宗教信仰对焦虑症病程和症状的影响(9 年跟踪调查

Q3 Psychology
Johan H. Bos , Cis Vrijmoeth , Johanna H.M. Hovenkamp-Hermelink , Hanneke Schaap – Jonker
{"title":"宗教信仰对焦虑症病程和症状的影响(9 年跟踪调查","authors":"Johan H. Bos ,&nbsp;Cis Vrijmoeth ,&nbsp;Johanna H.M. Hovenkamp-Hermelink ,&nbsp;Hanneke Schaap – Jonker","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Religion can be an important aspect in life for people and may therefore be important to consider in anxiety disorders. However, there has been limited research into the longitudinal relationship between religiousness and the prevalence of anxiety disorders or anxiety severity and no such research up to date looking at specific anxiety disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We made use of data from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), a large clinical cohort study, including 2981 participants at baseline. Based on religious affiliation, commitment to affiliation and religious attendance at baseline as demographic variables, three groups (non-affiliated; affiliated, low commitment/attendance; affiliated, higher commitment/attendance) were compared regarding the prevalence of specific anxiety disorders and anxiety severity at baseline and at two, four, six, and nine years follow-up. For the analyses, we used graphs and Linear Mixed Models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, no differences were found for the prevalence of specific anxiety disorders and of comorbidity between anxiety disorders or comorbidity with depressive disorders. Furthermore, results showed no differences between the groups regarding the anxiety severity over time.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The main limitations relate to the operationalization of religiousness based on demographic variables at baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>On a population level, being religiously affiliated with more or less commitment/attendance does not seem to protect against specific anxiety disorders or more anxiety symptoms, nor is it a risk factor. Further research should focus on more internal religious aspects, and more specifically on anxiety in specific groups of religious people or people with specific religion related anxiety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100797"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000830/pdfft?md5=afb589789ea0625448167fc6a146b908&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324000830-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of religion on the course of anxiety disorders and symptoms over 9-years follow-up\",\"authors\":\"Johan H. Bos ,&nbsp;Cis Vrijmoeth ,&nbsp;Johanna H.M. Hovenkamp-Hermelink ,&nbsp;Hanneke Schaap – Jonker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Religion can be an important aspect in life for people and may therefore be important to consider in anxiety disorders. However, there has been limited research into the longitudinal relationship between religiousness and the prevalence of anxiety disorders or anxiety severity and no such research up to date looking at specific anxiety disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We made use of data from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), a large clinical cohort study, including 2981 participants at baseline. Based on religious affiliation, commitment to affiliation and religious attendance at baseline as demographic variables, three groups (non-affiliated; affiliated, low commitment/attendance; affiliated, higher commitment/attendance) were compared regarding the prevalence of specific anxiety disorders and anxiety severity at baseline and at two, four, six, and nine years follow-up. For the analyses, we used graphs and Linear Mixed Models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, no differences were found for the prevalence of specific anxiety disorders and of comorbidity between anxiety disorders or comorbidity with depressive disorders. Furthermore, results showed no differences between the groups regarding the anxiety severity over time.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The main limitations relate to the operationalization of religiousness based on demographic variables at baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>On a population level, being religiously affiliated with more or less commitment/attendance does not seem to protect against specific anxiety disorders or more anxiety symptoms, nor is it a risk factor. Further research should focus on more internal religious aspects, and more specifically on anxiety in specific groups of religious people or people with specific religion related anxiety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100797\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000830/pdfft?md5=afb589789ea0625448167fc6a146b908&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324000830-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景宗教信仰可能是人们生活中的一个重要方面,因此可能是焦虑症的重要考虑因素。然而,有关宗教信仰与焦虑症患病率或焦虑症严重程度之间的纵向关系的研究十分有限,而且迄今为止还没有针对特定焦虑症的此类研究。方法我们利用了荷兰抑郁与焦虑研究(NESDA)的数据,该研究是一项大型临床队列研究,基线参与者有 2981 人。以基线时的宗教归属、对归属的承诺和宗教出席率为人口统计学变量,比较了三个组别(非归属组;归属组,低承诺/出席率组;归属组,高承诺/出席率组)在基线时和随访两年、四年、六年和九年时的特定焦虑症患病率和焦虑严重程度。结果总体而言,特定焦虑症的患病率、焦虑症之间的合并症或与抑郁症的合并症没有发现差异。此外,研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,各组之间的焦虑严重程度也没有差异。局限性主要局限性与基于基线人口统计学变量的宗教信仰操作有关。进一步的研究应更多地关注宗教的内部因素,更具体地说,应更多地关注特定宗教群体或与特定宗教相关的焦虑症患者的焦虑情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of religion on the course of anxiety disorders and symptoms over 9-years follow-up

Background

Religion can be an important aspect in life for people and may therefore be important to consider in anxiety disorders. However, there has been limited research into the longitudinal relationship between religiousness and the prevalence of anxiety disorders or anxiety severity and no such research up to date looking at specific anxiety disorders.

Methods

We made use of data from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), a large clinical cohort study, including 2981 participants at baseline. Based on religious affiliation, commitment to affiliation and religious attendance at baseline as demographic variables, three groups (non-affiliated; affiliated, low commitment/attendance; affiliated, higher commitment/attendance) were compared regarding the prevalence of specific anxiety disorders and anxiety severity at baseline and at two, four, six, and nine years follow-up. For the analyses, we used graphs and Linear Mixed Models.

Results

Overall, no differences were found for the prevalence of specific anxiety disorders and of comorbidity between anxiety disorders or comorbidity with depressive disorders. Furthermore, results showed no differences between the groups regarding the anxiety severity over time.

Limitations

The main limitations relate to the operationalization of religiousness based on demographic variables at baseline.

Conclusions

On a population level, being religiously affiliated with more or less commitment/attendance does not seem to protect against specific anxiety disorders or more anxiety symptoms, nor is it a risk factor. Further research should focus on more internal religious aspects, and more specifically on anxiety in specific groups of religious people or people with specific religion related anxiety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信