执行功能简短评估工具在药物使用障碍门诊环境中的有效性。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
C Brooks, J Berry, E A Shores, J Lunn, J Batchelor
{"title":"执行功能简短评估工具在药物使用障碍门诊环境中的有效性。","authors":"C Brooks, J Berry, E A Shores, J Lunn, J Batchelor","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2349682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Brief Executive-function Assessment Tool (BEAT) was developed and validated for use in residential substance use disorder treatment settings, where participants are mostly abstinent. It is therefore unclear whether the BEAT is valid for use in outpatient settings, where participants may be actively using substances. The effects of acute intoxication and withdrawal have the potential to alter the results of the BEAT. The current study sought to establish construct and criterion validity of the BEAT in an outpatient substance use disorder sample and to detect its sensitivity to substance use over the previous 24 hours and also over the past month. A total of 74 clients of a New South Wales-based outpatient substance use disorder service participated in the current study. Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between the BEAT and three performance-based tests of executive functioning. Criterion validity was established in that the BEAT discriminated between those deemed impaired or not on a criterion composite measure of executive functioning. Test operating characteristics (88% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 44% <i>PPV</i>, and 95% <i>NPV</i>) were also established relative to this composite measure as a reference standard. The BEAT was insensitive to use/abstinence over the previous 24 hours and the past month.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of the brief executive-function assessment tool in an outpatient substance use disorder setting.\",\"authors\":\"C Brooks, J Berry, E A Shores, J Lunn, J Batchelor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2024.2349682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Brief Executive-function Assessment Tool (BEAT) was developed and validated for use in residential substance use disorder treatment settings, where participants are mostly abstinent. It is therefore unclear whether the BEAT is valid for use in outpatient settings, where participants may be actively using substances. The effects of acute intoxication and withdrawal have the potential to alter the results of the BEAT. The current study sought to establish construct and criterion validity of the BEAT in an outpatient substance use disorder sample and to detect its sensitivity to substance use over the previous 24 hours and also over the past month. A total of 74 clients of a New South Wales-based outpatient substance use disorder service participated in the current study. Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between the BEAT and three performance-based tests of executive functioning. Criterion validity was established in that the BEAT discriminated between those deemed impaired or not on a criterion composite measure of executive functioning. Test operating characteristics (88% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 44% <i>PPV</i>, and 95% <i>NPV</i>) were also established relative to this composite measure as a reference standard. The BEAT was insensitive to use/abstinence over the previous 24 hours and the past month.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2349682\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2349682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简明执行功能评估工具(BEAT)是针对药物滥用障碍住院治疗环境开发和验证的,在这种环境中,参与者大多是戒断药物滥用的。因此,BEAT 是否适用于门诊环境尚不清楚,因为在门诊环境中,参与者可能会积极使用药物。急性中毒和戒断的影响有可能改变 BEAT 的结果。本研究试图在门诊药物使用障碍样本中建立 BEAT 的结构和标准有效性,并检测其对过去 24 小时和过去一个月药物使用情况的敏感性。共有 74 名来自新南威尔士州药物使用障碍门诊服务机构的患者参与了本次研究。BEAT 与三项基于表现的执行功能测试之间的显著相关性证明了结构效度。标准效度的确立是因为 BEAT 能够区分那些在执行功能标准综合测量中被认为受损或未受损的人。相对于作为参考标准的综合测量,还确定了测试操作特征(88% 灵敏度、69% 特异性、44% PPV 和 95% NPV)。BEAT 对过去 24 小时和过去一个月的使用/戒断不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of the brief executive-function assessment tool in an outpatient substance use disorder setting.

The Brief Executive-function Assessment Tool (BEAT) was developed and validated for use in residential substance use disorder treatment settings, where participants are mostly abstinent. It is therefore unclear whether the BEAT is valid for use in outpatient settings, where participants may be actively using substances. The effects of acute intoxication and withdrawal have the potential to alter the results of the BEAT. The current study sought to establish construct and criterion validity of the BEAT in an outpatient substance use disorder sample and to detect its sensitivity to substance use over the previous 24 hours and also over the past month. A total of 74 clients of a New South Wales-based outpatient substance use disorder service participated in the current study. Construct validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between the BEAT and three performance-based tests of executive functioning. Criterion validity was established in that the BEAT discriminated between those deemed impaired or not on a criterion composite measure of executive functioning. Test operating characteristics (88% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 44% PPV, and 95% NPV) were also established relative to this composite measure as a reference standard. The BEAT was insensitive to use/abstinence over the previous 24 hours and the past month.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信