模型树脂和轴锥度对窄脊模型中添加式制造可拆卸模具的真实性和匹配性的影响。

Gülce Çakmak, Steven Cetin, Mustafa Borga Dönmez, Manrique Fonseca, Çiğdem Kahveci, Francisco X Azpiazu-Flores, Martin Schimmel, Burak Yilmaz
{"title":"模型树脂和轴锥度对窄脊模型中添加式制造可拆卸模具的真实性和匹配性的影响。","authors":"Gülce Çakmak, Steven Cetin, Mustafa Borga Dönmez, Manrique Fonseca, Çiğdem Kahveci, Francisco X Azpiazu-Flores, Martin Schimmel, Burak Yilmaz","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how model resin and shaft taper affect the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies in narrow ridge casts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A typodont model with a prepared mandibular molar was scanned to design virtual dies with different shaft tapers (0-degree [straight], 5-degree tapered, and 10-degree tapered). In total, 15 dies and one hollowed cast per taper were additively manufactured from two resins (G PRINT 3D Model [GP] and DentaMODEL [DM]). Dies and casts were digitized to evaluate their trueness (root mean square [RMS]). The fit of the dies was evaluated with crown portion's RMS when seated in the cast and with distance deviations. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze data (α =.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GP dies had lower overall, root, and base RMS, while DM dies had lower crown RMS (P ≤ .016). Straight dies had the highest overall, root, and base RMS within GP (P ≤ .030). The 10-degree dies had the lowest overall and base RMS, lower crown RMS than straight dies, and lower root RMS than 5-degree dies within DM (P ≤ .047). When the dies were seated, GP had lower crown portion RMS within 5- and 10 degree dies, and 5-degree dies had the highest RMS within DM (P ≤ .003). GP had smaller distance deviations within 5- and 10-degree dies. The 5-degree dies had the largest deviations within DM (P ≤ .049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GP dies mostly had higher trueness and better fit. Straight dies mostly had lower trueness within GP, and 10-degree taper mostly led to higher trueness within DM. The shaft taper affected the fit of DM dies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"247-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Model Resin and Shaft Taper on the Trueness and Fit of Additively Manufactured Removable Dies in Narrow Ridge Casts.\",\"authors\":\"Gülce Çakmak, Steven Cetin, Mustafa Borga Dönmez, Manrique Fonseca, Çiğdem Kahveci, Francisco X Azpiazu-Flores, Martin Schimmel, Burak Yilmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how model resin and shaft taper affect the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies in narrow ridge casts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A typodont model with a prepared mandibular molar was scanned to design virtual dies with different shaft tapers (0-degree [straight], 5-degree tapered, and 10-degree tapered). In total, 15 dies and one hollowed cast per taper were additively manufactured from two resins (G PRINT 3D Model [GP] and DentaMODEL [DM]). Dies and casts were digitized to evaluate their trueness (root mean square [RMS]). The fit of the dies was evaluated with crown portion's RMS when seated in the cast and with distance deviations. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze data (α =.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GP dies had lower overall, root, and base RMS, while DM dies had lower crown RMS (P ≤ .016). Straight dies had the highest overall, root, and base RMS within GP (P ≤ .030). The 10-degree dies had the lowest overall and base RMS, lower crown RMS than straight dies, and lower root RMS than 5-degree dies within DM (P ≤ .047). When the dies were seated, GP had lower crown portion RMS within 5- and 10 degree dies, and 5-degree dies had the highest RMS within DM (P ≤ .003). GP had smaller distance deviations within 5- and 10-degree dies. The 5-degree dies had the largest deviations within DM (P ≤ .049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GP dies mostly had higher trueness and better fit. Straight dies mostly had lower trueness within GP, and 10-degree taper mostly led to higher trueness within DM. The shaft taper affected the fit of DM dies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"247-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

模型树脂和轴锥角对窄脊铸件中快速成型可移动模具的真实性和匹配性的影响 目的:评估模型树脂和轴锥角如何影响窄脊铸件中快速成型可移动模具的真实性和匹配性。评估模型树脂和牙轴锥度如何影响加成法制造的可摘模在窄牙脊铸型中的真实度和密合度:扫描带有制备好的下颌臼齿的类型牙模型,以设计具有不同轴锥度(0 度(直)、5 度和 10 度锥度)的虚拟模具。使用两种树脂(G-PRINT 3D Model,GP 和 DentaMODEL,DM)对每个锥度的 15 个模具和一个空心铸模进行了加成制造。对模具和铸件进行了数字化处理,以评估其真实性(均方根)。根据牙冠部分在铸型中就位时的均方根和距离偏差来评估模具的密合度。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析数据(α =.05):GP模具的总有效值、根部有效值和基部有效值较低,而DM模具的冠部有效值较低(P≤.016)。在 GP 模具中,直模的总有效值、根部有效值和基部有效值最高(P≤.030)。在 DM 中,10 度模具的总有效值和基部有效值最低,冠部有效值低于直模,根部有效值低于 5 度模具(P≤.047)。当模具就位时,在5度和10度模具中,GP的冠部有效值较低,而在DM中,5度模具的有效值最高(P≤.003)。GP在5度和10度模具中的距离偏差较小。5度模具在DM内的偏差最大(P≤.049):结论:GP 模具大多具有更高的精度和更好的贴合度。在 GP 内,直模的真实度大多较低。10度锥度在DM内大多导致较高的精度。轴锥度影响了 DM 模具的配合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Model Resin and Shaft Taper on the Trueness and Fit of Additively Manufactured Removable Dies in Narrow Ridge Casts.

Purpose: To evaluate how model resin and shaft taper affect the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies in narrow ridge casts.

Materials and methods: A typodont model with a prepared mandibular molar was scanned to design virtual dies with different shaft tapers (0-degree [straight], 5-degree tapered, and 10-degree tapered). In total, 15 dies and one hollowed cast per taper were additively manufactured from two resins (G PRINT 3D Model [GP] and DentaMODEL [DM]). Dies and casts were digitized to evaluate their trueness (root mean square [RMS]). The fit of the dies was evaluated with crown portion's RMS when seated in the cast and with distance deviations. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze data (α =.05).

Results: GP dies had lower overall, root, and base RMS, while DM dies had lower crown RMS (P ≤ .016). Straight dies had the highest overall, root, and base RMS within GP (P ≤ .030). The 10-degree dies had the lowest overall and base RMS, lower crown RMS than straight dies, and lower root RMS than 5-degree dies within DM (P ≤ .047). When the dies were seated, GP had lower crown portion RMS within 5- and 10 degree dies, and 5-degree dies had the highest RMS within DM (P ≤ .003). GP had smaller distance deviations within 5- and 10-degree dies. The 5-degree dies had the largest deviations within DM (P ≤ .049).

Conclusions: GP dies mostly had higher trueness and better fit. Straight dies mostly had lower trueness within GP, and 10-degree taper mostly led to higher trueness within DM. The shaft taper affected the fit of DM dies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信