按罗布森十组分类系统划分的死胎死亡率:对撒哈拉以南非洲 16 家医院 80 663 名新生儿的横断面登记。

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Claudia Hanson, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt, Maria Del Rosario Alsina, Muzdalifat Abeid, Hussein L. Kidanto, Helle Mölsted Alvesson, Andrea B. Pembe, Peter Waiswa, Jean-Paul Dossou, Effie Chipeta, Manuela Straneo, Lenka Benova, the ALERT team
{"title":"按罗布森十组分类系统划分的死胎死亡率:对撒哈拉以南非洲 16 家医院 80 663 名新生儿的横断面登记。","authors":"Claudia Hanson,&nbsp;Kristi Sidney Annerstedt,&nbsp;Maria Del Rosario Alsina,&nbsp;Muzdalifat Abeid,&nbsp;Hussein L. Kidanto,&nbsp;Helle Mölsted Alvesson,&nbsp;Andrea B. Pembe,&nbsp;Peter Waiswa,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Dossou,&nbsp;Effie Chipeta,&nbsp;Manuela Straneo,&nbsp;Lenka Benova,&nbsp;the ALERT team","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification and the usefulness of this approach for understanding trends.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data from 16 hospitals in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>All women aged 13–49 years who gave birth to a live or stillborn baby weighting &gt;1000 g between July 2021 and December 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compared stillbirth risk by Robson ten-group classification, and across countries, and calculated proportional contributions to mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Stillbirth mortality, defined as antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 80 663 babies born to 78 085 women; 3107 were stillborn. Stillbirth mortality by country were: 7.3% (Benin), 1.9% (Malawi), 1.6% (Tanzania) and 4.9% (Uganda). The largest contributor to stillbirths was Robson group 10 (preterm birth, 28.2%) followed by Robson group 3 (multipara with cephalic term singleton in spontaneous labour, 25.0%). The risk of dying was highest in births complicated by malpresentations, such as nullipara breech (11.0%), multipara breech (16.7%) and transverse/oblique lie (17.9%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings indicate that group 10 (preterm birth) and group 3 (multipara with cephalic term singleton in spontaneous labour) each contribute to a quarter of stillbirth mortality. High mortality risk was observed in births complicated by malpresentation, such as transverse lie or breech. The high mortality share of group 3 is unexpected, demanding case-by-case investigation. The high mortality rate observed for Robson groups 6–10 hints for a need to intensify actions to improve labour management, and the categorisation may support the regular review of labour progress.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":"131 11","pages":"1465-1474"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17833","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification system: A cross-sectional registry of 80 663 births from 16 hospital in sub-Saharan Africa\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Hanson,&nbsp;Kristi Sidney Annerstedt,&nbsp;Maria Del Rosario Alsina,&nbsp;Muzdalifat Abeid,&nbsp;Hussein L. Kidanto,&nbsp;Helle Mölsted Alvesson,&nbsp;Andrea B. Pembe,&nbsp;Peter Waiswa,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Dossou,&nbsp;Effie Chipeta,&nbsp;Manuela Straneo,&nbsp;Lenka Benova,&nbsp;the ALERT team\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.17833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification and the usefulness of this approach for understanding trends.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cross-sectional study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data from 16 hospitals in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population</h3>\\n \\n <p>All women aged 13–49 years who gave birth to a live or stillborn baby weighting &gt;1000 g between July 2021 and December 2022.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We compared stillbirth risk by Robson ten-group classification, and across countries, and calculated proportional contributions to mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stillbirth mortality, defined as antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 80 663 babies born to 78 085 women; 3107 were stillborn. Stillbirth mortality by country were: 7.3% (Benin), 1.9% (Malawi), 1.6% (Tanzania) and 4.9% (Uganda). The largest contributor to stillbirths was Robson group 10 (preterm birth, 28.2%) followed by Robson group 3 (multipara with cephalic term singleton in spontaneous labour, 25.0%). The risk of dying was highest in births complicated by malpresentations, such as nullipara breech (11.0%), multipara breech (16.7%) and transverse/oblique lie (17.9%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings indicate that group 10 (preterm birth) and group 3 (multipara with cephalic term singleton in spontaneous labour) each contribute to a quarter of stillbirth mortality. High mortality risk was observed in births complicated by malpresentation, such as transverse lie or breech. The high mortality share of group 3 is unexpected, demanding case-by-case investigation. The high mortality rate observed for Robson groups 6–10 hints for a need to intensify actions to improve labour management, and the categorisation may support the regular review of labour progress.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":4,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"volume\":\"131 11\",\"pages\":\"1465-1474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17833\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的按照罗布森十组分类法评估死胎死亡率,以及这种方法在了解趋势方面的作用:横断面研究:前瞻性收集贝宁、马拉维、坦桑尼亚和乌干达 16 家医院的围产期电子登记数据:所有年龄在 13-49 岁之间、在 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 12 月期间生育过体重大于 1000 克的活产或死产婴儿的女性:我们比较了罗布森十组分类和不同国家的死产风险,并计算了死亡率的比例:死产死亡率,定义为产前和产中死产:我们纳入了 78 085 名妇女所生的 80 663 个婴儿,其中 3107 个为死胎。死产死亡率按国家分列如下7.3%(贝宁)、1.9%(马拉维)、1.6%(坦桑尼亚)和 4.9%(乌干达)。造成死胎最多的是罗布森第 10 组(早产,28.2%),其次是罗布森第 3 组(多胎头足月单胎自然分娩,25.0%)。因胎位不正而难产的产妇死亡风险最高,如无子宫臀位(11.0%)、多胎妊娠臀位(16.7%)和横卧/斜卧(17.9%):我们的研究结果表明,第 10 组(早产)和第 3 组(多胎妊娠头足月单胎自然分娩)各占死胎死亡率的四分之一。因横卧位或臀位等胎位不正而难产的产妇死亡率较高。第 3 组的高死亡率出乎意料,需要进行个案调查。在罗布森 6-10 组中观察到的高死亡率表明,有必要加强行动以改善产程管理,这种分类可能有助于定期检查产程进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification system: A cross-sectional registry of 80 663 births from 16 hospital in sub-Saharan Africa

Stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification system: A cross-sectional registry of 80 663 births from 16 hospital in sub-Saharan Africa

Objective

To assess stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification and the usefulness of this approach for understanding trends.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data from 16 hospitals in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.

Population

All women aged 13–49 years who gave birth to a live or stillborn baby weighting >1000 g between July 2021 and December 2022.

Methods

We compared stillbirth risk by Robson ten-group classification, and across countries, and calculated proportional contributions to mortality.

Main outcome measures

Stillbirth mortality, defined as antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths.

Results

We included 80 663 babies born to 78 085 women; 3107 were stillborn. Stillbirth mortality by country were: 7.3% (Benin), 1.9% (Malawi), 1.6% (Tanzania) and 4.9% (Uganda). The largest contributor to stillbirths was Robson group 10 (preterm birth, 28.2%) followed by Robson group 3 (multipara with cephalic term singleton in spontaneous labour, 25.0%). The risk of dying was highest in births complicated by malpresentations, such as nullipara breech (11.0%), multipara breech (16.7%) and transverse/oblique lie (17.9%).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that group 10 (preterm birth) and group 3 (multipara with cephalic term singleton in spontaneous labour) each contribute to a quarter of stillbirth mortality. High mortality risk was observed in births complicated by malpresentation, such as transverse lie or breech. The high mortality share of group 3 is unexpected, demanding case-by-case investigation. The high mortality rate observed for Robson groups 6–10 hints for a need to intensify actions to improve labour management, and the categorisation may support the regular review of labour progress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信