健康监测中的隐私障碍:范围审查。

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.2196/53592
Luyi Sun, Bian Yang, Els Kindt, Jingyi Chu
{"title":"健康监测中的隐私障碍:范围审查。","authors":"Luyi Sun, Bian Yang, Els Kindt, Jingyi Chu","doi":"10.2196/53592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health monitoring technologies help patients and older adults live better and stay longer in their own homes. However, there are many factors influencing their adoption of these technologies. Privacy is one of them.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the privacy barriers in health monitoring from current research, analyze the factors that influence patients to adopt assisted living technologies, provide a social psychological explanation, and propose suggestions for mitigating these barriers in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, and web-based literature databases were searched for published studies to explore the available research on privacy barriers in a health monitoring environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 65 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected and analyzed. Contradictory findings and results were found in some of the included articles. We analyzed the contradictory findings and provided possible explanations for current barriers, such as demographic differences, information asymmetry, researchers' conceptual confusion, inducible experiment design and its psychological impacts on participants, researchers' confirmation bias, and a lack of distinction among different user roles. We found that few exploratory studies have been conducted so far to collect privacy-related legal norms in a health monitoring environment. Four research questions related to privacy barriers were raised, and an attempt was made to provide answers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the problems of some research, summarizes patients' privacy concerns and legal concerns from the studies conducted, and lists the factors that should be considered when gathering and analyzing people's privacy attitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"7 ","pages":"e53592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy Barriers in Health Monitoring: Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Luyi Sun, Bian Yang, Els Kindt, Jingyi Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/53592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health monitoring technologies help patients and older adults live better and stay longer in their own homes. However, there are many factors influencing their adoption of these technologies. Privacy is one of them.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the privacy barriers in health monitoring from current research, analyze the factors that influence patients to adopt assisted living technologies, provide a social psychological explanation, and propose suggestions for mitigating these barriers in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, and web-based literature databases were searched for published studies to explore the available research on privacy barriers in a health monitoring environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 65 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected and analyzed. Contradictory findings and results were found in some of the included articles. We analyzed the contradictory findings and provided possible explanations for current barriers, such as demographic differences, information asymmetry, researchers' conceptual confusion, inducible experiment design and its psychological impacts on participants, researchers' confirmation bias, and a lack of distinction among different user roles. We found that few exploratory studies have been conducted so far to collect privacy-related legal norms in a health monitoring environment. Four research questions related to privacy barriers were raised, and an attempt was made to provide answers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the problems of some research, summarizes patients' privacy concerns and legal concerns from the studies conducted, and lists the factors that should be considered when gathering and analyzing people's privacy attitudes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR nursing\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"e53592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117136/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/53592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康监测技术可以帮助病人和老年人在自己家中生活得更好,待得更久。然而,影响他们采用这些技术的因素有很多,隐私就是其中之一。隐私就是其中之一:本研究旨在从当前研究中概述健康监测中的隐私障碍,分析影响患者采用生活辅助技术的因素,提供社会心理学解释,并提出在未来研究中减少这些障碍的建议:方法:我们进行了一次范围界定审查,并在网络文献数据库中搜索了已发表的研究报告,以探索关于健康监护环境中隐私障碍的现有研究:结果:共有 65 篇文章符合纳入标准,并进行了筛选和分析。在部分纳入的文章中发现了相互矛盾的研究结果和结果。我们分析了这些相互矛盾的研究结果,并为当前的障碍提供了可能的解释,如人口统计学差异、信息不对称、研究人员的概念混淆、诱导性实验设计及其对参与者的心理影响、研究人员的确认偏差以及缺乏对不同用户角色的区分。我们发现,迄今为止,很少有探索性研究收集健康监测环境中与隐私相关的法律规范。我们提出了四个与隐私障碍相关的研究问题,并试图给出答案:本综述强调了一些研究中存在的问题,总结了已开展研究中患者对隐私问题和法律问题的关注,并列出了在收集和分析人们的隐私态度时应考虑的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Privacy Barriers in Health Monitoring: Scoping Review.

Background: Health monitoring technologies help patients and older adults live better and stay longer in their own homes. However, there are many factors influencing their adoption of these technologies. Privacy is one of them.

Objective: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the privacy barriers in health monitoring from current research, analyze the factors that influence patients to adopt assisted living technologies, provide a social psychological explanation, and propose suggestions for mitigating these barriers in future research.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted, and web-based literature databases were searched for published studies to explore the available research on privacy barriers in a health monitoring environment.

Results: In total, 65 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected and analyzed. Contradictory findings and results were found in some of the included articles. We analyzed the contradictory findings and provided possible explanations for current barriers, such as demographic differences, information asymmetry, researchers' conceptual confusion, inducible experiment design and its psychological impacts on participants, researchers' confirmation bias, and a lack of distinction among different user roles. We found that few exploratory studies have been conducted so far to collect privacy-related legal norms in a health monitoring environment. Four research questions related to privacy barriers were raised, and an attempt was made to provide answers.

Conclusions: This review highlights the problems of some research, summarizes patients' privacy concerns and legal concerns from the studies conducted, and lists the factors that should be considered when gathering and analyzing people's privacy attitudes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信