高年级护理专业学生的模拟前准备偏好:虚拟仿真游戏与传统案例研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Marian Luctkar-Flude RN, PhD, CCSNE, FCNEI , Jane Tyerman RN, PhD, CCSNE , Monica Larocque RN, MN, NP
{"title":"高年级护理专业学生的模拟前准备偏好:虚拟仿真游戏与传统案例研究","authors":"Marian Luctkar-Flude RN, PhD, CCSNE, FCNEI ,&nbsp;Jane Tyerman RN, PhD, CCSNE ,&nbsp;Monica Larocque RN, MN, NP","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Presimulation preparation is critical to prepare learners to participate fully in clinical simulations; however, many do not complete assigned presimulation activities.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Which presimulation preparation activities will senior nursing students choose and perceive as helpful?</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A quasi-experimental study evaluated senior nursing student (n = 115) pre-simulation preparation preferences. Students had access to eight activities including a case study and a virtual simulation game (VSG). Participants indicated which activities they completed, and rated the case study and VSG in terms of usability, engagement, and impact on learning.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 57% of participants completed the paper-based case study and 37% played the VSG. Participation in any preparation resulted in significant improvements in competence (t = 2.3; <em>p</em> = .02). Learners rated VSG higher than case study in terms of usability (t = 2.6; <em>p</em> = .01), engagement (t = 2.8; <em>p</em> = .01) and impact on learning (t = 2.4; <em>p</em> = .02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results revealed nursing students have different preferences for pre-simulation preparation. Although more students completed the case study than the VSG, those who played the game rated it higher. This supports providing a choice in presimulation preparation activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000379/pdfft?md5=61fd2380334aa946700a26525342b1b1&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000379-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-simulation Preparation Preferences of Senior Nursing Students: Virtual Simulation Games Versus Traditional Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"Marian Luctkar-Flude RN, PhD, CCSNE, FCNEI ,&nbsp;Jane Tyerman RN, PhD, CCSNE ,&nbsp;Monica Larocque RN, MN, NP\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Presimulation preparation is critical to prepare learners to participate fully in clinical simulations; however, many do not complete assigned presimulation activities.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Which presimulation preparation activities will senior nursing students choose and perceive as helpful?</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A quasi-experimental study evaluated senior nursing student (n = 115) pre-simulation preparation preferences. Students had access to eight activities including a case study and a virtual simulation game (VSG). Participants indicated which activities they completed, and rated the case study and VSG in terms of usability, engagement, and impact on learning.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 57% of participants completed the paper-based case study and 37% played the VSG. Participation in any preparation resulted in significant improvements in competence (t = 2.3; <em>p</em> = .02). Learners rated VSG higher than case study in terms of usability (t = 2.6; <em>p</em> = .01), engagement (t = 2.8; <em>p</em> = .01) and impact on learning (t = 2.4; <em>p</em> = .02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results revealed nursing students have different preferences for pre-simulation preparation. Although more students completed the case study than the VSG, those who played the game rated it higher. This supports providing a choice in presimulation preparation activities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000379/pdfft?md5=61fd2380334aa946700a26525342b1b1&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000379-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000379\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题高年级护理专业学生会选择哪些模拟前准备活动,并认为这些活动有帮助?方法一项准实验研究评估了高年级护理专业学生(n = 115)的模拟前准备偏好。学生们可以参加八项活动,包括案例研究和虚拟模拟游戏(VSG)。结果总的来说,57% 的参与者完成了纸质案例研究,37% 的参与者玩了虚拟仿真游戏。参与任何准备工作都会显著提高能力(t = 2.3; p = .02)。在可用性(t = 2.6;p = .01)、参与度(t = 2.8;p = .01)和对学习的影响(t = 2.4;p = .02)方面,学员对 VSG 的评价高于案例研究。虽然完成案例研究的学生多于 VSG,但玩游戏的学生对案例研究的评价更高。这支持在模拟前准备活动中提供选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-simulation Preparation Preferences of Senior Nursing Students: Virtual Simulation Games Versus Traditional Case Studies

Background

Presimulation preparation is critical to prepare learners to participate fully in clinical simulations; however, many do not complete assigned presimulation activities.

Research Question

Which presimulation preparation activities will senior nursing students choose and perceive as helpful?

Methods

A quasi-experimental study evaluated senior nursing student (n = 115) pre-simulation preparation preferences. Students had access to eight activities including a case study and a virtual simulation game (VSG). Participants indicated which activities they completed, and rated the case study and VSG in terms of usability, engagement, and impact on learning.

Results

Overall, 57% of participants completed the paper-based case study and 37% played the VSG. Participation in any preparation resulted in significant improvements in competence (t = 2.3; p = .02). Learners rated VSG higher than case study in terms of usability (t = 2.6; p = .01), engagement (t = 2.8; p = .01) and impact on learning (t = 2.4; p = .02).

Conclusion

Results revealed nursing students have different preferences for pre-simulation preparation. Although more students completed the case study than the VSG, those who played the game rated it higher. This supports providing a choice in presimulation preparation activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信