Total Transanal Endorectal Pull-through Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Approach in Children with Rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes between total transanal endorectal pull-through (TTEPT) and laparoscopic-assisted transanal endorectal pull-through (LTEPT) in children with rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's disease. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to compare patients with rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's disease who underwent TTEPT or LTEPT at Beijing Children's Hospital between January 2016 and June 2021. Clinical details were collected from medical records. Patients' parents completed the Krickenbeck questionnaire to evaluate the long-term bowel function (age >4 years) by telephone. A literature search was conducted by using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed database. We combined data from our data with eligible articles and performed a meta-analysis. Result: From our data, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications or long-term bowel function between the patients undergoing TTEPT and LTEPT. A meta-analysis, including five published articles and our data, was performed with a total of 414 patients (n = 236 with TTEPT and n = 178 with LTEPT). For postoperative complications, there were no significant differences between TTEPT and LTEPT for the incidence of HAEC (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.80; P = .77) or anastomotic leak (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 0.40-15.80; P = .32). Regarding bowel function outcomes, the incidence of soiling (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.84-3.71; P = .13) and constipation (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.54-2.64; P = .66) were also similar for the two approaches. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in postoperative complications and bowel functional outcomes in patients with rectosigmoid HD undergoing TTEPT or LTEPT. Levels of Evidence: III.