85fbaa7a&pid=1-s2.0-S0191814124001019-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deformation, evolution and controls of halokinetic megaflaps driven by vertically-stacked and laterally-shifting depocenters\",\"authors\":\"O. Ferrer , E. Roca , M.G. Rowan , J.A. Muñoz , K.A. Giles , O. Gratacós\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Megaflaps comprise steeply dipping to overturned panels of the oldest suprasalt strata flanking steep diapirs, and represent the roofs of early inflated salt. These large-scale structures result from salt-sediment interaction at minibasin scales and entail multiple kilometres of folding and vertical relief. They are divided into two end-member types (halokinetic and contractional) and form by some combination of limb rotation and kink-band migration. They can be difficult to image and interpret adjacent to flaring diapirs and beneath allochthonous salt due to steep bedding dips and suboptimal illumination.</p><p>Using physical models, we investigate halokinetic megaflaps driven by differential loading. Models with vertically-stacked vs. laterally-shifting loading above a prekinematic layer have been run to determine the main processes and mechanisms controlling the growth and kinematic evolution of megaflaps. Parameters such as the thickness of the prekinematic cover, the width of the proto-salt wall, the synkinematic sedimentation rate, and variations in the mechanical properties of the prekinematic cover have been tested to evaluate their role in megaflap generation. The experimental results demonstrate that in absence of tectonic forces, halokinetic megaflaps are generated by a combination of 1) an early increase of pressure-head gradient between two adjacent minibasins with different rates of sedimentation and subsidence, and 2) the disappearance of this gradient that occurs when welding occurs beneath the more quickly subsiding minibasin. The geometry, kinematic evolution, and degree of small-scale deformation of the megaflaps in our analogue models are consistent with both exposed (e.g., Paradox Basin) and seismically imaged halokinetic megaflaps (e.g., deepwater northern Gulf of Mexico).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structural Geology\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124001019/pdfft?md5=9a82c7aa13c497a65edb7e9a85fbaa7a&pid=1-s2.0-S0191814124001019-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structural Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124001019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124001019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deformation, evolution and controls of halokinetic megaflaps driven by vertically-stacked and laterally-shifting depocenters
Megaflaps comprise steeply dipping to overturned panels of the oldest suprasalt strata flanking steep diapirs, and represent the roofs of early inflated salt. These large-scale structures result from salt-sediment interaction at minibasin scales and entail multiple kilometres of folding and vertical relief. They are divided into two end-member types (halokinetic and contractional) and form by some combination of limb rotation and kink-band migration. They can be difficult to image and interpret adjacent to flaring diapirs and beneath allochthonous salt due to steep bedding dips and suboptimal illumination.
Using physical models, we investigate halokinetic megaflaps driven by differential loading. Models with vertically-stacked vs. laterally-shifting loading above a prekinematic layer have been run to determine the main processes and mechanisms controlling the growth and kinematic evolution of megaflaps. Parameters such as the thickness of the prekinematic cover, the width of the proto-salt wall, the synkinematic sedimentation rate, and variations in the mechanical properties of the prekinematic cover have been tested to evaluate their role in megaflap generation. The experimental results demonstrate that in absence of tectonic forces, halokinetic megaflaps are generated by a combination of 1) an early increase of pressure-head gradient between two adjacent minibasins with different rates of sedimentation and subsidence, and 2) the disappearance of this gradient that occurs when welding occurs beneath the more quickly subsiding minibasin. The geometry, kinematic evolution, and degree of small-scale deformation of the megaflaps in our analogue models are consistent with both exposed (e.g., Paradox Basin) and seismically imaged halokinetic megaflaps (e.g., deepwater northern Gulf of Mexico).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Structural Geology publishes process-oriented investigations about structural geology using appropriate combinations of analog and digital field data, seismic reflection data, satellite-derived data, geometric analysis, kinematic analysis, laboratory experiments, computer visualizations, and analogue or numerical modelling on all scales. Contributions are encouraged to draw perspectives from rheology, rock mechanics, geophysics,metamorphism, sedimentology, petroleum geology, economic geology, geodynamics, planetary geology, tectonics and neotectonics to provide a more powerful understanding of deformation processes and systems. Given the visual nature of the discipline, supplementary materials that portray the data and analysis in 3-D or quasi 3-D manners, including the use of videos, and/or graphical abstracts can significantly strengthen the impact of contributions.