双胎妊娠计划剖宫产或阴道分娩后的母体和胎儿结局:两个三级分娩中心的比较。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Elisa Bevilacqua, Eleonora Torcia, Federica Meli, Juliette Josse, Giulia Bonanni, Camille Olivier, Federica Romanzi, Andrew Carlin, Alessandra Familiari, Jacques C Jani, Antonio Lanzone, Dominique A Badr
{"title":"双胎妊娠计划剖宫产或阴道分娩后的母体和胎儿结局:两个三级分娩中心的比较。","authors":"Elisa Bevilacqua, Eleonora Torcia, Federica Meli, Juliette Josse, Giulia Bonanni, Camille Olivier, Federica Romanzi, Andrew Carlin, Alessandra Familiari, Jacques C Jani, Antonio Lanzone, Dominique A Badr","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2350676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Twin pregnancy is associated with higher risks of adverse perinatal outcomes for both the mother and the babies. Among the many challenges in the follow-up of twin pregnancies, the mode of delivery is the last but not the least decision to be made, with the main influencing factors being amnionicity and fetal presentation. The aim of the study was to compare perinatal outcomes in two European centers using different protocols for twin birth in case of non-cephalic second twin; the Italian patients being delivered mainly by cesarean section with those in Belgium being routinely offered the choice of vaginal delivery (VD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a dual center international retrospective observational study. The population included 843 women with a twin pregnancy ≥ 32 weeks (dichorionic or monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies) and a known pregnancy outcome. The population was stratified according to chorionicity. Demographic and pregnancy data were reported per pregnancy, whereas neonatal outcomes were reported per fetus. We used multiple logistic regression models to adjust for possible confounding variables and to compute the adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) for each maternal or neonatal outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observed rate of cesarean delivery was significantly higher in the Italian cohort: 85% for dichorionic pregnancies and 94.4% for the monochorionic vs 45.2% and 54.4% respectively in the Belgian center (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001). We found that Belgian cohort showed significantly higher rates of NICU admission, respiratory distress at birth and Apgar score of < 7 after 5 min. Despite these differences, the composite severe adverse outcome was similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, neither the presentation of the second twin nor the chorionicity affected maternal and severe neonatal outcomes, regardless of the mode of delivery in two tertiary care centers, but VD was associated to a poorer short-term neonatal outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"2350676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and fetal outcomes after planned cesarean or vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy: a comparison between 2 third level birth centers.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Bevilacqua, Eleonora Torcia, Federica Meli, Juliette Josse, Giulia Bonanni, Camille Olivier, Federica Romanzi, Andrew Carlin, Alessandra Familiari, Jacques C Jani, Antonio Lanzone, Dominique A Badr\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2024.2350676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Twin pregnancy is associated with higher risks of adverse perinatal outcomes for both the mother and the babies. Among the many challenges in the follow-up of twin pregnancies, the mode of delivery is the last but not the least decision to be made, with the main influencing factors being amnionicity and fetal presentation. The aim of the study was to compare perinatal outcomes in two European centers using different protocols for twin birth in case of non-cephalic second twin; the Italian patients being delivered mainly by cesarean section with those in Belgium being routinely offered the choice of vaginal delivery (VD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a dual center international retrospective observational study. The population included 843 women with a twin pregnancy ≥ 32 weeks (dichorionic or monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies) and a known pregnancy outcome. The population was stratified according to chorionicity. Demographic and pregnancy data were reported per pregnancy, whereas neonatal outcomes were reported per fetus. We used multiple logistic regression models to adjust for possible confounding variables and to compute the adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) for each maternal or neonatal outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observed rate of cesarean delivery was significantly higher in the Italian cohort: 85% for dichorionic pregnancies and 94.4% for the monochorionic vs 45.2% and 54.4% respectively in the Belgian center (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001). We found that Belgian cohort showed significantly higher rates of NICU admission, respiratory distress at birth and Apgar score of < 7 after 5 min. Despite these differences, the composite severe adverse outcome was similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, neither the presentation of the second twin nor the chorionicity affected maternal and severe neonatal outcomes, regardless of the mode of delivery in two tertiary care centers, but VD was associated to a poorer short-term neonatal outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"2350676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2350676\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2350676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:双胎妊娠对母婴围产期不良结局的风险较高。在双胎妊娠随访的众多挑战中,分娩方式是最后但并非最不重要的决定,其主要影响因素是羊膜性和胎儿表现。这项研究的目的是比较两个欧洲中心在非头位第二双胎情况下采用不同方案进行双胎分娩的围产期结果;意大利患者主要采用剖宫产,而比利时患者则可常规选择阴道分娩(VD):这是一项双中心国际回顾性观察研究。研究对象包括双胎妊娠≥32周(二绒毛膜双胎或单绒毛膜双胎)且妊娠结果已知的843名妇女。研究对象根据绒毛膜性进行了分层。人口统计学和妊娠数据按妊娠报告,而新生儿结局按胎儿报告。我们使用多元逻辑回归模型来调整可能的混杂变量,并计算每个孕产妇或新生儿结局的调整后几率比(adjOR):在意大利队列中观察到的剖宫产率明显更高:二绒毛膜妊娠的剖宫产率为 85%,单绒毛膜妊娠的剖宫产率为 94.4%,而比利时中心的剖宫产率分别为 45.2%和 54.4%(P 值小于 0.001)。我们发现,比利时队列中新生儿重症监护室入院率、出生时呼吸窘迫率和 5 分钟后阿普加评分小于 7 分的比例明显更高。尽管存在这些差异,但两组的综合严重不良结局相似:在这项研究中,在两家三级医疗中心,无论分娩方式如何,第二双胎的出现和绒毛膜性都不会影响产妇和新生儿的严重结局,但VD与较差的新生儿短期结局有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maternal and fetal outcomes after planned cesarean or vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy: a comparison between 2 third level birth centers.

Background: Twin pregnancy is associated with higher risks of adverse perinatal outcomes for both the mother and the babies. Among the many challenges in the follow-up of twin pregnancies, the mode of delivery is the last but not the least decision to be made, with the main influencing factors being amnionicity and fetal presentation. The aim of the study was to compare perinatal outcomes in two European centers using different protocols for twin birth in case of non-cephalic second twin; the Italian patients being delivered mainly by cesarean section with those in Belgium being routinely offered the choice of vaginal delivery (VD).

Methods: This was a dual center international retrospective observational study. The population included 843 women with a twin pregnancy ≥ 32 weeks (dichorionic or monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies) and a known pregnancy outcome. The population was stratified according to chorionicity. Demographic and pregnancy data were reported per pregnancy, whereas neonatal outcomes were reported per fetus. We used multiple logistic regression models to adjust for possible confounding variables and to compute the adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) for each maternal or neonatal outcome.

Results: The observed rate of cesarean delivery was significantly higher in the Italian cohort: 85% for dichorionic pregnancies and 94.4% for the monochorionic vs 45.2% and 54.4% respectively in the Belgian center (p-value < 0.001). We found that Belgian cohort showed significantly higher rates of NICU admission, respiratory distress at birth and Apgar score of < 7 after 5 min. Despite these differences, the composite severe adverse outcome was similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: In this study, neither the presentation of the second twin nor the chorionicity affected maternal and severe neonatal outcomes, regardless of the mode of delivery in two tertiary care centers, but VD was associated to a poorer short-term neonatal outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信